Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The current "gas crisis" is manipulated....We are being "Enron-ed" by the oil co.'s

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:50 PM
Original message
The current "gas crisis" is manipulated....We are being "Enron-ed" by the oil co.'s
http://seekingalpha.com/article/80010-greenberger-s-testimony-i-banks-control-the-energy-market

Michael Greenberger, the former head of the CFTC's Division of Trading and Markets, testified yesterday before the Senate Commerce Committee on the topic of Energy Market Manipulation.

He stated that former Senator Phil Gramm of Texas sneaked the Enron loophole through a large piece of insignificant legislation years ago: the result was that regulations upon the futures industry were abandoned.

Greenberger said that legislation immediately closing the Enron Loophole with a broader, international scope would stop market manipultion and would cause oil prices to plunge over 25% overnight.

As early as the winter of 2002, it was widely known that the 2000 Commodities Futures Modernization Act had created a monster, capable of running up energy prices outside of the normal law of supply and demand.

Worse, our government had been warned this was going to happen. Representatives of the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the CFTC had already told Congress not to deregulate energy because "the market was ripe for manipulation."

Professor Greenberger warned about our "New American Economy" far better than I could:

"Should we have an economy that’s based on whether people make good or bad bets? Or should we have an economy where people build companies, create manufacturing, do inventions, advance the American society and make it more productive? We are rewarding people for sitting at their computers and punching in bets. That’s not the way our economy is going to be built, and India and China, with their focus on science and industry and building real businesses, are going to eat our lunch, unless the American public wakes up and puts an end to an economy that praises and makes heroes out of speculators."

Greenberger’s statement explains why Detroit and other American manufacturers suffer while Wall Street speculators make a fortune — and your rapidly shrinking checkbook pays for it, every time you buy food, fuel or feed.

All because there is no shortage of these goods, you’re just being told there is because it’s more profitable – for a few – that way.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it is. Two Texas oil men in the WH, secret energy meetings, war on ME oil nations
Gas was around $1:50 when * took office.

A two year old could figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Seriously! What did we expect?
And thank you, Phil-fucking Graham! Every breath the man takes is a waste of good oxygen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh huh. Nationalize.
Energy is too important to national security to be in private greedy hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. 91% of the world's oil is already nationalized. It's made it worse.
Because politicians can't seem to figure out that they need to invest in exploration and development. Without those investments the world's nationalized oil companies are depleting rapidly.

I know some people have nationalization as their inflexible cure-all dogma, but dogmatic rigidity will NOT solve this problem.

I can't think of anything worse than putting politicians in charge of our national energy supply.

What is needed is both capitalism, AND government oversight and regulation. Nationalized oil hasn't worked out anywhere it's been tried. Dogma aside, reality is what it is. (Something we all seem to readily agree on when the dogma is something equally absurd like "abstinence only" sex education.)

Black and white dogma does not solve real-world problems. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's not working in Venezuela?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. " Venezuela increases petroleum imports despite vast deposits at home"
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/30/business/LA-FIN-Venezuela-Petroleum.php">Venezuela increases petroleum imports despite vast deposits at home

CARACAS, Venezuela: Venezuela's state petroleum company, PDVSA, increased petroleum imports by nearly 150 percent between the first quarter of 2007 and the same period this year, bank statistics show.

A report by the Venezuelan Central Bank this week demonstrated that petroleum imports reached US$1.5 billion (€964 million) during the first quarter of 2008. The imports — which include diesel oil, gasoline and chemical additives for gasoline products — are the country's highest in more than a decade.

A spokesperson for PDVSA said the company had no immediate comment on the issue.

Economist Gustavo Garcia, a professor at a Caracas business school, said called the increase "one more factor that shows how production has fallen," forcing the company to purchase petroleum products outside of the country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Isn't this the same strategy the US partakes in?
They have "vast deposits" but importation has increased. What was their usage before their imports increased 150%?

Doesn't the US import most of it's oil while stockpiling it's own reserves?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. US "vast reserves"? You are kdding, right?
U.S. production peaked way back in the 1970's.

We have no "vast reserves".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Those are your words.
I didn't say we the US had "vast reserves".

Try arguing the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
32. I willing to take a chance.
I can't think of anything worse than putting politicians in charge of our national energy supply.

No, so let's put greedy capitalists who buy governments in charge of our national energy supply. Energy is too important to be left in the hands of a few profiteers.

This "government can't solve the problem" meme is getting tiresome...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Enron Loophole is about to be shut down if Bush does NOT veto this legislation:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. These two belong on Wanted posters on the post office walls


Phil and Wendy ..... America's fun couple ....... progenitors of the "Enron Exemption."





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've got 'old American Oil (Indiana) stock'.......
Standard OIl Company, that became "Amoco"...American Oil Company.....which then was purchased by British Petroleum (BP)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's not only that. Earlier today I posted links to memos from the
oil compant files stating that they weren't making the profit they wanted because they had too many refineries. They CLOSED 200 of them! They stated that their profits would be so much better if demand was greater than supply! I also sited that they have 10,000 offshore drilling permits, but have only drilled 4,000 of them. They also have permits for 25 exploratory wells that have never been used!

This whole thing is total BS!

The person I quoted was Rep. DeFazio. I got the info confirmed through Google on the memos and the permits & wells dever used!

How can we get our Dems in Congress to push this info? I'm trying but I'm just one voice in the wilderness of DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush Sr. had his Oil Buddies do it to President Carter.
Once Reagan & Bush was safely in the White House. The oil companies miraculously found several hundres million barrles of oil they had lost in their own holds. Reagan and Bush had a big laugh and the gas crisis was over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. REUTERS: OPEC boss slams speculators
With oil prices rallying OPEC again insists tight supply is not an issue.

Speaking exclusively to Reuters, the oil cartel's Secretary General Abdullah al-Badri has instead blamed the oil bubble on rampant unchecked speculation.

Darcy Lambton reports

http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=84361&videoChannel=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. OPEC Chief says -- there is no shortage of oil --
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/11/watch-opec-chief-there-is_n_106438.html

It's the greedy scumbags on Wall Street raping us with their manipulation of the market just as Enron did.....

Create hyper-demand by shutting down refineries and then claim to be operating at max capacity to manipulate prices upward.

There is a word for this.

Robbery. Blackmail. Stealing. etc., etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. And of course we trust a trader to know all about geology. NOT.
Ever notice that to a carpenter every problem needs hammer and nails to get fixed.
To a doctor, every problem needs a prescription drug to get fixed.
To an account, every problem is just a matter of correcting the accounting errors.
To a Wall Street speculator, every problem looks like speculation run amok.

Maybe we should ask the geologists about what is, essentially, a geological problem.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3433228

There IS a growing shortage of oil. There are getting to be fewer and fewer fools who deny that fact every day. Economists will be the last wake to reality because they live in a make-believe world where demand ALWAYS creates supply by some magical "hand of the market".

I'm shocked that anybody would believe a word any economist has to say, given their abysmal track record. Yet, when they play the right Pollyanna tune, everybody loves to sing along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Oil extraction is a problem
But I don't think it's as big a factor in driving prices higher than the unregulated speculation.

Are we at Peak Oil? On the downhill side?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Of course it's manipulated
...welcome to capitalism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Michael Greenberger was on Washington Journal
a week or 2 back.
He discussed this. He suggested that if justice dept launched an investigation into energy commodities trading, gas prices would come down Immediately.

Also, It isnt just guys LIKE Enron, that are hiking gas prices, It is in fact some of the very same individuals....2nd tier Enron ex-employees. The same assholes that were laughing about "turning off Grandma's electricity".


PS. De Fazio for President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
33. I'd be surprised if an investigation happens before the election.
It seems like congress turns to jelly at election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Right . . . just like the 70's .... shortage crap . . .
And there's good ole Phil Gramm again !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-11-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. They were supposed to be opening the oil reserves ...what happened to that???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
21. Well they got caught selling death futures and decided to just
tell us what we should and should not buy, directly. Just like who we should vote for and the M$M's biased conjecture on what we should believe. If you don't, you're a terrorist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
22. Pardon me while I die of not surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
23. Today they announce that gas will level off at $4.15 in Mid August, how the fuck can
they merely declare this to happen? Americans are being had by government and big oil, plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yep it's another Enron all right and Congress & * Co is looking the other way.
:grr:

:argh:

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hickory Fan Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
26. Video of Greenberger Testimony ------ Must See
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. This is criminal.
This is "legal" theft.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #26
34. When was that testimony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Hickory Fan Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. Approximately one week ago with link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
29. Funny
I was saying much along these lines about the food prices crisis - that people buying food commodities should be forced to show proof of a distribution network ... I had no idea legislation like this existed for gas or that there was a loophole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. Pump and dump.
You raise the prices of gas a lot, then lower it a little and people get relieved. You then raise them again a lot, and then lower it a little and people get relieve. Repeat over a few years and you rake in quite a nice sum of money.

Case in point: If you ask people now if they would like to be paying $3.00 a gallon instead of $4.00 like they are now, most of them would jump at the chance. But a year ago, $3.00 a gallon was rididulous amount to pay and people wouldn't have wanted to pay that at all. The oil and gas companies have just subscribed to the theory if they make people think they are paying less for an amount they were going to charge all along, they will be happy.

So the question is begged: When gas goes to $5.00 a gallon, will we be happy to pay $4.00 a gallon for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. Where's Congress? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. I don't know but their hands are in the cookie jar.
And they're pulling up money, not cookies.

Until we reform elections, lawmakers will be owned by the big sources of reelection funds:

Media and energy.

So, it's no surprise that the media and the energy companies are the real kings of the world now.

If we publicly funded elections and limited their spending, good candidates who care and believe in the constitution would rise to power and represent us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pathwhisperer Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
36. A successive speculative bubbles economy is a psychopath's wetdream
"the only true kind of economy is a value-added economy. If a company asked to be chartered (incorporated) so it could run a business with a printing press and print more dollars, it would not be allowed. Such a business would add nothing to an economy. Well, how about speculative bubbles and runaway speculators? What’s the difference? There is no such thing as a bubble economy, kept afloat by inflating one bubble after another. Sociopaths cannot understand this, adult cause and effect are beyond them. Their analysis stops at ‘money in my pocket, good,’ ‘money not in my pocket, bad.’ To this day, sociopaths continue inventing perpetual motion machines — cause and effect are truly beyond them. A speculative economy is the economic equivalent." http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/proposal-to-ubs-upper-management/

It's worth noting that UBS hired Phil Gramm after he left government (they were very proud of that when I was there) and also bought the Enron trading arm (paid for by future profits, which by the magic of accounting may turn out to be for free).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
37. absolutely
but it is getting some moronamericans to ditch their SUVs and buy hybrids
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. Don't rock the boat, baby!
The media is so conditioned to shrug off the rise in gas prices generally as meaningless rage and stoic inevitability with fudged blather from the oil industry that this beauty just blows right by.

Think of Americans being told that in place of the housing bubble they are being dinned by speculators and big oil for both food and gas to float the stock market. Even if they are invested in the market(at no gain if the bubble is coming directly- this time- and measurably visible out of their pockets daily and through slavish necessity- even then they are effectively flat taxed with no upper limit regulation or mercy by private companies.

A nickel? A quarter? A dollar per gallon and a percent of all food prices...what would it take for the mobs to really have an object to focus their emotions on?

Instead we are providing a lawless example of complete impunity where the funds are directly and uncontrollably pulling money away from Americans for the speculation game of the big guys. We are, by not tearing down Wall Street and the corporate offices of the pirates setting a precedent unprotected by any law, unreported by any large news source.

A precedent to kill us for profit and we will never think to know, to protest, to strike back at this ultimate daring.

They murder people every single day for profit. It is often faraway places where those peoples rioting for food don't bother us much. It is often indirectly with some choice or seeming benefit involved to make the surgery painless. It is more often simply invisible or not spoken about at all. This time however this is literal highway robbery on all consumers for all necessities of work or survival, profiteering on impotence, habitually kicking the guy who hasn't fought back and isn't sure where it is all coming from.

If it was hammered home by the stupid press who themselves are inevitably robbed daily, they, their families, their nation, their human race in general, it would stop very quickly. Instead, it gets worse. Maybe they know the limits of public endurance or their greed will be too strong- like Enron's.
What the hell can the public know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
41. By the energy companies or hedge funds and investment firms?
I heard today that Morgan Stanley is the biggest holder of oil futures, at present, and I figure it very likely that some investment and banking firms are looking for a way to make-up their mortgage losses. Until the commodities bubble bursts, and we have a complete meltdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC