Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClellan:I’m ‘sure’ White House will consider invoking executive privilege

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:52 AM
Original message
McClellan:I’m ‘sure’ White House will consider invoking executive privilege
McClellan on his testimony: I’m ‘sure’ White House will consider invoking executive privilege
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/11/mcclellan-on-his-testimony-im-%e2%80%98sure%e2%80%99-white-house-will-consider-invoking-executive-privilege/

Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan has agreed to testify, under oath, to the House Judiciary Committee on June 20. Yesterday at a book reading in Washington, DC, McClellan said that he expects the White House to think about invoking executive privilege before he goes before Congress:

When asked if his testimony next week might prompt any invoking of executive privilege - a power which can allow the president to block testimony- McClellan said, “I don’t have anything incriminating to say here if that’s what you’re looking for.

“Well I imagine if Congress tries to go into other issues, ones I haven’t spoken about in the book, I’m sure the White House would think seriously about that.“

In May, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino raised the possibility that the White House could block McClellan from testifying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. If they do
It will pretty much prove they are guilty as hell, and afraid of what might be said. This administration makes me sick! :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Personally, I would've been more inclined to forgive---
a LITTLE---if Scotty's epiphany had been worked like this:

1) Offer, through back-channels, to testify before Congress;
2) Book emerges.

A timing ambush on W&Co would've seemed more believable, gotten less interference. Now, I'm doubtful that McClellen's "conversion" is will turn out to produce more than "sound and fury, signifying nothing."

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GracieMansion Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. who cares what scotty the liar says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC