Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's with all the political correct polls?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:25 AM
Original message
What's with all the political correct polls?
Do you still think for yourself?

Are your a DU Dittohead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um, is wasting resources the same as "thinking for yourself?"
What the fuck are you even on about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is being politically correct a bad thing?
Usually it is to not offend someone. Do you think that is a worthy goal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. What if I was truely offend by gay rights?
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 11:59 AM by hack89
would you self-censor your speech to accommodate me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, but that is not the question I'm asking.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 12:35 PM by Mountainman
If the group has one good idea that does not mean all it's ideas are good. You may agree with the group on and idea and if it is your own thinking that gets you there good.

It is not a good thing to let other people do your thinking for you.

check this out:

IMMANUEL KANT
An Answer to the Question:
What is Enlightenment? (1784)
Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one's understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! "Have courage to use your own understanding!"--that is the motto of enlightenment.

Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why so great a proportion of men, long after nature has released them from alien guidance (natura-liter maiorennes), nonetheless gladly remain in lifelong immaturity, and why it is so easy for others to establish themselves as their guardians. It is so easy to be immature. If I have a book to serve as my understanding, a pastor to serve as my conscience, a physician to determine my diet for me, and so on, I need not exert myself at all. I need not think, if only I can pay: others will readily undertake the irksome work for me. The guardians who have so benevolently taken over the supervision of men have carefully seen to it that the far greatest part of them (including the entire fair sex) regard taking the step to maturity as very dangerous, not to mention difficult. Having first made their domestic livestock dumb, and having carefully made sure that these docile creatures will not take a single step without the go-cart to which they are harnessed, these guardians then show them the danger that threatens them, should they attempt to walk alone. Now this danger is not actually so great, for after falling a few times they would in the end certainly learn to walk; but an example of this kind makes men timid and usually frightens them out of all further attempts.

more
http://www.english.upenn.edu/~mgamer/Etexts/kant.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. What exactly are "gay rights"?
How does "gay rights" differ from human rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think that if you let the group do your thinking for you yes it is a bad thing.
If you come up with the same opinion that the group has and came up with it on your own, good.

The herd mentality is what gets us in trouble. The group or, DU political correctness, is a prejudiced view and does not take into account all factors. It is wrong to use peer pressure to get someone to act or think a certain way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Help_I_Live_In_Idaho Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. I Hate Political Correctness
Few people want to go around offending people, but the problem is that expressing an opinion is offensive to some people, being honest is offensive to many. Having a divergent view of religion, politics, sex differences, morality, philosophy, poetry, art, and love can and will offend people. And when you enforce political correctness you effectively shut down dialog and progress.

The fact is people choose to be offended. I am offended by racism and classicism and sexism but I don't let my being offended shut off my and others' right to free speech.

Better to be offended by words and thoughts than to have to pretend and lie about your beliefs and thoughts everywhere you go.
:hippie:

And, by the way, political correctness is worse in small hick republican towns. I live in one and the political correctness makes it like living in NAZI Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. 'The fact is people choose to be offended.' - blame the victim mentality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Help_I_Live_In_Idaho Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The point is free thought and speech are a right - to censor is to victimize
1. Go to China and offend government or officials. Then you will be a victim.

2. Who decides what to censor? If Bush had had that power there would be no Democratic Underground because it offends the conservatives.

3. If we were the ones who decided what to censor. There would be no republicans or conservatives and you would be jailed for conservative speech.

4. It is in the bill of rights and that is why you won't be jailed for saying shit or fuck, or bitch or dick.

5. I'm so sorry. I used bad words and I am offending and victimizing people - Oh, Please, let me make amends. Let me change your diapers. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Help_I_Live_In_Idaho Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Here Here - Tip one for me
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC