|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:37 PM Original message |
Girl in polygamy case is disputing another female's claim to her baby. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. k&r Is this W. Jeff's kid? I can't tell if this is about 2 different kids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I can't tell either. I thought the article about Jeff's daughter said that she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Thanks, looking again. Interesting bit on changing church policy re underage marriages... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, if the FLDS are serious about stopping underage marriages, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Fundamentalism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. the children are taken away at birth, many do not know who is mother is or child is.. this simplifys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Has anyone figured out just how many kids Jeff's has? It's disgusting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Android3.14 (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. I hope it works out for that young alleged mother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. How could they have done a "proper investigation" that would have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. those 12 year olds will say anything .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think maybe we now know why . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. this isn't polygamy.. this is a Pedophile breeding farm to produce children to be raped |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Many of us have no problem with adult polygamy, but statutory rape is different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. So is the DNA testing going forward or not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yes. DNA testing of children and adult females is going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. hell yes the men should be tested! I guess I assumed they were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-02-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Last I heard, many men weren't complying. I don't know why the judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC