Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

oil experts: significance of Bakken field

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:20 AM
Original message
oil experts: significance of Bakken field
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24057222/

The U.S. Geological Survey called it the largest continuous oil accumulation it has ever assessed.

The Bakken Formation encompasses some 25,000 square miles in North Dakota, Montana, Saskatchewan and Manitoba. About two-thirds of the acreage is in western North Dakota, where the oil is trapped in a thin layer of dense rock nearly two miles beneath the surface. Companies use pressurized fluid and sand to break pores in the rock and prop them open to recover the oil.

-----------

heard this discussed at a peak oil conference.
experts pooh poohed the significance of this field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. pressurized fluid
aka water. So what happens to the water when it comes out again - massive pollution I'd say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's a little pollution for the sake of a few drops of oil?

It's not their water.


:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This type of pumping is being done in eastern Wyoming
A Canadian company started this several years ago near Newcastle Wyoming. The problem with this is if there is a fracture or crack in the rock then it is possible to contaminate groundwater with oil. Thus neighboring water well could potentially be deemed unusable. It can also work the other way by leaking water into other oil wells not being pumped this way. Not all ground is suitable for this type of drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Unbelievable
And just think, they are probably doing it on federal land using subsidies and getting free water.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't know about all of them
Some of these are spent wells that are on private property. Of course if the land owner doesn't own the mineral rights whoever does (oil company) makes the profit. There was oil left in them but until the price went up it was to expensive to remove using the water method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, about 430 days worth of US oil consumption
4.3 billion barrels is quite small when you consider that the US consumes 10,000,000 barrels every single day.

This is just another attempt to keep the US oil addiction going strong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. don't forget those profits
This administration knows how hard it is for those (hardworking, long suffering) stockholders. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC