Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain campaign "hits back" on the "not too important" remarks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:20 AM
Original message
McCain campaign "hits back" on the "not too important" remarks
pretty weak response. And is the "our friends" remark really necessary? SO LAME. I think the dismissiveness that McCain has shown about the timing of bringing the troops home IS important. No one is implying that he "doesn't care" about the troops, but I think that it shows an out of touch dismissiveness in families and soldiers that DO want to go home right now and are not buying into the "finish what we started because we are patriots" bullshit that Republicans/the white house try to insist is the uniform opinion of soliders and their families. If McCain wants to use Obama's "bitter" remarks to claim he's out of touch, they have no business whining that we are trying to twist his words.




http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06...


McCain Campaign Hits Back Over "Not Too Important" Quote
By Greg Sargent - June 11, 2008, 10:36AM
The McCain campaign has sent me a statement on the quote we posted on below, in which McCain appeared to say that the timing of when the troops in Iraq come home is "not too important."

"The story is snowballing rapidly. Dem leader Harry Reid has already hit McCain over the remarks today, and more Dems will be piling on shortly. Indeed, the Obama campaign is holding a conference call on this later this morning.

Here's what McCain's online guru, Patrick Hynes, sent over...

Sen. McCain has consistently opposed a timeline for withdrawing our troops from Iraq. And our friends on the opposite side of the aisle have a long history of attempting to twist Sen. McCain's words on Iraq. The fact that Sen. McCain opposes a timeline for withdrawal and is principally concerned about the safety of American troops and the security of Iraq is pretty much "dog bites man."
Of course, McCain did actually say the timing of when the troops come hope is "not too important." But in fairness to the McCain camp, they are arguing that he didn't say that the act of bringing the troops home is not too important.

Rather, they say, McCain merely meant that the timing of when they come home is not too important.

This strikes me as a not terribly meaningful distinction, and it isn't a great way to characterize the timing issue, given that it's obviously extremely important to many people. But it is a distinction worth noting nonetheless, because it's true that the question McCain answered was about the timing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 10:35 AM by ErinBerin84
also, McCain still has a son in Iraq, right? Do you think that the Republicans would politicize that eventually ? That would actually make me feel really badly for McCain, because I don't think that he wants to bring it up and it could become a safety issue for his son, but I wouldn't put it past Republicans because they tend not to think about those things. Just like I would be pissed if Democrats tried to politicize Jim Webb's son being in Iraq as a defense, because he is equally sensitive about the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC