Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

how much money would it cost to find a cure for cancer and aids?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:50 AM
Original message
how much money would it cost to find a cure for cancer and aids?
would the three trillion dollars that the iraq war will cost us have been enough to cure cancer, aids, diabetes, or any other deadly diseases?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Probably that and feed all of the hungry children of the world as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Three trillion dollars would have gone a long way toward making life
better for every American, regardless of who they are.

It's absolutely criminal that so much money has been wasted on a war based on lies and greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fight4my3sons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. .
that question remided me of The three trillion dollar shopping spree site:

http://3trillion.org/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. The money it would cost to cure cancer and AIDS is no where near
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 12:00 PM by Gman
the amount of money it would cost the pharmaceuticals and shareholders of health care companies in lost business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why in the world would they want to cure themselves out of a multi-billion dollar industry?
There's never any money in a cure--for any of our problems. With the disaster capitalists in charge, there aren't going to be any cures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Even if you want to attribute the worst possible motives...
possibly because if people are cured of these diseases they'll live longer, and the longer they live, the more they'll consume treatments for the common chronic diseases of old age?

This idea of 'never any money is a cure' is exceedingly simplistic - and in that case, why are many cancers (e.g. many forms of childhood leukemia) often cured nowadays, when they would have been incurable 40 years ago? Why is life expectancy steadily rising in wealthier areas - the ones where drugs and doctors are most available - while remaining low or even going down in poor areas? The trouble with 'Big Pharma' is that it doesn't do enough for poorer people and their common diseases (such as malaria and TB; not to mention access to existing anti-HIV drugs); not that it is concealing cures from the better-off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are plenty of people out there who say it can be done holistically/nutritionally.
I personally believe many of them know exactly what they're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Cancer cannot be cured holistically/nutritionally...
though healthy diet and lifestyle may reduce the risk of some forms of cancer developing in the first place.

Some people are able to control type 2 diabetes through diet alone - but not everyone, and it's not a cure. AIDS/HIV cannot even be controlled through diet.

Healthy lifestyle is important, but not a cure-all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. The cost of the Bush administration
will probably settle out around 10 trillion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. three trillion plus would go far to dealing with many societal ills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you're looking for a cure.
Why create a cure when the treatment is so much more profitable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. There is not likely to be a single cure for cancer, because it's really many diseases
Some forms are already curable and often cured; though the cure itself is often painful. Others are very hard to cure.

AIDS and diabetes are more likely to have single cures.

And yes, I think there'd be more chance of cures for serious diseases if so much wasn't going on wars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. It's Redirecting The Research Money
There are a lot of great projects underway in the area of bio-genetic research that holds tremendous promise and has been the result of billions already spent. The problem is that the money doesn't go directly from the government to research, but now a lot comes through pharacutical and other outside companies who stand to benefit from any patents or other profit making opportunities that come out of this reasearch. A lot of government money now goes to the corporates and then into the research...and then once the patents are granted, the public has to wait 14-28 years for patents to expire for the prices on the drugs and procedures of this research to be affordable.

I'd rather reframe your question about directing the money to education. Imagine how many tuitions 3 trillion would pay for...how many new doctors, reasearchers and other advancements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC