Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's big speech yesterday about windfall profits tax but didn't bother

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:29 PM
Original message
Obama's big speech yesterday about windfall profits tax but didn't bother
to show up to vote today??

I watched Democracy Now! this morning with a clip of BHO calling for a windfall profit tax and how he's spend it to 'help the middle class' but then switched over to CSPAN and his name was on the list of Senators not voting on that very issue.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary didn't vote either, nor did McCain
can we give this beat up the candidate shit a rest this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. and neither did Kennedy or Byrd, but they had a good reason to miss the vote
McCain can piss up a rope as far as I'm concerned and Hillary isn't our candidate although that doesn't excuse her either.

I'm not trying to 'beat up the candidate' but on key legislation like this they ALL need to show up.

He's still a Senator and we need to show he's willing to put up with a bit of inconvenience to do his job IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Yeah we did that in 2004 too
Everybody had to have their own criteria for what the candidate had to do. It was very effective, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. we're Democrats, we don't 'do' lockstep.
I can comment on my candidate's choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeah, that was the excuse in 2004 too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gullwing300 Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Neither did Wellstone.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. There's a rule against stalking
in case you weren't aware. And if you think you can stalk me into doing something to get banned, well better people have tried. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's rather odd. Maybe he knew it would fail? I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's missed a lot of votes
There was some thread here today about who had the most liberal voting record, and from the numbers, it looked as if Obama had missed more votes than any other Democrat except Senator Johnson from South Dakota (who was ill for months). Hillary had missed a number as well, but nowhere near as many as Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't care if he misses the "Dairy Appreciation Month" votes but I'm pretty unhappy
he didn't show up to vote on the very bill he was touting the day before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why do you bring up Obama's poor voting record now that he's the presumptive Dem nominee? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think in this case it was because of the obvious disconnect
between the speech and his subsequent actions. Presumably it is still (and will be) all right to point these things out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. exactly! I'm voting for the guy and working for him this fall, I'm a Democrat!
but I still get to hold his feet to the fire if he's claiming to represent me and my party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. What AZDemDist6 said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I hope so because IMO censoring such statements would be most un-democratic. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm not talking about his "record" I'm talking about TODAY
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 07:42 PM by AZDemDist6
he didn't vote TODAY for legislation he highlighted in a campaign speech YESTERDAY


It just makes me shake my head.... :banghead:


edit to add, who said "poor voting record" ??? I sure didn't!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. My point is Obama has not Changed although many voted for him expecting Change. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ahhhh....
I did read your remark two different ways! Thanks for explaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. um, I gather you don't know that the whip vote counts? Durbin
knows whether or not they've got the votes. If they don't, the vote itself is simply a formality. In other words, Obama's vote wasn't needed and wouldn't have made a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes, but he and Hillary both flew back to vote on some other bill
I'm sorry I can't remember it right now in which their votes likewise probably didn't matter. I think the poster thinks that the gesture would have been a nice touch. You'd also think he could have lobbied for it. This vote aside, his Senate presence has been really minimal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. It makes a difference to those who look to a politician to support their position. I wonder if we
will have a cadre of apologists to spin every word spoken and action not taken by Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I do understand that, but sometimes the appearance of things is important
and IMHO this was one of the those times.

with Kennedy and Byrd, Clinton and Obama, we'd have 57 votes. only 3 away from the 60 needed to do any damn thing.

It's about solidarity and putting your body where your mouth is.

I do that. and I think my candidate should too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. What AZDemDist6 said. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC