Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Scalia On Bush v. Gore: Get Over It!" subtitle-Its all Gore's fault....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:36 AM
Original message
"Scalia On Bush v. Gore: Get Over It!" subtitle-Its all Gore's fault....
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 06:37 AM by cornermouse
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/24/60minutes/main4040290.shtml

"People who believe the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision giving the 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush was politically motivated should just get over it, says Justice Antonin Scalia.

Scalia denies that the controversial decision was political and discusses other aspects of his public and private life in a remarkably candid interview with 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl, this Sunday, April 27, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

"I say nonsense," Scalia responds to Stahl’s observation that people say the Supreme Court’s decision in Gore v. Bush was based on politics and not justice. "Get over it. It’s so old by now. The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn’t even close. The vote was seven to two," he says, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision that the Supreme Court of Florida’s method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional.

Furthermore, says the outspoken conservative justice, it was Al Gore who ultimately put the issue into the courts. "It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question…. We didn’t go looking for trouble. It was he who said, 'I want this to be decided by the courts,'" says Scalia. "What are we supposed to say -- 'Not important enough?'" he jokes."


Proposal: The next Democratic President and Congress should consider finding a way to impeach sitting Supreme Court Justices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Scalia's contempt for that quaint idea of counting the vote.
"The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme
Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn’t even close."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. FASCIST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is the idiot rewriting history?
The real case was called Bush v Gore, not Gore v Bush. That is because the person complaining or asking for judicial intervention is listed first. Copied right off the petition: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES/GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., PETITIONERS v. ALBERT GORE, Jr., et al./ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Bush was the first to file a complaint with the courts and bush was the first to take it to the Supremes, NOT Gore. Gore challenged the results when Katherine Harris decided to declare the bush our president but that was after the bush had already filed with the courts.

Is he attempting to rewrite history or is he covering his tracks?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Kudos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's up to Congress. There's not much chance Nancy Off-the-table Pelosi will find
time in her busy schedule for such unimportant matters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yet she can do commercials with the right wing asshole Newt
That commercial she does pisses me off. She is telling us we need to contact our leaders, WTF is she? Oh never mind, she isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. get over it!!!!
the arrogance of these thugs is stunning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markbark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Point of Order...
Proposal: The next Democratic President and Congress should consider finding a way to impeach sitting Supreme Court Justices.

I know it's "just a goddamn piece of paper" but I think the relevant clause can be found in Article 2, Section 4 of the US Constitution.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High crimes and misdemeanors.

Apparently all it takes is a member of Congress with a little bit of backbone; a rare beast indeed.

--MAB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Supposed lack of backbone = All by design
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. The President would have little to do with impeachment


Proposal: The next Democratic President and Congress should consider finding a way to impeach sitting Supreme Court Justices.


Impeachment is an issue for Congress; However, taking bribes while a sitting judge (hunting trips paid for by litigants, etc.) would come under the purview of Justice Dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. Dec. 12, 2000 is Junta Day and always will be. The People will never forget the theft of Democracy
You do not get over the end of democracy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC