Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Would Ban Adult Mags From Bases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Wabbajack_ Donating Member (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:57 AM
Original message
Bill Would Ban Adult Mags From Bases
Washington - Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga., has introduced a bill to prohibit the sale of "sexually explicit" material at military installations.

"Our troops should not see their honor sullied so that the moguls behind magazines like Playboy and Penthouse can profit," Broun said in a statement.

Broun said his bill, titled "The Military Honor and Decency Act," is needed to close a loophole in current law that allows the sale and rental of sexually explicit material on military bases both in the United States and abroad.

"Allowing the sale of pornography on military bases has harmed military men and women by escalating the number of violent, sexual crimes; feeding a base addiction; eroding the family as the primary building block of society; and denigrating the moral standing of our troops both here and abroad," said Broun, a physician and former Marine reservist.

His bill would require the Department of Defense to review material not now deemed sexually explicit under the "National Defense Authorization Act of 1997" to see if it should be banned from sale on military installations.

http://www.military.com/news/article/bill-would-ban-adult-mags-from-bases.html?col=1186032310810
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh sure, you don't give our troops good care,
you don't provide them with good equipment, and you take away the GI Bill. Now you want to take away a little nuddie too? Leave the soldiers alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's a darned good thing this politician has nothing more pressing
to worry about. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah, like adequate body armor, or comrade rape, or anything like that.
its ok if our good soldiers are killed for a lie, but darn if they can look at cleavage on their time off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good law, poor justification.
Not using the military to distribute material that degrades women and eroticizes violence against them is necessary, given the problems in the military.

Tying it in with "honor" and "moral standing" confuses religion and the "sex-is-bad" folks with those who don't think government property should be used to fuel exploitation of women and violence against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Asserting that all porn eroticizes violence or degrades women is equally unjustified
But then I am (as Molly Ivins) a 1st Amendment feminist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Ah well, then.
Clearly you are far superior to me. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. You're not a 1st Amendment feminist?
And nice try using my standard argument against me, but it doesn't work at all in this case. See, you
have to use the comment when it makes sense. ;)

You believe in oppressing the free speech of all people to serve the interests of one group?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. That's the only kind.
If you don't support the rights of free speech, you don't support the rights of women or anybody else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Which was my point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Do you think military bases should sell
KKK newsletters and Nazi paraphernalia?

Or would you consider it a violation of the 1st amendment to prevent it from being sold on government installations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Oh, please! KKK newsletters and Nazi paraphernalia are an entirely different matter
Their hatred of specific groups is well-defined. You're assuming all porn is antagonistic toward women. It's not.
Sexuality itself requires some objectifying of the subject -- it happens in women's porn, too. Also, a lot of women
participate in powerplay in sexuality -- is a dominatrix anti-male? These are complex issues that require careful,
rational assessment not polemic based on emotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. Do I think they should be outlawed by the government? No.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
30. How about gay mags?
Do they degrade men and eroticize violence against them? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. I've asked before. All I get are crickets.
hmmm... just like now!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. how on earth does Playboy "eroticizes violence"???
Is female nudity violence??? Is sex between adults violence now???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Should they sell magazines with articles like
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 05:00 PM by lwfern
"how to beat your wife without leaving any marks" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Isn't that the slippery slope argument?
"If we let gays marry each other, we'll have to let kindergartners marry rhinocerouses."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. How is that a slippery slope argument?
It's a title of a playboy magazine article. My question was should we allow that to be sold at US government facilities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Should Johnathon Swift be sold at Army bases?
I, for one, don't want my tax dollars supporting cannabilism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. strawman much???
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 05:17 PM by LSK
Which issue was that article in Playboy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. No, they shouldn't. How does Playboy eroticize violence? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. rape fantasy crap, for starters.
From playboy: "In "Shrink Rap", a repressed housewife tells her pyschiatrist about her recurring rape fantasy, in which dreams that she dresses up sexy, goes to a rough bar, and deliberately teases a man there into stalking her home and breaking down her door."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Mmmmmm.
Go on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. This guy must have more porn on his home PC than Larry Flynt n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I'll bet Flynt's at the stage in his life where he doesn't bring work home with him anymore!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. I would send Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga. to Fort Bragg
so he can focus on genuine nastiness :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's de ja vu. This gets tried every few years...
That's a lot easier than admitting that recruiting criminals has something to do with the increase of crimes within the military.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. ..or admiting that multiple extended tours might affect their psyche and their behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. They hate us for our freedoms. And they hate the troops. Chickenhawk bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
57. Broun isn't a chickenhawk, but he is an idiot
Of that there can be no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. They've tried doing this before, at least twice that I remember.
They did get rid of some of the cheesier magazines, but the two mentioned above got "excused."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Playboy has never been "sexually explicit"
What a dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. He's awfully concerned about "moguls profiting" isn't he?
Obviously, Penthouse and Playboy don't have their headquarters in HIS district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Better to kick Rush off of Armed Forces radio. That's real porn....
........rots the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDogDistrict44 Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. Now you will have a revolt on your hands Mr. Bush! Takith no booby away I say
The nerve.

www.unleashthedog.us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, let's protect our troops from themselves.......
.....while sending them off to get shot for an unjust reason. What an asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. So, is Congress also going to ban
the sale of fake bulls' testicles as car decorations so that our good and pure women and children aren't offended? Surely that must rank right up there with keeping Penthouse and Playboy off military bases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I think Fl. is doing just that,
I saw a news story that some state senator had introduced a bill to ban the dangling balls...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Yeah,
that's where I got the idea of asking if Congress was going to take up that vital issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
59. that ban on fake bull testicles on vehicles in florida will never pass.
well...it IS florida, so it just might pass- but even if it did, ultimately it would rightly be found to be unconstitutional and struck down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. We need a "Right to Wank" case to go to the Supreme court if this passes
Seems like it might fall under pursuit of happiness...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. We've got to preserve our precious bodily fluids!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. That's one way to diminish the ranks of our volunteer army real fast.
Who is coaching these Republicans anyway, Al Qaeda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
24. another tight ass Republican trying to exorcise his own demons
Good luck with taking Playboy out of military bases! That'll never happen.

Even without the first amendment issue, which is both relevant and controlling.

As for the agents of censorship - fascists are just as bad on the left as on the right. They're pretty much indistinguishable when they get on their high horse and try to arrange the morals of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
25. This bill smells to high heaven of wingnut religious Right bullshit
. . .and people should treat this congressman as the religious panderer he is . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. Our troops are adult enough to defend our liberty with their lives,
But does that mean they're adult enough to cope with the First Amendment?

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. Holy crap, porn is the only thing that got me through a couple of
remote deployments.

I wish I was kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
29. Once again...
Violence is good. Sex is bad.

It's the titties, stupid!

America, huh? What a country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
31. There is no limit to how ridiculous politicians can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. Announcing Operation Endless Cheesecake!
Let's all show how much we support our troops — by buying boxes and boxes full of good, old-fashioned, wholesome pr0n and shipping them off as CARE packages to our boys and girls on the front lines!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
35. "Our troops should not see their honor sullied (so that Shell and BP can AGAIN post record profits."
Careful, Rep. Broun, on how you use a really bad analogy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
37. Onward Puritanical Christian Soldiers
Our pure Christian soldiers wouldn't naturally think about sex unless evil magazines lure them into the clutches of Satan, right? Tu Do Street in Saigon was lined with evil Satanic Vietnamese girls who physically forced our noble GIs to go there to degrade themselves with sexual activity during the Vietnam war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. So they cannot see nekkid women
but they can engage in that other whoring act called WAR.

There are days...

Been done in the past as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. 1955 just called and they want their Rep back
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
43. god's little army.....'their honor sullied'? who the fuck is this guy?
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 04:37 PM by spanone
how do clowns like this get elected to public office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
46. lololololol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
49. They need to ban Rush also
cause he is offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
56. Forget getting decent medical care and clean barracks, this is way more important
:eyes: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
58. Banning adult magazines on bases has nothing to do with Porn.
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 07:45 AM by formercia
It's because magazines like HUSLTER publish articles that counter the Administrations' 'War on Terror', the illegal War of Aggression in Iraq, and other anti-democratic policies.

They want to 'protect' the troops from exposure to this potentially divisive literature.

If they were to ban specific magazines, that would immediately raise a cry of censorship, This way, they can use the cover of banning pornography to affect their intended goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
60. Not bad enough for the troops already.
After all the wars, the "Bring'em on" and the stop losses, the lack of health care and a wrecked economy when they return to society, it's still isn't bad enough for the troops as far as the GOP is concerned. Now they have to pander to their fundie constituents with this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC