Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scared Of Liberals? Well, The Pledge of Allegiance Was Written By A SOCIALIST!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:51 PM
Original message
Scared Of Liberals? Well, The Pledge of Allegiance Was Written By A SOCIALIST!
The Socialist Pledge of Allegiance
In a 2002 article in The Nation magazine, "Patriotism's Secret History,"
Peter Dreier and Dick Flats gave the basic outline of the story behind the Pledge of Allegiance:


The Pledge of Allegiance was written in 1892 by a leading Christian socialist, Francis Bellamy, who was fired from his Boston ministry for his sermons depicting Jesus as a socialist. Bellamy penned the Pledge of Allegiance for Youth's Companion, a magazine for young people published in Boston with a circulation of about 500,000.

A few years earlier, the magazine had sponsored a largely successful campaign to sell American flags to public schools. In 1891 the magazine hired Bellamy--whose first cousin Edward Bellamy was the famous socialist author of the utopian novel Looking Backward--to organize a public relations campaign to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus's discovery of America by promoting use of the flag in public schools. Bellamy gained the support of the National Education Association, along with President Benjamin Harrison and Congress, for a national ritual observance in the schools, and he wrote the Pledge of Allegiance as part of the program's flag salute ceremony.

Bellamy thought such an event would be a powerful expression on behalf of free public education. Moreover, he wanted all the schoolchildren of America to recite the pledge at the same moment. He hoped the pledge would promote a moral vision to counter the individualism embodied in capitalism and expressed in the climate of the Gilded Age, with its robber barons and exploitation of workers. Bellamy intended the line "One nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all" to express a more collective and egalitarian vision of America.

Bellamy's view that unbridled capitalism, materialism and individualism betrayed America's promise was widely shared in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Many American radicals and progressive reformers proudly asserted their patriotism. To them, America stood for basic democratic values--economic and social equality, mass participation in politics, free speech and civil liberties, elimination of the second-class citizenship of women and racial minorities, a welcome mat for the world's oppressed people. The reality of corporate power, right-wing xenophobia and social injustice only fueled progressives' allegiance to these principles and the struggle to achieve them.


There's more to the story, however. For example, the Wikipedia entry for the Pledge states:

The pledge was supposed to be quick and to the point. Bellamy designed it to be stated in 15 seconds. He had initially also considered using the words equality and fraternity but decided they were too controversial since many people opposed equal rights for women and blacks.


The first major change came 30 years later:

In 1923 the National Flag Conference called for the words my Flag to be changed to the Flag of the United States. The reason given was to ensure that immigrants knew to which flag reference was being made. The words "of America" were added a year later. The U.S. Congress officially recognized the Pledge as the official national pledge on June 22, 1942.

And the words "under God" were not added until the Cold War era, primarily as the result of a campaign by the Knights of Columbus.

more at:
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=D4DE658296F66F58B5928C9A8BF2A4CC?diaryId=6358
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. No!!!
Why do you hate Amurica!???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, why in the hell do you hate America !
Everybody knows that a Socialist did not write our Pledge of Allegiance. It was written by one of the Disciples of Christ. It's in the Bible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. And it stresses the indivisibility of the United States.
Hmmmm. 1892, just 27 years after Lee surrendered at Appomattox Courthouse. I wonder at which part of the country that pointed little reminder was aimed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goat or Panic Donating Member (509 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Also from wikipedia:
An early version of the salute, adopted in 1892, was known as the Bellamy salute. It also ended with the arm outstretched and the palm upwards, but began with the right hand outstretched, palm facing downward. However, during World War II the outstretched arm became identified with Nazism and Fascism, and the custom was changed: today the Pledge is said from beginning to end with the right hand over the heart.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There's more to it than that...

Bellamy was a military socialist who believed that school children should be indoctrinated into serving the military at an early age. The German National Socialists borrowed much from these concepts, including that salute. I would argue that this form of "socialism" has much more in common with right-wing pro-fascist ideals, as we learned from the way Germany evolved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Time to rewrite the Pledge - Take out "Under God" add
Equality and fraternity.

"I pledge allegiance to the flag and to the republic for which it stands. One nation indivisible, with liberty, justice, equality and fraternity for all."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I like that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. or perhaps "sorority" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I like frorority
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Bad formation. It'd have to be frarority or frorarity :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Use the French spelling - Fraternité
There is really no need to change or pc-ize a perfectly good word with a precise meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's to its "precise meaning" that I object. Putting it into French doesn't take the curse off. (nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoneOffShore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. You object to "A group of people sharing a common profession or interests"?
First definition that comes up on my dictionary program.

Okay.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't find that def at all.
Larousse: Brotherhood; fraternity

MW (which includes le français du Canada): Fraternity, brotherhood

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PermanentRevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, NOES!!!
What has we done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC