Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are deficits "taxation without representation?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:29 AM
Original message
Are deficits "taxation without representation?"
My kids can't vote, but they have to pay taxes in the future to pay for the huge Bush/Republican deficit fiasco. To me that seems like taxation without representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think you are headed in the right direction
but there is a little more to it than just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. "there is a little more to it than just that."
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 10:59 AM by gulliver
Agreed. I just hate deficit spending being the loosy-goosy, backdoor taxation method it really is. Putting something on the "credit card" needs to be as hard (or harder) than paying with "checking" when it comes to spending the people's money. Otherwise, you get a wild-eyed, big spending numbskull like Bush in office, and he has effectively unlimited spending power. Deficit spending as a hidden, evil practice favors the corrupt such as the Reagan and Bush administrations.

Cheney said that "deficits don't matter." That's a heck of an insight. We need to make deficits matter. One way of doing that is possibly to tie the practice to "taxation without representation." More to it, though...I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. That is definitely a fair argument.
Taxing the unborn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Pay it forward!
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 10:49 AM by AP
Deficit spending can be a good thing (when you're making an investment in the future -- i.e., the New Deal). However, people today should care a little more about the world they're leaving for their children's children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. "making an investment"
Edited on Sun Jun-01-08 11:07 AM by gulliver
I agree. Deficits can be good. If making an investment, though, it should be clear exactly what the prospectus is. Bush's deficits got us nothing...got us less than nothing. Deficits that are used to fund New Deal type stuff get us highway systems and public works. Deficit spending invested in education gets us brain power in an increasingly brain power oriented world. Deficits incurred for tax cuts to the wealthy and wars get the people zero. In the case of the war, far less than zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think you are correct.
I had never heard it defined in such a way but I think it is right on mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-01-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. They sure as hell are. I don't even HAVE grandkids yet, but I
know they'll still be paying buckets of interest on these massive loans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC