Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'True Majority' asks for your help to "Save the Internet, Support Net Neutrality" - H.R. 5353

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:29 PM
Original message
'True Majority' asks for your help to "Save the Internet, Support Net Neutrality" - H.R. 5353
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 02:50 PM by Breeze54


"Save the Internet, Support Net Neutrality"



http://www.truemajority.org/index.php

From : "Ilya Sheyman, TrueMajority" <alerts@truemajority.org>

Subject : Save the Internet, Support Net Neutrality

Date : Wed, Jun 11, 2008 10:09 AM

Dear Breeze54;

We should all be alarmed by the recent instances of telecom companies attempting to censor content on their networks that they don't agree with. After all, does the postal service have the right to slow down or stop your letters if they don't agree with what you write?

Network neutrality means that users -- not carriers -- should be in control of what content they view and what services they use on the internet. Fortunately, a bipartisan bill has just been introduced into Congress that will codify net neutrality into law and prevent discriminatory favoritism based on content.

Our friends at Credo Action are running a campaign in support of net neutrality and they need our help.

Can you take a minute to help them by sending a message to your Representative?

Click here to support H.R. 5353, the Internet Freedom Preservation Act.

http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/net_neutrality/?rc=tm20608

Big phone and cable companies like AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner have worked very hard to oppose Net Neutrality and pave the way for "network management" practices that allow blocking of certain content in favor of Web sites and services the companies prefer.

H.R. 5353, from Representatives Markey (D-MA) and Pickering (R-MS), requires the FCC to actively protect the free-flowing internet from gatekeepers, enforcing protections that guard against unreasonable discriminatory favoritism for, or degradation of, content by network operators on the internet. The new bill also calls on the FCC to convene at least eight "broadband summits" across the country; taking the issue outside the Beltway -- and beyond the corrosive influence of telecom lobbyists -- is a very good idea.

PLEASE Tell your representative to co-sponsor and support H.R. 5353 to save net neutrality.
http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/net_neutrality/?rc=tm20608

The Letter Reads as follows:


Sign the petition

Full Petition Text:


I support the broad concept of net neutrality and specifically the Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2008 from Representatives Markey and Pickering. Powerful phone and cable companies should NOT be allowed to block, degrade, censor or discriminate against content with which they do not agree.

Millions upon millions of Americans rely upon an open Internet in their daily lives. Our elected leaders must protect our basic right to communicate. After all, what good is free speech if powerful corporations have the ability to shut off or slow down viewpoints they find objectionable?
Sign the petition and sign up to receive periodic updates on activism opportunities and offers.

Email: *
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Street Address: *
City: *
State: *
ZIP: *

Add your voice to Credo Action's campaign to stop powerful corporations
from shutting off or slowing down viewpoints they find objectionable.

Tell Your Representative: Save Net Neutrality!





Thank you for working to build a better world


-Ilya

Ilya Sheyman
Online Organizer

PS. Have some fun after you sign the letter here: http://www.truemajority.org/fun/



Signed... Will you join me, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kiteinthewind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks! You know? I thought this had been decided but the telecoms
apparently have not stopped and I heard the last bit of a newsflash on TV the other day and it was talking about all the telecoms and a "New Rule" but I didn't hear the whole thing and now I'm wondering if this is what they were talking about. I haven't heard anything since then, until I got this e-mail today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. This is one of those things they will NEVER stop trying..
The current freedom & "two-way communication" nature of the Internet is an anathema to control of message. . .It makes "The Big Lie" obsolete and unmanageable. Those who would build empires will never tolerate this medium as it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. No one else is concerned about the telecoms censoring their internet & TV services?
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 02:54 PM by Breeze54
:shrug:

Hmmmmmm..... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah!!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Done. Thx. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're welcome, IndyOp!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. The model offering to have sex with virgins who support net nutrality has a more intriguing case
http://dontstayvirgin.movielol.org/

She insists that it is not a hoax though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Wtf? Never heard of it! - Did you sign?
Thanks for the link, I think? Not sure if I want to check it out though.....

Hope you sign the letter and tell all your friends too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kicking for the evening crowd!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. NN is a foot in the door of eventual censorship
You don't want to set up a precendent. Internet must remain free for innovation and distribution of ideas.

Robert Pepper -- Robert Pepper is senior managing director, global advanced technology policy, at Cisco Systems, and is the former FCC chief of policy development. He says: "The supporters of net neutrality regulation believe that more rules are necessary. In their view, without greater regulation, service providers might parcel out bandwidth or services, creating a bifurcated world in which the wealthy enjoy first-class Internet access, while everyone else is left with slow connections and degraded content. <60>

Bob Kahn -- Bob Kahn, one of the fathers of the Internet, has said net neutrality is a slogan that would freeze innovation in the core of the Internet.<8>

Dave Farber, Michael Katz, Chris Yoo, and Gerald Faulhaber -- Farber, known as the 'grandfather of the Internet' because he taught many of its chief designers, has written and spoken strongly in favor of continued research and development on core Internet protocols. He joined academic colleagues Michael Katz, Chris Yoo, and Gerald Faulhaber in an Op-Ed for the Washington Post strongly critical of network neutrality, stating, "The Internet needs a makeover. Unfortunately, congressional initiatives aimed at preserving the best of the old Internet threaten to stifle the emergence of the new one."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. So, where do you stand? I'm against censorship and I'm paying for the service to access the web.
I agree that these huge companies will cater to the rich. Only stands to reason
in this corporate run world (What else would they do?) but I'll fight them on it.

No censorship! :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SergeyDovlatov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I am for keeping the internet regulation free as much as possible
NN is a beginning of government involvment in how internet operates. I am afraid that regulation will dampen the innovations in the internet infrastructure and opens the door for more government regulation, which will include more spying, more censorship, etc.

I am putting big hopes that things like youtube, bloggers, research archives will counterbalance the official media and government lying.

I am afraid that the establishment feels threatened by the internet and wants to crack down on it. NN is just the first step. I know that a lot of people are well intentioned supporters of NN, but, I am afraid, they are being used by those who want to make sure that internet becomes as benign as mainstream media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks for clarifying and I don't feel used at all.... 3 million people fought the FCC in '03 and
Edited on Wed Jun-11-08 07:09 PM by Breeze54
and WON!!! ;) I think they are still on our side on this. ;)

I appreciate your expanding on your previous reply. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. k&r'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC