Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two words that will get the msm to do their jobs...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MotorCityMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:31 AM
Original message
Two words that will get the msm to do their jobs...
President Obama

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stellen Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hoped that would be the case, but after what I heard this morning
I have little hope. Bill Pres announced that MSNBC is "concerned" about the left wing bias KO brings to election coverage, and is thinking about removing him from that. KO says he'll walk if that happens.

GOD FORBID we get the truth from even one man in the whole of radio or television. I'm worried now that the right wing bias will just escalate. I'm totally fed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. welcome to DU Stellen!!
it's going to be a bumpy ride. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellen Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Thank you.
I'll fasten my seat belt. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. I was thinking more like "Sherman Anti-Trust" (if the hyphen makes it one word)...
I was also thinking something like "RICO violations," or "Class-Action Suit."

Too bad you can't appeal to "journalistic integrity." Unfortunately, speaking as somebody who used to be "one of them" back in the day, in the US the so-called free press has gradually redefined the phrase to suit the ethos of the times.

So "journalistic integrity," which used to be a professional canon, has devolved over the past 30 or so years to represent -- at various times -- an impediment, a convenient camouflage, total propagandist bullshit, a standing joke and now a universally understood oxymoron.

Too bad. It used to be a hell of a way to make a (very modest) living. Now it's the moral equivalent of working in a product development lab that tests pain thresholds by torturing live animals.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm looking forward to their new views on
Executive Privilege.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ha Ha Ha, yes their "New Views"
on Executive Privileges. Isn't that the truth. All of a sudden they will find all kinds of "new" questions to ask President Obama. "After all, it's their job to ask the hard questions", they will exclaim.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. blow job.
or it could be hyphenated as one word: blow-job.

the current lapdog media should be coming down with a bad case of rabies round about 1-21-09
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. They will suddenly remember that they are supposed to question
the President, instead of just delivering orally the White House press releases ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're correct, of course
and, after beating up Obama for years on minor issues, they'll suddenly say the public is tired of it when they stop questioning the next Republican president...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. How about this one "Fairness Doctrine"....?
Threaten those presstitutes with actually having to be balanced and they might begin to do it voluntarily...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The Fairness Doctrine and media reform are the things
we will be voting on at the NC Democratic Convention in June (approving should I say). We are sending the message to Washington with our congressional representatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. Which job?
Whoring for Big Money? They're already on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. expect no change there -- advertisers and marketeers demand RW sensationalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. Dead wrong
Edited on Thu Jun-05-08 09:26 AM by Echo In Light
Irrespective of who "the president" is {what a fuckin' joke, anyway}, the corporate/state nexus can always rely on their megaphone mouthpiece to pimp whatever falsity/spin/propaganda/obfuscation the powers that be want 'sold' to the public mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. We need to make it hard for them.
This is so such things as embedded journalism which was created by Nazi Germany isn't repeated as an American practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. The good news is, M$M has been in a panic over the internet
Some months back, C-SPAN covered a major pow-wow/conference of mainline media owners, CEOs, guru's, etc, who were visibly upset over their loss of control over the public mind.

It's easy to take it for granted, but imagine how fucked we'd be without it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yep.
It's the reason they are trying to gain control of it and the reason America is divided without common ground due to information and its availability and knowledge of what is reality and what is propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. And the bad news is garbage legislation like the (thankfully dead for the moment)...
..."Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" AKA S 1959.

I posted the other day that people who track these kinds of outrages say S 1959 will never make it out of committee and is effectively DOA. I confirmed that story with somebody else before posting, so I'm hoping this POS bill is, in fact, a corpse.

But, like sewage, repression always floats to the surface. The same day the death of S 1959 was announced, ol' Jumpin' Joementum (asshole - Tel Aviv) started blathering about how the Intertubes are breeding "Islamist Radicals" bent on the destruction of Israel. His solution, of course, involves censorship, a strategy beloved by all blue-nosed right wing repressed turds like this slime creature from hell.

This time it's Youtube, where Joe feels much of this indoctrinating material lives. To their tremendous credit, Youtube execs politely but firmly told him to take a flying fuck at the Third Reich.

But you know it'll be back again and again, in one stealth form or another, maybe hidden in the fine print of some resolution where a "nay" vote is politically toxic -- something like a proclamation designating, say, October 31st as "Support Our Troops or We'll Kick Your Ass and Happy Non-Denominational Pretend Veneration of the Souls of the Departed Which Don't Really Exist Day."

The war on (some) drugs provided the template for this crap. It also prepared the legal path toward voiding the Fourth Amendment and habeas corpus in "cases where the security of our nation is threatened." They're even using the same script.

Find some target group you want to mess with, run full background checks on the main members, set up full audio and video surveillance, tap the phones and monitor all internet activity, get an alert when somebody goes to a site like 9/11Truth.org, send in the undercover guy and give him a couple of weeks establishing credentials and befriending the alphas.

Next steps: if nobody's advocating or planning violence -- like tossing a brick through some corporate window -- do a little provocateuring and stir up some shit, aid and abet the process of planning and carrying out some meaningless act of random destruction featuring dud explosives that couldn't even harm one of Bushie's frogs, bring in a couple dozen heavily armed robocops, the provocateur's badge comes out, the cuffs click shut (once the obligatory beatings are over), into the cars, teary last looks at the streets for a very long time.

Mission accomplished. Terrorist cell exposed and eliminated. Dangerous people in custody. Plots exposed. Bomb- making materials seized. Homegrown terrorists linked to Iranian radicals. Cheney threatens Tehran with reprisals.

Sounds about right so far. Complete the story to fit your favorite apocalyptic scenarios.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Now that is a quite a duzy, Warren
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC