Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich is a distraction, sorry, that's the way I feel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:57 AM
Original message
Kucinich is a distraction, sorry, that's the way I feel
Booshe isn't getting impeached, not with 8 months to go in his term of errors. And I personally think Kucinich waiting until now to read the articles into the record is an insult to Obama. This is a bad time to give the Reich wing fodder to attack Obama and put him in the middle of this ploy while Kucinich gets lots of press and love from the left for something he should have done as early as 2006.

Yes, I know, Scotty and the Senate report have now added new fuel to the fire, but we NEED to get Barack Obama elected, not spend 8 months trying to impeach a lame duck moran . Kucinich needs to endorse Obama also, and stop being self-centered.


That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, the distraction is chucky cheese has unruly parents while Bushy
travels Europe looking for support to make war with Iran....

At least lets be for real just who is doing the distracting and why and why Impeachment is the only answer to stop this war machine administration from succeeding any more than they already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
:thumbsup:

One correction: He won't get a lot of press outside of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. In order to be a distraction, you have to get attention.
And Dennis told his supporters to vote for Obama months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. And, this is about Bush crimes, not your feelings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What will this accomplish?
Nancy and Harry "who me take action" Reid have already stated impeachment is off the table, and the Reich wing in Congress can block any attempt to move it to the floor, they have already neutered Reid from accomplishing anything, so what is the point?

He should have done this in 2006 when it MEANT something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. He has been doing things
but has been hampered at every turn. Sometimes it is important to simply state the facts for the record. That is what Kucinich did. Hardly any press attention, either, so the argument you make in your OP is flawed. Also, Kucinich told his supporters long ago to back Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I'm not the only poster here who is flawed.
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
92. That was a reference to logic being flawed, not you.
But, since you are bramaged, we'll let you get away with the claim. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I think one factor in the timing is that with the release of McClellan's book
And that since McClellan basically confesses to aiding and abetting the conspiracies that the Bush administration has dealt this country and the world, he can be offered immunity in return for his testimony about what went down.

Especially in the outing of valerie Plame. He identifies the players and their specific actions and roles. And in terms of other events as well - perhaps the Cheney "energy" talks that were held in secret (and we now know were about the maps of oil rich Iraq) Et Cetera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. and McClellan's upcoming testimony.
nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. I mentioned that. Should I have used larger text?

Like this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. You did mention it but in a dismissive way. And since impeachment is very much
A legal event and struggle, certain things must show up before the die is cast.

Nixon's impeachment trial would not have happened if the tapes had not surfaced to provide testimony of what had gone down over Watergate. And likewise, Kucinich has needed a credible witness - McClellan will provide that. (Unless he suddenly "suicides!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Dismissive? Pardon me wait let me improve on my op OK

Yes, I know, Scotty and the Senate report have now added new fuel to the fire

and I KNOW that he is two years too late for this to have ANY effect on the misAdministration, but once again, if he is a man of his convictions, why did he wait till it was useless and just a stunt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #50
65. You don't like the McClellan answer, so I'll add this:
THE HANDWRITING IS ON THE WALL. BIG TIME.

THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA, ESPECIALLY CNN AND WOLF BLITZER et al WENT DOWN TO GLORIOUS DEFEAT IN THE LAST TWO WEEKS.

OBAMA IS THE PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE. CLINTON HAS BOWED OUT.
MAINSTREAM AMERICAN GUY AND GAL NO LONGER LISTENS TO MAINSTREAM MEDIA. THE PROOF IS IN WHAT WENT DOWN OVER THE LAST TWO WEEKS. THEY (THE M$M) BLATHERED AND BLATHERED ABOUT CLNTON"S EXPERTISE EXPERIENCE AND OSAMA'S {OOPS! OBAMA'S) MUSLIM-NESS.

WE IGNORED THEM!!

Kucinich saw that the tide had turned. The opportunity to impeach is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. A statement of intent. A declaration of belief.
"so what is the point?"

A statement of intent. A declaration of belief. An affirmation of his convictions.

Regardless of whether he does it on your timetable or his is, I believe quite irrelevant-- as it still means something; maybe not to you, but it does to me and to a lot of other people by the look or it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
62. Sorry I disagree, but as I have learned here, disagreement is frowned upon
It never was like this when DU was in it's infancy.


That's ok I have a real life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #62
89. Some frown on disagreement while others embrace it
Some frown on disagreement while others embrace it (for all the relevancy that has...).

I can't speak to the infancy of DU as I've only been here since early 2001.

I imagine we all have real lives (again, for all the relevancy that has...) :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
69. Kucinich's resolution definitely sheds light on
The righteousness of thsoe of us who want election reform.

He is indicting Bush, Cheney and Blackwell for their conducting the Presidential election of 2004 in Ohio in an illegal fashion.

Hear! Hear!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
85. It will begin to allow us to regain a shred of dignity in the world.
That is important.

For the administration to get off with all of this...

The American populace will continue to bear the brunt of resentment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. That will not happen till Obama takes the oath of office
How anyone here thinks this is worth of any attention other than to rabid Kuspinach fans is beyond me. He should be trying to block funding the war than something as impossible as this.. And regarding him 'reading into the record' history will do a better job of exposing Booshe for what he really is than the Congressional record.

How many of you have read the Congressional record and how many of you read it like it was the Bible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #87
99. Name calling for Kucinich? That speaks volumes.
Maybe it is time that people begin to look at the larger picture.

The US populace has lost much of it's good will from the world, due in large part to the fact that we have allowed the crimes to continue without serious response. We are looked upon as enablers at best, and accomplices at worst.

It is long past time for people to stand up and demand accountability for the crimes against our nation and the world. We are the only ones that can accomplish this if we wish to regain our position as a world citizenry in good standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. One hand washes the other
Change in the executive branch, and spine in the legislative.

That is the ticket to a new Dem Majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Yes. I agree. This is good for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Since the majority of the MSM has ignored the introduction
of articles of impeachment, I don't believe your argument holds water. I have yet to hear any pundit or rw blogger mention this, so how in the world could it "insult" or even hurt Obama's chances?

Kucinich did this so there is a public record of Bush's crimes. So there is a public record that at least some people in the US recognized Bush for the criminal he is. Kucinich did this for me, my husband, and all peace loving Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Why did he wait till now? He would have done it for EVERYONE
if he did this earlier. So you think because I disagree with this, I'm not a peace loving American? Nice of you to frame me as such. You've learned a wonderful Reich wing trick.

Let me frame your response this way. I think KooKoo needs to be in the spotlight, and what better way than to stir up a hornet's nest knowing his articles will go nowhere, other than to garner attention to himself and all of the 'peace loving' Americans who support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I thought that old boys network was dead.
Their motto. There is no list of crimes too tall to prevent us from overlooking them for the right price. So they are gonna give us a win in the election to overlook war crimes and crimes against humanity.

How corrupt is that? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Televison headlines broadcasting indisputable evidence that Bu*h commited criminal acts
seems to me like it would propel Barack into the White House on a landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. So, you think the MSM will report this like the stain on a dress?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. It will come to the point where they'll have no choice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. The Repubs can vouch for that
They took the WH in 2000 after their failed attempt to impeach Clinton, even though they did it with the help of the SCOTUS and election fraud. There were enough votes for Bush** to make the steal possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
64. Failed?
Clinton was IMPEACHED.

He was not indicted.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. I stand corrected
My point is they failed to remove him from office, and despite most Americans seeing their attempt for the petty trick it was the Repubs still held Congress and took the WH in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. An insult to Obama?
OMG.

How does every-freakin'-thing end up as an "insult to Obama."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. How can he be a distraction if nobody covers it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. you hit the nail on the head....these distraction posts are getting boring.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:17 PM by AuntPatsy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
54. An H. L. Mencken quote sums them up very well...
"It reminds me of a string of wet sponges; it reminds me of tattered washing on the line; it reminds me of stale bean soup, of college yells, of dogs barking idiotically through endless nights. It is so bad that a sort of grandeur creeps into it. It drags itself out of the dark abysm of pish, and crawls insanely up the topmost pinnacle of posh. It is rumble and bumble. It is flap and doodle. It is balder and dash."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
63. It is a distraction only for
those who are incapable of thinking of more than one thing at a time. Perhaps that is why we are in the mess we are in. It is all about winning the next race and that is the only thing worth thinking of, even if it means letting the criminals continue to rape our constitution without abate.

This is unconscionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
108. And if nobody covers it, then why are roses being thrown at Kucinich's feet for it?
If he's introducing an impeachment which has no chance of passing and nobody is covering, then it's no more standing up to Bush than me driving out to the country and yelling "Bush sucks ass" at the top of my lungs. And it has no more impact on changing the course of the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. Stopping a war in Iran is more important that electing Obama
Obama also threatens war on Iran, he enables Bush's lies about Iran being a threat.

I think that stopping our country from killing millions more innocent people is more important, but that's just me.

Why isn't Kucinich introducing Impeachment the top headline in the blogosphere?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3419867&mesg_id=3419867
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Oh boy so Obama threatens war on Iran?
Who wants to negotiate with the Iranians? Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Obama apparently ignores the evidence stating Iran is not a threat
because he continues to repeat this in his speeches. By pretending along with Bush, he is enabling these lies to continue, giving them validity. It is not just Obama, but almost the entire US Congress that plays along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Sure, keep playing that rock and roll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
93. What BS. There is no war in Iran to stop. Obama wants to stop the one in Iraq!
Electing Obama is how to stop the war!
What is with the illogical convolutions? Axe to grind? Or, just disrupting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. There was not one mention of what Kucinich
did in either morning paper here, nor have I seen anything about it on TV. This is at most a symbolic gesture at this time. The Democrats should have been reading each one of these crimes into the record as they happened, not waiting until it is far too late to do anything about them. But at least they are in the record now, which is something, and it might help with prosecutions later, if any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Absolutely, as I stated, why wait till now?
Sad that he is alone in this, but I think the country just wants to get through the next 8 months and get on with their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. I disagree with your analysis on every point. In fact, your asking DUers why
now, and telling us what you think the country wants is rather pathetic.

Why not call or write the congressman and ask him?

Why did you wait until now to come out against impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Wrong again, sorry I disagree with so many of you
one last time

WHY DIDN'T HE DO THIS IN 2006 INSTEAD OF WAITING UNTIL THERE IS ONLY EIGHT MONTHS LEFT IN BOOSHE'S PRESIDENCY, KNOWING THIS WILL GO NOWWHERE?



Get a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. I predict you aren't long for this world known as DU. Good luck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
107. Maybe if you read my profile you would actually see how long I've been here
And since you think you are the judge and jury on DU for those of us who don't bow to the altar you worship at, and you are offended by contrary opinion, maybe it's time you do a little of your own self-reflection and stop trying to bait me into getting banned, or better yet, calling me out because I disagree with you. That too is against the rules chum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
68. Have you always been
a bully when people disagree with you?

I totally disagree with you.

I would love to see that criminal brought to justice and to piece the Constitution back together.

If he is not held accountable for the terrible war crimes he and his VP have committed then who?

Kucinich is not the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. Sorry I didn't sugar coat my response to your liking
and sorry I'm not all flowers and platitudes when I respond, but your assumption is typical of a person addled with keyboarditis.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. No
it is the rude things you are writing from your keyboard.

You posted flame bait -

Now you get to read what we think about it.

Or

not.

But calling people names is really uncalled for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. Put me on ignore, than you don't have to read dick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
83. and against DU rules! eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. You bet, so is anyone calling someone out because they disagree with that someone
You all have the option of the red x. Use it if you feel offended by any one's position. You can all become ostriches.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
91. Have you...
"WHY DIDN'T HE DO THIS IN 2006"

Have you asked his office? Seems that if anyone's in the know, it would be his own office.... :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Feelings are personal. Everyone has them. But from a
thinking perspective I believe Kucinich is doing Obama a very great favor here.

As the right wing gears up to accuse Obama of being a Marxist/Leninist/ ultra lefty, Dennis is publicly and forcefully occupying a slot to the left of Obama.

This makes Obama look much more mainstream by comparison.

It also articulates why America wouldn't want another 4 years of bush criminality.

Instead of looking for who you can dis and hate and be annoyed with, perhaps you might consider how everyone everywhere needs to do their part to bring about real change. I welcome Congressman Kucinich's efforts.

That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. I see you call me names instead of addressing the points I made.
Now you can dis and hate me as well as Kucinich, eh?

At least you are consistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. We're done, goodbye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Uh-oh! Naughty, naughty. That's not allowed here. Better toe the impeachment line, or else.
The reality is that impeachment will never fly in an election year. It does, however, allow people to become all noble and self righteous about impeachment, labeling those who do not agree as DINOs or not caring about the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I'm a baddddddd boy, and so many will hate me for even mentioning this
but that's ok, DU isn't my life. I will survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Yeah, not point in getting your feelings hurt by a bunch of anonymous posters.
However, if they knew who you really were and where you lived it would be pitchfork and torch time, just like any good Republican might do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
74. That's it
all of us who disagree with your friend are insane, crazy murderers.

That is sensible ....:eyes:

Comparing those of us who are for the impeachment of a war criminal, baby killer to Republicans makes zero sense.

ZERO

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
80. DID YOU KNOW YOU ARE MY FRIEND?
WOW can we like hang out some time?


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. How can it be a distraction if DK gets very little to no press...?
How can it be a distraction if DK gets very little to no press...?

Don't distractions, by their very nature need to be advertised rather loudly to be effective?

If that is indeed the case, then it would seem this is not a distraction, but merely a man holding declaring his convictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. yeah right!
I wish they were using it as a distraction!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
38. Seems to me he's doing his job, is he not?
I'm sure he'll do what he can/needs to do to help the party elect Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
78. Good point
If the other members of Congress would do their job, we would not have an emperor.

Checks and balances... It is 7th grade civics.

As it is, the ass's get away with killing millions of people and taking over their country while using our own youth to carry out the orders of a handful of depraved psychopaths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
40. Defending our Constitution is a distraction!? WTF!?
:banghead: Let the murderers get away with it? HELL NO !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
41. Hey Drain, it's could be that he pulled it out to ride on the wave that McClellan's book brought in
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:33 PM by lynnertic
the one where McClellan writes that the Administration ignored exculpatory evidence to go to war (LIED) and that the White House was behind the leak of Valerie Plame's name.

It could also be that he chose to spend all this time reading articles of impeachment because there's another vote he didn't want to happen (war funding maybe?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. It's Dain and once again, maybe next time I'll use larger text

in my OP

so you understand I already covered your brilliant idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
57. you assume I'll bother to read it! :)
sorry for the spelling etc. I need glasses :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedLetterRev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. Actually, it was very clever
on Mr Kucinich's part. Note that he didn't introduce the resolution (which may not have allowed him to read the entirety into the Congressional Record) -- he introduced a question ON the resolution, which did allow him the floor time to read the entirety into the record. Regardless of the outcome (yes, I'd hope for a thorough investigation down to dog-catcher level and impeachment), the list of alleged crimes with bases for the allegations is now and forevermore a part of the record. Let that stinking albatross hang firmly around the neocons' and their rubber-stamping henchmen's necks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
72. I just hope they don't start
treating the Congressional Record the same way they did the WH e-mails.
Perhaps chimpy will abolish Congress as a National Security threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
43. having a hard time focusing on your bread and circuses?
what distraction are you talking about?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. circuses?
Did you mean croissants? Or is there something in my youth I missed out on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
45. The BEST that can be said about this
...is the articles will now be in the Congressional record.

Impeachment of Bush/Cheney will never happen, sorry -- and for the same reason I can't ride my beautiful motorcycle: the battery is dead.

In other words, Impeachment is a lovely idea, but the Democrats lack the power to proceed with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Bingo, so will you cut the ropes attaching me to the stake over the firepit
the Kunichichinich supporters have strung me up on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. No he won't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Thanks, I'm taking you out of the will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #59
105. LOL
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
104. I would if I could
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. As is demonstrated in the windfall profit tax on big oil this a.m. I
would sure like to know if any dems voted against it. No record of the vote is posted yet! I wanna see it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedLetterRev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
61. Exactly the point
Kucinich used a procedural move to allow the entirety of the resolution to be entered into the Record. The actual resolution hasn't been introduced -- only a question ON the resolution. (If he had introduced the resolution directly, a motion could have been made to dispense with the reading.) Now all of the allegations to date are a matter of public record and in such a place where BushCo can't respond, spin or obsfuscate in kind. They can only defend themselves against what's contained in a question on a resolution -- probably a worse burden than defending against a resolution to impeach head-on. I hope their heads explode trying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #45
101. They lack the will, not the power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
55. Congressman Wexler Consponsors Bush Impeachment
Congressman Wexler Consponsors Bush Impeachment
Submitted by davidswanson on Tue, 2008-06-10 17:14. Impeachment

(Washington, DC) Today, Congressman Robert Wexler (D-FL), a senior member of the House Judiciary Committee, signed onto Congressman Dennis Kucinich's (D-OH) Articles of Impeachment against President George W. Bush. The Articles outline numerous allegations against President Bush, including his creation of a massive propaganda campaign to mislead the nation into war with Iraq, the illegal use of torture during interrogation, the authorization of a warrantless wiretapping program on American citizens, and the repetitive use of signing statements to negate legislation passed by Congress.


http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/33988
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #55
67. Yeah Wexler. And he is only a Senior Member of the Judiciary Committee.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:30 PM by truedelphi
I'll repeat that part of your post as no one should avoid thinking about what that means.

The testicles are in the vise grip and now is the time.

It is one way available for us to avoid the Bush planned war against Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #55
77. I hope everyone from HRes333 signs up on this one too.
Plus many more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #55
94. The line is forming at the re-election door!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
58. You're nicer than I am...I just think he's a fucking idiot.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
60. Those above the law are never a lame duck.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:01 PM by mmonk
Neither is his movement as long as no truth and justice and correction occur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
66. apology accepted
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
71. If it distracts them from attacking Iran, I SAY GO FOR IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #71
109. Indeed!
Which it WOULD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
79. We Can't Even Get An Emergency Energy Package Through
And people think the Senate has any appetite to impeach?

It's amazing...yesterday some serious shit came out regarding Abramoff's connections to boooosh & rove...not a damn thread on that revelation. Yes...priorities need to be focused on the practical, not the impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. Thank you for seeing through the fog
Yes, what was it SIX personal meetings with Jackmeoff and not a word here about how serious this is?

Pathetic. Watch out for the ton of bricks from Kunichichnichnch's supporters for discussing the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
81. The people currently charging $4.50 for regular gas in LA consider him a distraction.
Choose your distractions, and distractors, wisely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
84. F that
It is clear that an important part of this election comes down to McCain = Bush.

Kucinich is showing that Bush = piece of shit.

Therefore, McCain = piece of shit.

QED








plus, nobody in the real world is even going to hear about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
88. this has nothing to do with Obama, its about stopping war with Iran
If you get impeachment for lies about the war in Iraq out in the Press, that reduces the chances that anyone will believe them about Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Stop the funding and you stop the war, simple isn't it
Why didn't he introduce a resolution demanding that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #90
97. how much funding is needed for the selective air strikes they are talking about???
And why wouldnt Bush just pull funding from the VA or something else that is actually needed??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #88
95. HELLO!! There is no war with Iran. This is not about clairvoyance, it is about high crimes.
"Resolved, that President George W. Bush be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors ..."

Read the text!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #95
96. He meant Iraq
Got to go, will absorb excessive insults later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #95
98. its about PREVENTING the NEXT war
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 03:07 PM by LSK
I watched about 2 hours of it last night. Why are you reading me the beginning of it?

What is your point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
100. Your posts designed to undermine a DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE
are duly noted.

Please consult your rule book. If you don't have something nice to say about a Dem candidate, don't say anything at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. Second that. Where's the tombstone when you need it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. So you don't like a difference of opinion here?
You are right as is my 'friend' I am ignoring, where is that tombstone when you need it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFriendlyAnarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
102. I think now that the primaries are over, this could actually unite the dems
more than anything else, as opposed to dividing us with our opinions depending on what our favorite candidate thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
110. It's only a distraction
if you are limited enough to believe that the only thing that will "save" us is electing a Democrat to the WH in November.

Our Constitution, and the rule of law, and the duties of our corrupt politicians, are more important in the short and long run than any particular election or candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
111. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC