Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil market skewed by large investors?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
baghdad_bush Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:17 PM
Original message
Oil market skewed by large investors?
A panel of the top oil traders recent got together said that the price of oil is determined by four elements:

1. Supply & demand: Based on an annual demand growth rate of 5% and an equal increase production, oil should be at $45 to $50 per barrel

2. Socio-economic stability: The War in Iraq, the increase in terrorism, the distribution to the Iraqi oil supply and the continued threat of bin Laden have added another $35 or $80to $85

3. Iran: All the talk about Iran’s nuclear program and the sword waving by the US, Britain and Germany is costing us another $15 per barrel or $95 to $100

4. Finally, the Euro, which was worth $1 when Bush came into office, is now worth $1.56 – in other words, the dollar has lost 36% of its value – which takes us to $136 a barrel

So ask yourself why the media doesn’t address the fact that George Bushes pre-emptive war, and sword waving in the Middle East plus his HUGE deficit is the REAL reason that the oil price has risen and that it is not because of supply & demand, which at most has caused a $10 to $15 increase since the fascist pig took office.

An don’t forget, while we watched the price of gas soar, so did the oil companies’ profits with the BIG 5 raking in $200B in PROFIT in just one year.

WHY hasn’t the media covered this???

Two reasons: Bush has removed all control over the media in exchange for their political support and because they don’t want to jeopardize ad dollars. Nice.

http://www.energydigital.net/Energy/Oil-market-skewed-by-large-investors-_6068.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wars are good for ratings, which are good for corporate profit margins. War is very profitable.
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 05:26 PM by Selatius
You just have to be in an industry that benefits from war in order to see the profits. It stands to reason the corporate executives are applying pressure to kill stories that might mean decreased profit margins, such as putting the kibosh on a drumbeat to war by reporting stories that ask truly hard-hitting questions about the reasons for going to war.

If it pisses off the shareholders on the Board of Directors, it might die a quiet death on the editing room floor. You can talk to Katie Couric and others who are testifying they were under pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC