closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:30 PM
Original message |
There's an article on Yahoo that the GOP is going to smear Michelle; so does that mean its okay to |
|
smear Cindy, in return? What will be Obama's response to such attacks?
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. How do you smear someone that stole drugs from a charity |
|
to feed her illegal habit?
Seems it would be pretty hard to smear someone like that.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Snort! And shops while on house arrest. |
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Well hasn't her husband John already trashed her? |
|
Did he not call her the "c" word?
|
seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
dubeskin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't think Obama will stoop so low |
|
as to smear Cindy. I think if there are any attacks against her, it will be coming from Obama's supporters.
And I think Obama will get extremely aggressive in defending his wife. Any person would defend their spouse against such attacks.
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the attacks but will defend his wife.
I, on the other hand, have no problem forwarding on some choice words about Cindy to anyone who emails me trash about Michelle. I won't initiate it, but I will repsond to it. No problem with that at all.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
7. That Cindy is a c _ _t! McSame said so himself. |
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. McCain will not be the GOP nominee, he will be discredited before the RNC begins |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I'd be inclined to agree with you if the RNC convention weren't so |
|
late in the year. If they pick another candidate in September, that candidate would only have less than 2 months to campaign. I don't see that happening!
|
whistle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. That's all they need to dupe the country and steal the election yet again |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I don't think so. If you look at the possible alt. candidates, you're |
|
talking about Huck, Mittens, and Paul. Paul is a radical, Huck has primarily ONE constituency, and Mittens has all those people who think he wears weird underware and is a nut! Who the heck could they pick that late in the year who would even stand a chance?
I don't think McNut is going anywhere. I think the Pubs are sacrificing him because they know they can't win this year, and they will throw everything they can find at Obama in his first 4 years to make sure they get power back in 2012!
|
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Which can only mean one thing . . . |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. You got it! Isn't it GREAT!!!! n/t |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-12-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
14. We don't need anyone's permission to attack republicans. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |