Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Judiciary Hearing NOW on Coercive interrogation techniques

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:54 AM
Original message
Senate Judiciary Hearing NOW on Coercive interrogation techniques
Sorry, looks like it started at 9:30 am but sounds interesting so far.

Webcast from the Senate Judiciary Committee website: http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=3399

The hearing on “Coercive Interrogation Techniques: Do They Work, Are They Reliable, and What Did the FBI Know About Them?” scheduled by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary for Tuesday, June 10, 2008 in the Senate Dirksen Office Building, Room 226 will begin at 9:30 a.m. rather than the previously scheduled time of 10:00 a.m.

Senator Feinstein will preside.

By order of the Chairman

Witness List

Hearing before the
Senate Judiciary Committee

on

“Coercive Interrogation Techniques: Do They Work, Are They Reliable, and What Did the FBI Know About Them?”

Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Dirksen Senate Office Building Room 226
10:00 a.m.

Panel I:

The Honorable Glenn A. Fine
Inspector General
Department of Justice
Washington, DC

Valerie Caproni
General Counsel
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, DC

Panel II:

Jack Cloonan
Former FBI Special Agent
West Caldwell, NJ

Philippe Sands QC
Professor of Law and Director of the Centre of International Courts and Tribunals
University College London

Philip B. Heymann
James Barr Ames Professor of Law
Harvard Law School
Cambridge, MA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks
Watching now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. thanks minime!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You're welcome
:hi:

Its pretty interesting, its about torture technics and if they work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sands coming up on this panel n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Second panel just being introduced. INCLUDES PHILIPE SANDS
Includes a former FBI agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a surprise. Heavy handed techniques can impair a person't ability to answer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm at work and I had to go do something. Are they taking a break?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. OK, looks like they will be resuming at 2pm. I hope more people are watching
this afternoon. This issue should be near and dear to our hearts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hearings to resume at 2pm. This hearing is on coercive interrogation techniques
ie - torture. Philipe Sands is in this panel. This should be a great hearing, and about what the US is all about. It can only be viewed from the Judiciary Committee website: http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=3399

Starting in about 10 minutes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. The hearing has restarted. Philips Sands is giving his opening statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody else is interested in this?
This is the stuff we care about, I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. hey minime, I just can't get that website at work.
what is Sands saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thanks Alyce, I was beginning to think I was typing to myself again.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Philip Heymann saying that there is absolutely no reason to torture
But says that the words have lost their meaning. Said that they have banned torture, but doesn't think that water boarding is torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Heymann says that there is no definition of what is cruel and unusual or not allowed
Just that everybody agrees that torture is banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. More from DiFi re: using the Army interrogation manual as the standard
for everything.

Whitehouse up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Whitehouse: VP comparing WB'ing to a dunk in the water, and
stress positions as standing beside the desk. Is it torture.

Cloone says wb'ing is an extreme technique, it should be considered torture. Stress positions also torture, and their description is wrong.

Sands agrees that it is torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. Whitehouse says either those indiv's are very naive, or they are misleading
Sands says your first part is way too generous. He basically says of course they are doing it to decieve intentionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Whitehouse got them to say that Justice Department working hand in hand
with the countertism department and the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
20. Heymenn just blasted * on special powers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't think that any repukes showed up for this hearing
I only caught the end of the hearing this morning with the first panel, and I only heard Schumer, DiFi, Cardin, and Whitehouse speak. So far this afternoon, I have only heard DiFi and Whitehouse. I can't believe that none of the repukes showed up to try to weaken this message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks for the thread
I was able to catch some of it, but it kept timing out on my computer. Just wanted you to know you weren't alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Not many senators there, but a fascinating discussion
Glad I wasn't alone. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I read from the other thread here, that a repig shut down the
Committee by doing something like calling a recess or something??? These repigs are getting very desperate aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Interesting. But they held it anyway with just a few Senators
I don't know if the minority can call a recess, but who knows? Senate rules are strange sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC