Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lindsey Graham wants to amend the Constitution, get rid of that annoying habeas corpus thing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:36 AM
Original message
Lindsey Graham wants to amend the Constitution, get rid of that annoying habeas corpus thing
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 01:36 AM by Fighting Irish
Yes, the same Lindsey Graham who's ass John McLame is endlessly kissing. And Graham wants to wipe his ass with the Magna Carta.

In response to today's landmark Supreme Court decision granting habeas corpus to Guantanamo detainees, Lindsey Graham has decided he wants to amend the United State Constitution to strip it of any pesky kinds of civil rights protections that have existed since the Magna Carta.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) vowed Thursday to do everything in his power to overturn the Supreme Court’s decision on Guantanamo Bay detainees, saying that "if necessary," he would push for a constitutional amendment to modify the decision.

Graham blasted the decision as "irresponsible and outrageous," echoing the sentiments of many congressional Republicans and President Bush.

That will be a hard amendment to get past the Judiciary Committee, chaired by Patrick Leahy...


(more)

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/6/12/17277/3723/62/534898

Yep, those are your Republicans, the party of small government who live to conquer other countries to spread 'freedom.' That same 'freedom' they're trying to deprive us of.

If this doesn't motivate you to support Obama, then you either have no brain or no soul.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good Luck on that Graham you guys are cooked
Republican party is going to be GONE its imploding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. People like Graham are the reason "and domestic" is in the phrase "enemies foreign and domestic".
He and his ilk are a greater threat to this Nation
than Usama binLaden and his followers are or could
ever be. He is an ENEMY of the USA, and that's just
a simple fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hard to believe but this Asshole was an Attorney.
Oh yeah, he worked for the US Military. :mad:

Didn't he get worked up over the Torture at Abu Grahib back when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not only worked for the military... he was a JAG PROSECUTOR


If he was still in service he would be working
to convict the Haditha marines.

Methinks he's a bit of a cynic and an opportunist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. Bingo
The funny part is these are the goons who claim to dislike 'activist' judges. Time for some treason trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. DAMN FASCISTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. DAMN FASCISTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Warner, McCain, and Graham drafted the MCA in the first place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Now, that's really a fascist stance.
I hesitate to use that label with regard to a specific person, but really. The Right to the Writ of Habeas Corpus is the underpinning of our democracy. We have nothing without it.

He should know better. He needs a few years under a Democratic president and majority in Congress. That will remind him how precious his rights are.

His temper tantrum will pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. He needs a few years back under the rock
he originally crawled from.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Asshole!
Fuck him and the horse he rode in on. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. King Edward 1305....its been that long we been protecting rights of the people...WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FraDon Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. King John, it was; in 1215.
From Wikipedia:
Magna Carta (Latin for Great Charter, literally "Great Paper"), also called Magna Carta Libertatum (Great Charter of Freedoms), is an English charter originally issued in 1215. It required the King to renounce certain rights, respect certain legal procedures and accept that his will could be bound by the law. It explicitly protected certain rights of the King's subjects, whether free or fettered — most notably the writ of habeas corpus, allowing appeal against unlawful imprisonment.

Magna Carta was the most significant early influence on the extensive historical process that led to the rule of constitutional law today. Magna Carta influenced the development of the common law and many constitutional documents, such as the United States Constitution. Many clauses were renewed throughout the Middle Ages, and continued to be renewed as late as the 18th century. By the second half of the 19th century, however, most clauses in their original form had been repealed from English law.

Magna Carta was the first document forced onto an English King by his subjects in an attempt to limit his powers by law. It was preceded by the 1100 Charter of Liberties in which King Henry I voluntarily stated that his own powers were under the law.

In practice Magna Carta mostly did not limit the power of the King in the Middle Ages; by the time of the English Civil War, however, it had become an important symbol for those who wished to show that the King was bound by the law.

Magna Carta is normally understood to refer to a single document, that of 1215. Various amended versions of the Magna Carta appeared in subsequent years however, and it is the 1332 version which remains on the statute books of England and Wales.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. whoa, good one....thanx....
I had read it was 1305 when it first came into play...also from wiki...but I digress....whats a 100 years? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, is that this year's gay marriage/flag burning amendment?
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 04:01 AM by aquart
The one thing the Republicans offer to prove they've actually done some work?

on edit: because they know there is no way in hell it will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. What's next? Suspending elections? You know that's what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why don't we just get rid of Lindsey Graham
That would be much easier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. He just won in the primary here. Unfortunately but not surprising.

Need I add, in November I'll vote for the Democratic candidate no matter who it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. I mean, we're STILL trying to get the ERA passed...
What makes him think there is enough support for the GIVING AWAY of rights that we would actually amend our Constitution? It's not like ramrodding another bad law through Congress to appease the executive branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Building a bridge to the 9th century
"Damn the torpedoes, Full Speed Astern!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. No doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Maybe the people in SC can get rid of the annoying Sen. Graham..?
in November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
22. Good. He looks pathetic trying to "tow the Republican line" while ignoring why this country is great
I think it's great - he makes the Republicans continue to look like the folks who are changing our way of life based on the acts of a band of thugs - what a cowardly wimp who has no respect for the word "freedom".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
23. Good Luck with that Lindsey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
24. If adults were running our government, the issue never would have arisen.
Lindsey Graham is the poster child for the spoiled, rotten to the core Republicons - they don't get their way, so they try to change the rules. Why they would choose this whiny little bitch to front for them on the SC decision is beyond me, but there you have it.

With the election in November, we have an opportunity to make the (R)s irrelevant. If we blow this one, we will regret it.

Clean elections and the full restoration of the Constitution should be our two biggest concerns right now. The Republicans want neither and Shakespeare's "...thou dost protest too much" doesn't begin to convey my feeling of how afraid they are of losing control of Washington.

All the rest is noise as long as we are able to restore the vote and the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. we've have tried govt by pissypants -- time for America to move on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
27. His remarks gives credence of the notion that ridding the Nation of the GOP is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
28. I suppose if Mr. Graham gave it try...
Well, I suppose if Mr. Graham gave it try, we could easily turn the right-wing screed of "legislating from the bench" completely around and ourselves begin to trumpet, "judiciating from the legislature"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. I always get the urge to puke when Graham takes the stage
The shit he tries to make sound reasonable is always amazing- much like Falwell's comments about how God made 9/11 happen because he hates gays and feminists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. When are we getting rid o Graham ...??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good luck getting that ratified you grovelling little twerp...
..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC