Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Tried to Destroy Medicare

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 07:31 PM
Original message
Bush Tried to Destroy Medicare
Who even remembered that Bush lied to the public and the Congress (by the way, that's a felony) during his effort to destroy Medicare? Well, Congressman Dennis Kucinich remembered. He made that act into Article Number 30 of his 35 articles of impeachment. But there's no reason he couldn't have pulled out a dozen other similar incidents or even patterns of incidents. There is every reason to take him seriously when he threatens to come back in a month with 60 articles of impeachment, if by that time the House Judiciary Committee has not acted on the first batch. And perhaps at that point, Congressman Kucinich will force a vote on the floor on the question of impeachment. Perhaps, as he has already hinted, he won't go it alone but share the podium with colleagues. Or perhaps the threat of unrelenting pressure will restore the impeachment power to our Constitution in less than 30 days. Already there are Democrats sounding more positive on impeachment than they ever have before, and Republicans saying they'd vote for it if it was put to a vote.

Crimes that we yawn at because they're committed by Bush would stand out as horrors during someone else's presidency. This one is no exception:

ARTICLE XXX
MISLEADING CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DESTROY MEDICARE

In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed", has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, together with the Vice President, pursued policies which deliberately drained the fiscal resources of Medicare by forcing it to compete with subsidized private insurance plans which are allowed to arbitrarily select or not select those they will cover; failing to provide reasonable levels of reimbursements to Medicare providers, thereby discouraging providers from participating in the program, and designing a Medicare Part D benefit without cost controls which allowed pharmaceutical companies to gouge the American taxpayers for the price of prescription drugs.

The President created, manipulated, and disseminated information given to the citizens and Congress of the United States in support of his prescription drug plan for Medicare that enriched drug companies while failing to save beneficiaries sufficient money on their prescription drugs. He misled Congress and the American people into thinking the cost of the benefit was $400 billion. It was widely understood that if the cost exceeded that amount, the bill would not pass due to concerns about fiscal irresponsibility.

A Medicare Actuary who possessed information regarding the true cost of the plan, $539 billion, was instructed by the Medicare Administrator to deny Congressional requests for it. The Actuary was threatened with sanctions if the information was disclosed to Congress, which, unaware of the information, approved the bill. Despite the fact that official cost estimates far exceeded $400 billion, President Bush offered assurances to Congress that the cost was $400 billion, when his office had information to the contrary. In the House of Representatives, the bill passed by a single vote and the Conference Report passed by only 5 votes. The White House knew the actual cost of the drug benefit was high enough to prevent its passage. Yet the White House concealed the truth and impeded an investigation into its culpability.

In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.

You can say that again.

And again.

And again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to be particularly vigilant between November and January.



At that point he will know he has absolutely nothing to lose, so expect him to try anything.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I dunno. He's been so odd lately. Almost begging for love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. rule of law is soooo
pre-9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait 'til the AARP gets a hold of this Article of Impeachment.
Older retired Americans vote in very large numbers.

If these people get together to push this point, Congresspeople will pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Bush family has been bilking Medicare for a long time. It's one of their hobbies.
Bookmark this article but for the Jeb material, find "recarey" on this page.

Bush Family Values (MotherJones,1992)

In 1991, President Bush bristled at a flurry of news accounts that questioned the business ethics of three of his sons. "The media ought to be ashamed of itself for what they're doing," Bush complained. "They have a right to make a living, and their relationships are appropriate," added a White House spokeswoman in June 1992.

Since George Bush has raised "family values" as a campaign issue repeatedly, though, it seems only fair to take a look at his own family. A computer search showed that over the past five years stories have periodically surfaced chronicling the individual business antics of the president's sons -- each riding comfortably through life in the slipstream of his father's growing power and influence.

Although a handful of good reporters for the New York Times, LA Times, Village Voice, and Wall Street Journal have diligently been digging through business records for months, something has been missing: an overview that "connects the dots" in the myriad deals that have been examined, making it clear that cashing in on influence has become a pattern of behavior extending through the first family.

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1992/09/bushboys.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. And it continues
Neil Bush is also the owner of a company that supplies all the schools in the country with the software for the 'No child left behind' debacle. Go figure!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. You know this is one of the reasons I want to throw the book at them.
Edited on Thu Jun-12-08 08:44 PM by Cleita
My wet dream is not that they go to prison but that they are stripped of their fortunes, left penniless to fend for themselves, where they have to depend on Social Security and Medicare and all those programs they tried to destroy to survive. Now that would be poetic justice to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-12-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think the US Treasury would be justified ...



in seeking a judgment to have BushCo forfeit all their ill-gotten gains back to the American people who they lied, deceived and cheated out of a small fortune.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer93 Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Justice
Bush would never end up on the street - he'd just blackmail his family into taking him in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks, I was looking for this info today.
Popped into my head last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kuchinich is a hero of the noblest sort.
Wish there were more with the heart,courage,honesty and wisdom like him in power.There would be no tolerance for the shit we have put up with in the government and those recycled trash thugs in power now who are but the sick rancid leftovers from the neocon that should have died with him raygun era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asp64064 Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Missouri Governor Matt Blunt Tried But Failed to Destroy Medicaid in Missouri!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC