Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PRIOR TO 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:30 PM
Original message
PRIOR TO 9/11
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 10:31 PM by seemslikeadream
GO DENNIS




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did I miss something . . . ???
Edited on Mon Jun-09-08 10:32 PM by defendandprotect
What did he say?

Wiretapping prior to 9/11, I'll bet --- right?

Nope --- the warnings, the warnings!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Impeach bush for not listening to reports that we were going to be attacked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. IF YOU REMEMBER, what they did to try to block awareness of the many, many warnings . . .
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 02:57 PM by defendandprotect
was reduce them to "nothing specific" which was also untrue ---

For almost a year, there were warnings --- high quality from almost every nation --
many had specifics as it came nearer --

SO... PROPAGANDA... was also largely at play in this ---
BTW, my two senators --- Lautenberg/Menendez -- are right now trying to get the gov't PROPAGANDA
stopped --- they have legislation on this ---

So -- we kept hearing "...but it wasn't SPECIFIC" . . .??? !!!
Of course, it was heavy communication to the White House and all of our intelligence agencies and it was specific -- and to suggest it wasn't is as nutty as Rice claiming no one every thought about anyone running planes into towers???!!!

So -- really it was the r-w propaganda machine that once again kept truth from getting out to the public --- kept them from hearing the truth --!!

The most blatant example of this OPERATION IGNORE going on in the White House is told by Clarke, but also the Russians were adamant at getting this info over because they didn't want anything to be blamed on them!! Bush was so ignoring the info they were passing on --- with specifics such as pilot names, etc. -- that the Russians went to the United Nations Security Council for help.
Finally, in AUGUST 2001, the United Nations also sent their representatives to the White House and
to our various intelligence agencies to warn them of the imminent attacks.

AGAIN, it was all ignored!!!

All of this information has been buried by cover-ups, lies and propaganda ---
with cooperation with our corporate-press ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. GOP propaganda is highly successful/believe it-! People will still say: "but it wasn't specific" -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He said the pResident was warned and did nothing.
Tenet met with Bush 40 times to warn him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. August 6 2001
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. My whole family sat up straight to listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. hijack an aircraft
suspicious activity

DID NOTHING SPENT THE TIME ON VACATION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-09-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Tenet had briefed bush
August 17 follow up to bin Laden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Intelligence tracking this info must also have realized that it traced back to Bush . . .
let's not be naive ---

As soon as you understand Taliban/Al Qaeda, you understand --- C I A --- !!!
US/Bush-Cheney --

And, a lot of these people would have seen the connections in tracing the $$$ ---

Saudi Arabia --- come on . . . how more obvious could it be?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Condi's infamous "we didn't know" defense.
It wasn't that they didn't know about the hijackings. They did and we're cool with it. They just didn't know that planes could be used as missles. It really sounded like former CIA employees Al Qaida deviated from a script. Like Al Qaida was supposed to hijack the planes and fly them to Cuba for a long drawn out hostage ordeal. This would change the National subject on the stolen election. But instead Al Qaida flew the planes into buildings. Thus prompting "we didn't know."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC