Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Happy Habeas Day-A Big Shot Right In The Guts Of Whole Unitary-Executive Bull-Crap!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:38 PM
Original message
Happy Habeas Day-A Big Shot Right In The Guts Of Whole Unitary-Executive Bull-Crap!
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 12:40 PM by kpete
To hold that the political branches may switch the Constitution on or off at will would lead to a regime in which they, not his Court, say “what the law is.”
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/06/12/happy-habeas-day/#more-2282

This case is far more important in a separation of powers sense - to my eyes the habeas and MCA/DTA issues were a clear slam-dunk from the get-go. The only question was whether there would be 5 votes to see it my way.

But, the references to Marbury and the courts stating what the law is, rather than the executive and legislative, are a big shot right in the guts of the whole Unitary Executive/judicial modesty bullcrap which the wingnuts have been peddling and working in since 2001.

Every signing statement - in which Bushie determined some laws were or were not constitutional, or in which he asserted his Article II powers allowed him to not enforce, ignore or rewrite - void.

Every Yoo memo, the ones Whitehouse has spoken about, in which the President was the sole judge of the scope of his Article II powers, and his decision was unreviewable, etc. Gone.

All the modesty which required deference to the political branches - gone.

The Court has, it seems, found it indeed has a set. And that it intends to use them.

#4
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2008/06/12/the-rule-of-law-prevailed/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now it's time for Congress to find their set...and use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. The vote (FIVE TO FOUR) is still a warning sign
We need a D in the WH ASAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Absolutely!! I can't wait to undo the past 7 1/2 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's a good quote
To hold that the political branches may switch the Constitution on or off at will would lead to a regime in which they, not his Court, say “what the law is.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eallen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hoorah! Hooray! But Bosshog is right. We have to get Obama elected...
So that the conservatives on the court do not become its voice.

:hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. THANK GOD.
It's about time.

The light at the end of the tunnel was not a train after all.

This is good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Three Cheers for Anthony Kennedy!
And a thousand razzberries to Tony Scalia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rude Pundit has a good overview of Scalia's batshit dissent
In brief, starts out as a Guilliani stump speech (terror! 9/11!), accuses the court of having no business doign their jobs and then wanders off into random blathering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm very pleased to see that the majority opinion points out something I've said from Day 1 about
Gitmo: that the fact that the U.S. has control over Gitmo puts it under American law.

The deciding issues for Gitmo are that the US has control over the territory of the Gitmo base, as well as complete control of the detainees (...) The CCR attorneys on the call did say that the ruling prevented the government from creating "law-free zones" in which they rule, but without the rule of law.


:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. After a few days of extreme disappointment over the failure to extend
unemployment benefits and the denial of windfall profits taxes on the oil companies, this decision is downright wonderful, albeit unbelievable! Thank you, thank you to the liberal judges! And, thanks to kpete for the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeeHopeWin Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. It IS a happy day!
Thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC