Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kick if you want to kick' em: M$ (Internet Explorer) behavior

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:33 PM
Original message
Kick if you want to kick' em: M$ (Internet Explorer) behavior
Edited on Mon May-05-08 12:02 AM by BelgianMadCow
Internet Explorer:
a) logs files you accessed on "My Computer" - just check the history
b) it does so even if it is not your default browser!
c) it does so even when you don't use it at all to surf or view files

Bugs ya? Tough luck, Internet Explorer is an "integral part" :puke: of Windows since XP - uninstalling it is:
a) nearly impossible to do (I un-ticked it during XP installation, but hey hey it's there nonetheless :mad:)
b) dangerous: M$ makes IE the only browser allowed to download critical updates - if you use another, you have to wade through the pardon my French shit to choose your updates...they should be sued to kingdom come for this alone.
:banghead:

Soooo a program that I can't choose to have or not (see also http://forums.cnet.com/5208-6142_102-0.html?forumID=5&threadID=31055&messageID=353751 ) logs me? :wtf: Helloooo privacy? Okay I know privacy is an illusion anyway but this is so blatant...

This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine, I just wanted to vent and warn other users (which is also why I posted in my fav GD, not a topic forum).

Revenge!
I have Firefox from www.mozilla.org as default browser (and thunderbird as mail client).
I will disable internet connection of IE through my firewall and open it up only for critical updates.
I started using OpenOffice from www.openoffice.org (free), M$ can suck it with their idiotic Office 2007 update.
I have a dual boot with Linux and will be using that for more and more tasks.
DON'T go Vista! My wife has it on her laptop - gonna throw Vista off and use XP instead!! You can ask for XP upon delivery of a new PC as well.
I'm a gamer, so for the time being I'm stuck with M$ for that alone...note also the COUP they tried to pull with DirectX 10-only games and Vista :mad:

Can you tell I'm pissed? :rant:

Kick if you wanna kick'em pls


regards
bmc

PS: no offense to people working for M$ - they do own 90+ % of the home PC OS market...:nuke: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. XP service pack 2 is faster than Vista anyway. I'm still using Win2k SP4 on this laptop. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. We are sold new "needs" but 0.X % needs them...ah, and on Vista man oh man...
I read a whole PC mag dedicated to speeding up your PC - guess what, one of the first things to disable was "indexing services". Well color me not surprised: Vista will have operational issues if you do so, unlike XP...:mad:

They "simplify" things but you have no idea anymore of what happens on your PC.

Thanks for the rec!
:hi:
bmc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. IE? Vista? That's just crazytalk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Succinct :-)
:crazy: I got sucked in I guess ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Don't get me wrong - I don't buy into that Mac stuff - that's for babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. It is? Hmmm
you know these days running the vista machine is far more painful than Linux... and lord knows linux can be a pain at times

By the way, you DO KNOW that the MAC OS is based on a pretty mature UNIX kernel, don't you? Not quite baby stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. :sarcasm: methinks ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Not really, some folks are pretty hard core
about their allegiance to an OS.. regardless of which one

You find that with Maccies (lord do you ever), Linux fans (I think Debian in particular but any distro will have them), and also Windows... and ever since Vista came out (with all its problems) it has become quite obvious... hell I once came across a user of an early Amiga... and would have nothing else, period (Oh and for the kiddies if memory serves a really early version of unix)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Oh my Amiga the memories...
been hooked since the Commodore C64...now see what FUN gaming that brought you for relative peanuts and with 64 Kb RAM!!!!!
Boggles the mind.
hate to have sold it :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. My first computer ran DOS, and had 512K RAM and no internal drive
It ran all from disk... hell, it had a 3.5 floppy

OOOHHH

My sis... just donated the thing... ran on a new fangled 5.25 floppy

My lord I was so afraid of that thing... then I started playing with number of pages to open....

The memories... but it wasn't even good for a server.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Nah. His fact (1) wasn't under dispute, and his fact (2) is too recent to be relevant....
... In any case, if you want *nix, there are far better ways to go about obtaining it. If you don't want *nix, then there's no point in pointing it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. I have *nix, but do tell
what better way? Curious here...I admit Ubuntu proved a bit challenging to get up and running.

I think Mac is rather expensive, really...yeah, they are better than M$ - not a high bar though :-/
People being sold the NEED for an IPOD costing 200 Euro when we had walkmans for 25 euro back in the 80's...:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Excuse me for pointing this out
but DOS broke away from UNIX, not mac... decades ago

The Unix system in a mac has far more in common with historic unix than oh Windows Vista has with 98... let alone 3.1 Though vista is a close cousin of NT which makes me wonder how the hell did they manage to mess that one up?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah, plus Al Gore is on their board
go figure...

Me, I'm a bit masochistic too. The true nerd likes a bit of a challenge. So I HATE to have failed w/rgds to IE...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. I'll try to remember that as I stare mesmerized by the 30" screen on my Mac-for-babies. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. And I run Winxp Pro 64 and Fedora Core 8 on a 50" 1080p DLP screen.
You... can connect your Mac to a non-Apple display device, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. I have a few more ixels on my screen than you have on yours. ;-)
2560-by-1600 pixel resolution.

http://www.apple.com/displays/



And *OF COURSE* you can connect an Apple to anything
that supports DVI, VGA, or HDMI.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. You calling me a baby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do you think I am typing from my Macbook
Yep, VISTA

By the way will be buying a copy of XP for the gaming machine, so we can run some programs that WILL NOT run on Vista

Hell, tempted to get home edidtion for the laptop for... you guessed it, those two programs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah I may go that route too...
But will someone, pretty please, develop gaming on something else than windows?? And I don't mean console, that's not all I want (plus, they sooo rip you - 70 euro for a new release? Everybody happy??)

Now you have to tell me what those two programs are :P

I'm a WoW-er, online shooter (Q3, BF2, the free (!) www.warsow.net), simmer...oh well, I have too many games and too little time...

:hi:
bmc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. War of warcraft WILL run on Macs
http://www.apple.com/games/articles/2004/11/worldofwarcraft/

You can also run BF 2 on a MAC

http://www.extremesims.com/index.php?topic=1207.msg10136

And with an INTEL machine, if you absolutely need to run a program that runs only on WINDOWS. you can install windows on a partition of your MAC Intel machine and guess what? RUN windows. You can use bootcamp and will have to boot up every time you change OS, you can try virtualization software (such as VM Ware) and run both OSs side by side

By the way, since you are a gamer I'd look into a "better" machine than my macbook

The MBP has an NVIDIA 8800 on board, for example.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. Which is better Parallels or VM Ware?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Haven't used either
from the reviews I think parallels is faster, but UNTIL I install a second OS on this machine (Home, trust me I need it sadly)

I will not futz... and at that moment I will have to get a virus checker and all that jazz


UGGH...

Why I think I'll just stick to a pure mac for my machine and use the other one, after I split drive and install XP

I expect corep painter to finally behave... and that one has a larger screen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. Thanks. It will be a while before I decide on where I want to go from
here. I want to run Linux again, but not sure if I want to dual boot or get a Linux laptop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. .
Edited on Sun May-04-08 11:56 PM by wtmusic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. :-)
need better excuse first ;-)
and $$ come to speak of it

but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. Am I the only one here who still uses Win2k??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well I guess you are
if it makes you feel good... my brother would still use 98 if he could find a copy somewhere

:-)

And he has a point when it comes to stabilty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
31. Win98 was stable for him? I remember BSoDs when I ran 98. It's why I went Win2k.
WinME was a joke, so let's not talk about that era of experimentation. The only upshot was that I used a burned copy, so I didn't actually lose money on it. :)

I fucking hate the new docx format. Totally unnecessary. If I'm working with the new version of Office, I always save to the earlier format for backward compatibility with my older version of Office (2002).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Nah - I have an old el cheapo PC destined for my 5 year old - Win 95
and it's gonna keep runnin' 95 - couldn't destabilise it even if I tried (and I can mess up PCs pretty well).

I would really recommend people to get a PC FOR THEIR NEEDS and no more (meaning, they sell you overspecced systems all the time...)
getting it up to speed with the proper software and accessories and then...tzadzaam....stick with it!

Then they try and get to you via compatibility issues such as the new "docx" bleh...but openoffice can import/export M$ so in this opensourced world (still...) they will not beat us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Sure they are trying
open office was the world format, until MS pressured to get docx as the standard

I expect the next version of OO to be compliant with... you guessed it, word

And yes, I am running a maccie version on the Macbook (neo office no X-10 thankee)

As to buying what you need... agreed... some of just need very high end graphics for some uses (what the win machine was supposed to do)

;-(

At least it works for my husband's gaming... but until we get an XP partition on that sucker I ain't working on it

Corel Painter just does not behave well, that said it does on the macbook


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. yeah I hate needing high end graphics too
Edited on Mon May-05-08 12:26 AM by BelgianMadCow
;-( hihi

My GeForce 6600 GT 128 Mb is rather "old" - but they charge you half a PCs price for good graphics cards nowadays...that ain't normal either...
And yeah I'd love a gaming notebook, but they're hard to come by and expensive when you do...

I'm pretty sure, the whole streaming/digital (HD)TV - HDMI (which is a Digital Rights management system FIRST) is so gonna screw us - pricewise. Here, they threw NGC and BBC and Eurosport off the regular cable, now you can get it as a pack...:banghead:...
Surprise surprise that happened since the cable network was privatised...(pinko commie alert).

edit PS: my wife games along - we fought over the Sims back in the day and now we WoW...in the wintertime lol. Ankhira and Ankhero :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Not surprised and the Geo force 8800 WAS a large component
of the Win machine... so I understand (though we buy machines that will serve us for seven to eight years. We finally replaced the XP machine when it finally stopped doing what the gamer in the house needed. I just happen to get a side benefit for it)

As to high def... I am extremely suspicious of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. If a game needs the ultra high def to be worthwile - oh and on HDTV:!!
Edited on Mon May-05-08 12:40 AM by BelgianMadCow
the gameplay must suck - WoW runs pretty OK on my wife's basic laptop...not to say high def can't be awesome, but me too I play till I have a framerate of 10 using the lowest settings - for the latest generation... and then I will reconsider...

Should you be able to keep this thread up a bit...I have a habit of posting in the wee hours (as do you I noticed before) and gonna feed a newborn and get the oldest to school :D

:hi:
bmc

PS: oh sorry if you were talking HDTV:

People you CANNOT see the difference (okay, on the price tag you can) between HD and HD ready at a distance of 3.5 meters or higher!! (for a typical 42 inch setup, changes a bit)
People here ALL need their big LCD, the things I hear 'em being told in electro stores... :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Have fun, and I am considering hitting the rack... need to be up early
tomorrow morning to go get groceries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Night!
be seeing you around :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. That you will
As soon as throwdown is over... I am gone to bed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. Nope; Win2K still runs on two of our test systems.
Edited on Mon May-05-08 07:26 AM by Tesha
We have given up on testing on Win98, though, although we've
been considering rolling one of the Win2K machines back to
that older software.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
42. My husband's machine is still running 98SE
He hates change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
35. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
38. Mine doesn't
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. what exactly? log files in the history?
what OS and IE version do you have if I may ask? Curious now (no, make that always ;-))..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. IE8 beta on Vista Ulitimate
I looked through, and there's only entries from when I used it. It didn't log any firefox activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
39. Win2KPro on this box. Dual-boot XP on the Ms. notebook, and LINUX
every where else. I play games and she uses Quickbooks Pro, otherwise we would be entirely M$ free.
:kick:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
43. ahh silly pc...
get a mac. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
45. There are two programs to help tame Windows XP
SafeXP and xp-AntiSpy both make it easy to clean up the biggest security problems with Windows XP. I generally use them both after any re-installation, since they have somewhat different lists.

I don't know if they deal with the problem you cite of IE logging files -- though you can set the IE cache to be cleared automatically on shutdown, and perhaps that will do it. But I still recommend them strongly.

(You have to be careful, though. I turned off, I think it was, Task Scheduler, and didn't realize I wasn't getting Restore points created automatically at each reboot until I ran into problems and had to go back two weeks and lost some changes.)

http://www.theorica.net/safexp.htm

http://xp-antispy.org/index.php?lang=en

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC