Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

America's house prices are falling even faster than during the Great Depression

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 09:35 PM
Original message
America's house prices are falling even faster than during the Great Depression
Through the floor
May 29th 2008
From Economist.com

America's house prices are falling even faster than during the Great Depression


AS HOUSE prices in America continue their rapid descent, market-watchers are having to cast back ever further for gloomy comparisons. The latest S&P/Case-Shiller national house-price index, published this week, showed a slump of 14.1% in the year to the first quarter, the worst since the index began 20 years ago. Now Robert Shiller, an economist at Yale University and co-inventor of the index, has compiled a version that stretches back over a century. This shows that the latest fall in nominal prices is already much bigger than the 10.5% drop in 1932, the worst point of the Depression. And things are even worse than they look. In the deflationary 1930s house prices declined less in real terms. Today inflation is running at a brisk pace, so property prices have fallen by a staggering 18% in real terms over the past year.




http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11465476

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. we just got offered 100K to by a loft
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 09:38 PM by mitchtv
in Downtown LA ( they were desperately overpriced to begin with). i'd have to sell my home first good luck with that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 100k in LA?
Isn't that a really good price? Hasn't LA always been insanely overpriced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. !00K to buy a loft
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 02:10 PM by mitchtv
which starts at mid 400s to 700 , still not worth it. It is a rather deep discount, but still more than we want to spend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. House prices fell all through the 1920s
along with land prices. It was part and parcel of a protracted real estate crunch that left homeowners with little net worth and farmers not enough to borrow against to plant their crops.

Add to that the fact that most mortgages in the 20s were balloon mortgages that people had to refinance every few years or lose the house, and you have a recipe for disaster that we seem to have repeated with creative financing fueling our own housing bubble. Once refinancing is no longer possible, the bubble busts.

Just realize it took housing about 15 years to deflate completely, and only the advent of WWII jobs combined with the newfangled 30 year fixed mortgage allowed the market to recover.

Farmers fared worse, many losing their farms to what would later become Agribusiness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well there you go stating Historical facts......
It is amazing to me that this administration and previous administrations (including Dems) could not look at the Historical facts and see that we were headed in the same direction.

This administration and the Republican Congress over over the last 20 years through their sheer stubborness has set this country back 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. There's always a sense that
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 10:23 PM by Gman
if they do the same thing but do it different or somehow better, the bad things won't happen again. But they're still doing the same thing so the end result is also the same. There's always a sense of "that was then, this is now".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. they knew EXACTLY what was happening. they didn't CARE.
they are OWNED by those who legally bribe them

did you see the thread about Schumer/Reid and the hedge fund managers, who now pay 15% taxes....DU link somewhere

both parties are high priced (in joe schmuck terms) hookers, mere cheap hoors to the oil companies, banks, insurance companies, etc., who buy them at DIRT cheap prices, in comparison to the largesse they lavish on them via the 'legislative' process

they ONLY represent them that pays their freight, read campaign contributions, and it's only getting worse, and will NEVER change, because they're the ones who pass the laws that keep things the way they are.

will it change...yeah....for the worse

AmerCon : Corporate FascismCorporatism, or corporate fascism, is the American form of this disease. ... the majority can come in many forms, and one of them is corporate fascism. ...
americanconscience.org/poly_5_corporate_fascism.html - 16k - Cached - Similar pages

Corporate fascism - Hutchinson encyclopedia article about ...Hutchinson encyclopedia article about Corporate fascism. Corporate fascism. Information about Corporate fascism in the Hutchinson encyclopedia.
encyclopedia.farlex.com/Corporate+fascism - 28k - Cached - Similar pages

Fascism watchFascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate power." Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), Fascist ...
www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Fascism.html - 27k - Cached - Similar pages

It's the Corporate State, StupidNov 10, 2004 ... "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini. ...
www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7260.htm - 15k - Cached - Similar pages

Interview: Ralph Nader Says We're Living Under Corporate FascismMar 28, 2008 ... Ralph Nader running for President in sat down with Red Tape Chronicles to talk about the current deplorable state of.
consumerist.com/373394/interview-ralph-nader-says-were-living-under-corporate-fascism - Similar pages

Lynn Stuter -- Corporate FascismCORPORATE FASCISM. By Lynn Stuter. May 2, 2006. NewsWithViews.com. The evening news last night from Spokane in the state of Washington revealed that while ...
www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter89.htm - 26k - Cached - Similar pages

Amazon.com: "The Rise Of Corporate Fascism"A list of products including, Introducing Fascism & Nazism (Introducing (Icon)), ... Corporateering: How Corporate Power Steals Your Personal Freedom.
www.amazon.com/The-Rise-Of-Corporate-Fascism/lm/3O78XTDAB70HK - 120k - Cached - Similar pages

A Kind of Fascism Is Replacing Our DemocracyA Kind of Fascism Is Replacing Our Democracy. by Sheldon S. Wolin ... The system responds primarily to corporate interests; voters become cynical, resigned; ...
www.commondreams.org/views03/0718-07.htm - 17k - Cached - Similar pages

TruthNews.us » Blog Archive » Corporate Fascism’s Greatest AllyThe behavior, and lack of backbone branching from these limbs is allowing the perpetuation and consolidation of the corporate fascist state. ...
www.truthnews.us/?p=2038 - 45k - Cached - Similar pages

» Is the US living under Corporate Fascism? Dvorak Uncensored ...Ralph Nader was recently interviewed by NBC and said that the US is living under “corporate fascism.” The timing is perfect if you consider these two events ...
www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16910 - 136k - Cached - Similar pages


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. This administration had a lot of help
The whole process started with Reagan, was slowed slightly under Poppy, continued apace under Clinton (the biggest Democratic disappointment in my life) and came to fruition with Stupid in office.

We'll be lucky if we're set back only 20 years. It's going to take a lot of will and hard work to set up the conditions for the next wave of industrialization--and the means to keep it here instead of being looted in the name of globalization.

I'm afraid we're in for a lot of years of very rough transition time in multiple systems in this country, housing being only one of them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. 20 years? Try 230 years? Try 800 years, if one counts the end of habeus corpus.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. The graph in the pic is somewhat deceptive.
Since it only shows % change in price year-over-year, it doesn't really give an accurate picture of home prices, especially of how absurdly overinflated they were in the last decade.

This graphic is a bit more useful for understanding how unprecedented the rise in real estate prices was.





And of course, the reason for the rise in prices:







Without rising incomes for all economic quintiles, the soaring prices in homes were only good for people who had homes to sell. Millions of hardworking people who were unwilling to take out a no-interest teaser, liar loan or subprime loan were priced out of buying a home. Good riddance to the housing bubble. The very notion that we as a country hitched our national economic wagon to HOME PRICES instead of actual productive activities that produce WAGES for people is OBSCENE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yikes! Edgier by the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Housing has been absurdly overvalued
for several years. Prices are just getting back down to something resembling reality. Anyone with half a brain could see it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's actually a good time to buy if you can afford to.
My husband has been in a real estate-related business for almost 30 years and we've seen values go up and values come down. Never as bad as this, to be sure, but they will go back up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Who can afford to?
With rising gas and food prices, drops in real wages, and massive personal debt, I don't care how low home prices get. I see a lot of wishful thinking going on, and it frustrates me greatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. People like my brother can.
Making $50,000+ per year, delivering fuel to gas stations. Though he'd refuse to buy a house thats more than $150 grand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, please with this shit. $25,000 off from $650,000 in L.A. isn't a bargain.
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Huh? Not sure what you're referring to with the $25,000.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 08:40 PM by whereismyparty
The graph is showing percentages, not direct dollar value.

25-30% of %650,000 would be a great deal of money. Particularly if you bought high and need to sell now that it is so low. Those people are totally screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. just today I sold my home for 65,000 with a appraisal of 141,000 and a value from the city of 130,00
I only hope those who bought the house get a good return because we were at the end point of a balloon and did not qualify for a loan... I hope the housing market rebounds...we are left with enough cash to purchase a home for cash in another state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC