Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guardian UK: Everything...to bring the age of heroic consumption to its close should be done

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:36 PM
Original message
Guardian UK: Everything...to bring the age of heroic consumption to its close should be done
Consuming passions
Everything that can be done to bring the age of heroic consumption to its close should be done

Jeremy Seabrook guardian.co.uk, Tuesday June 10 2008


The age of heroic consumption is surely drawing to a close. The inspiration of those whose principal virtue is the money that permits them to lay claim to a disproportionate share of the earth's resources is being by-passed in a world where a population of 9 billion must be accommodated by 2050.

The price tag on the possessions of the wealthy - their £10m mansions, £5m yachts, extravagant couture and priceless jewels, their private jets and lives apart from the great majority of humankind - are rapidly losing their power to enchant the rest of us. In an age when scientists, humanitarians and moral leaders are exhorting human beings to look to our impact upon the earth - and not solely in relation to the carbon footprint - it has become obsolete to gaze with breathless admiration upon individuals dedicated to the proposition that a whole world should be dying of consumption, and not just the 1.6m who perish from tuberculosis each year.

The greatest threat to global stability comes not from the poor but from the rich. This startling proposition runs directly into another received idea, which is that the risk of disorder is a result of excessive materialism. What we suffer from is not a surfeit of materialism, but a deficiency of it; for if we truly valued the material basis upon which all human systems depend, we would exhibit a far greater reverence for the physical world we inhabit. If materialism means respect for the elements that sustain life, then we are gravely wanting in it. What is sometimes referred to as "materialism" is actually something else: perhaps a distorted kind of mysticism which believes we can use up the earth and still avoid the consequences of our omnivorous appetites.

This is why the gross consumers of the age will be scorned as the pitiable destroyers of the sustenance, not only of the poor of today, but of everyone's tomorrow. It is natural for people to want to do the best for their children, but this is generally interpreted as leaving them a private monetary inheritance; but if the other side of this legacy is a befouled world, the enjoyment of today's privilege may become the curse of the future. In any case, there is a great deal of humbug in pious concern expressed for our children's children, since this rarely prevents those who give voice to such tender sentiments from living as though there were no tomorrow. "Live the dream" has become the cliche of the hour; although it requires no great wisdom to understand that dreams realised soon turn to ashes.

Everything that can be done to bring the age of heroic consumption to its close should be done. This means the promotion of a different understanding of wealth. The myriad aspects of a truly rich and fulfilled life should be rescued from the tyranny of money. Perhaps we have not entirely forgotten that the most joyful and exhilarating of human occupations derive from self-reliance, self-provisioning, not only in the basic goods that sustain life, but also in satisfactions that arise from the cost-free resourcefulness of ourselves and others. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jun/10/consumeraffairs.consumerandethicalliving




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Scientists called for social change long ago re Global Warming ---
As far as I can see, Mother Nature is now forcing those changes upon us ---

Meanwhile, it would be difficult not to understand that patriarchy, organized patriarchal religions and capitalism are suicidal concepts --- !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "Mother Nature is now forcing those changes upon us"
True that. As one of the featured guests in the film "Crude Impact" said, when you don't want to negotiate your way of life (as Cheney described America's position), then Mother Nature stops negotiating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PunkinPi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. the last paragraph says it all
Human beings want, above all, to survive. The moral and social elevation of the wealthy and their profligacy suggests that they are prepared to sacrifice even this hitherto imperishable goal for the sake of transforming the beauty and value of the world into a wasteland. Enslavement to a reductive, diminished version of what it means to lead a rich life is still bondage; and when it must be protected by razor wire, guns, security guards and impregnable barriers, these become the very symbols of that unfreedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:59 PM
Original message
That is a great graph.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good to read. Thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. John Perkins author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (Youtube video)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=e0JCJ4pIFEw

Quote:
"This incredible prosperity that we enjoy here is built on an empire. It's built on slavery and servitude and tremendous suffering. We don't stop to think about the fact that we represent less than 5% of the worlds population, and we consume more than 25% of the world's resources."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Mega-taxation for Mega-consumers is the ONLY way.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Consumption tax.
I believe I had a stroke when a family member mentioned, off-hand, that they couldn't "survive" on anything less then 10x my total monthly expenditures. I went from calm and collected to raving mania in 0.2 seconds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. First 50K...tax free for at least a decade
51-100K 5%
101-200K 10%
201-400K 20%
400-500K 35%
500K-up 50%

NO deductions..ALL income included..EVEN "investments"

In about a decade, we would be back on a firm footing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's an income tax. I'm talking consumption....
People who can't live without lots and lots of stuff or spending several days at the mall (or on Amazon.com) would pay the brunt. Lots of details to iron out (food, housing, vehicle exemptions, etc...) but I'm not going to engage in that discussion. Suffice to say that people who consume more would support those who choose to live with less and within their means.

With a consumption tax, the IRS is history, and who could argue with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Across the board consumption taxes are brutal to poor people
since they have so little to start with..but LUXURY taxes used to be imposed here in the US, and they did work.. Jewelry, fur(ick), and other "luxuries" had a federal excise tax on it.

Re-instating luxury taxes for gas guzzlers, mcmansions, and a ton of other stuff could help out..but noton basics of life..poor folks get hit the hardest, since every dime they make is used just to stay alive.. they have few, if any luxuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC