Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Second highest corporate tax rate in the world"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:47 PM
Original message
"Second highest corporate tax rate in the world"
"second only to Japan, where the economy is stagnating".. This from some McSame campaign spokesthing to Nora ODonnell on msnbc just now . Of course the large-mouthed one didn't ask her to back up this statement, or reference it... and couldn't be expected to know anything about anything, so the statement just went out there...

This sounds like a load of horseshit to me..so I google..and sure enough from smartmoney.com
http://www.smartmoney.com/invisiblehand/index.cfm?story=20080125-corporate-tax-rate

It turns out that "broad exemptions and industry-specific perks have turned our tax code into Swiss cheese feeding a regiment of millionaire tax lawyers".

WE are going to hear a lot of this kind of garbage between now &November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Taxes are bad for business
But good for workers?

Why do people buy this BS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. There shouldn't be a corporate tax.
Why hurt the employees of a company, when it's really the stockholders who should be paying?

The corporate tax doesn't come out of some rich guys dividend, it comes out of the poor guys paycheck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If you dont want it to come out of the poor guys paycheck.
you make the corporate tax based upon the difference between the highest paid executives and the lowest paid workers including foreign workers. that would encourage the executives to either lower their pay and perks or raise their employees pay to get rid of the tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klyon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. tax business not workers
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. How Do You Figure? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Straight from the AEI. Of course, they're not telling you that 60% of all US companies pay NO taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Yup, high rate
...and loopholes you could drive a tanker through. The bigger you are, the bigger the holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifetimedem Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you for the sources..
I know Europe has a heavy tax burden ...so that claim never "smelled " right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Back In The 50s And 60s, Corporate Taxes Were Much Higher
But, somehow, GDP grew faster than today, and median wages went up quickly rather than stagnating as they have today.

Imagine that. Must have been magic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh gee I'm sorry my friend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. There's a big difference between "effective" and "marginal" rates
Effective is simply what they paid divided by what they earn. Marginal means what the rate is on the adjusted income (income after deductions credits ect). The difference can be especially huge with all the different credits and deductions they've built into the corporate tax system over they years. When folks like the AEI spin they are talking about marginal rates not what is actually paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC