Debbie Wasserman Shultz says Congress is going to

[malaise]

turn up the heat as hot as it needs to get Rove to come and answer those questions

On Abrams now.

[OffWithTheirHeads]

1. I'll believe it when I see it

nt.

[rusty quoin]

2. Me too. I have been waiting for results for too long. n/t

[lonestarnot]

6. Me three!

[Orrex]

3. I'm sure that the Impeachment drive will really get under way by mid to late November

And then he'd better watch out!

[Ichingcarpenter]

4. Why doesn't she submit a bill or vote on inherent contempt?

If she spent more time doing her job than running Hillary's Florida assault
then maybe I would believe her.

[malaise]

5. I think that's coming

I'm hoping

[ColbertWatcher]

9. Because-unlike the way the GOP does things-...

...real justice takes some time.

While the GOP pushes an agenda, judges (the very sasme ones they call "activist") consider the law and the constitution.

[JDPriestly]

7. They should just go for it. They don't have to get Senate approval.

And now that McClellan has raised his questions about Rove's role in the Plame affair, they really need to get Rove up there and ask him the questions. Of course, he can invoke executive privilege to get out of answering specific questions, but It is very possible that, in order to invoke that privilege, he will have to admit or suggest that Bush was involved in some pretty unsavory stuff.

[midnight]

8. I noticed it was bit hot here today in Wisconsin.

[aint_no_life_nowhere]

10. At least make an honest effort - whether it's successful or not

I imagine the Bush Administration will go to code blue and bring on an army of attorneys to drag it out. All I ask is for them to try instead of sitting on their hands.

[proud2BlibKansan]

11. Do you trust her?

I am not sure I do.

[tsuki]

12. No. nt