Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Might be too soon to ask this...But is this "St. Russert Stuff" to Immunize his Memory from....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:17 PM
Original message
Might be too soon to ask this...But is this "St. Russert Stuff" to Immunize his Memory from....
Edited on Sat Jun-14-08 05:37 PM by KoKo01
What might be coming out about "Complicity?"

The MSNBC Coverage has seemed excessive...but then MSNBC is a Cable so General Electric can do what it wants with it's coverage (and Jack Welch and Tim Russert both have homes on Nantucket) and GE made Russert on NBC (it's network affiliate) and so it's a "Family Business."

In fact since Friday the 13th afternoon when reports of Russert's untimely death hit the airwaves and internet it seems that MSNBC has been a "family" where everyone whose life Russert, his Dad and Luke (who managed ..as a Boston College Undergrduate...to get a show with James Carville on Sports promoted by his Dad/Russert on MTP) touched have had non-stop, commercial free coverage. It's what "families do," when there is a death of an "elder."

Still, the coverage seems so "Over the Top" that some more cynical minds might start to wonder "What's Up With That?" It's one thing to be beloved by your colleagues (many of whose careers you made ...like Nora O'Donnell (she said she was hired at 25 years by Russert) and the good folks like Olbermann...and the questionable ones like Brian Williams, David Gregory, Tucker Carlson, David Schuster) who were hired when Russert was a the PEAK of his career as the GURU of NBC...Director of News.

The coverage makes one wonder what is going to "come out, eventually" about Russert that would cause so much Eulogizing and Tearing from General Electric. Is it something to do with the Libby Trial and his testimony there? Is it something about how a Bush White House employee "testified under oath" that Russert was where we went if we wanted to get our "point of view out?"

Russert was "Washington Establishment." His wife writes for "Vanity Fair" and they are part of the DC Social Circuit where "news is made and politics is family."

Chris Matthews (fresh back from Paris) showed up at the Russert Wake late this afternoon and made a very "cryptic statement." He said. Russert was like that old radio show "The Shadow." He went on to say.."Only the Shadow knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men." Matthews seemed to be saying that "only Russert knew "where the bodies were buried." I think Matthews might know alot that we here on DU who care about a "truthful media" might want to know.

What "DID" Russert know about the "Evil that LURKS IN THE HEARTS OF MEN." :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. well that blurb about his wife made me like him a little more
vanity fair is my favorite magazine. a must read every month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did you read her article about the "Vanishing of the Washington Insider Establishement?"
It was in VF...and it was an interesting read. If you want to read it...I'll find you the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "When Washington was Fun!" by Maureen Orth...(Russert's Wife) ...a good readl...
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/socialDC200712

When Washington Was Fun
The grand hostesses are history, the president would rather be in bed, and there’s a price tag on every evening these days. Who killed Washington society? Ask a few of the local experts.



by Maureen Orth December 2007


The Kennedys entertain the André Malrauxs, 1962. By Robert Knudsen/courtesy of the John F. Kennedy Library.

Red Fay, undersecretary of the navy under John F. Kennedy, was a charming bon vivant, a great pal of the president’s, and the uncle of my roommate at Berkeley in the 60s. So it was my great good luck, on my very first trip to the capital, in May 1964, just six months after Kennedy’s assassination, to have “Uncle Red” invite me to dinner on the presidential yacht, the Sequoia. A few minutes after we arrived on board, I was amazed to see not only Jackie Kennedy but also Bobby and Ethel Kennedy and Jean Kennedy Smith and her husband, Steve Smith, walking up the gangplank. They were followed by George Stevens Jr., the youthful head of the U.S. Information Agency’s motion-picture division; the Peruvian ambassador and his wife; and my roommate’s parents, Mr. and Mrs. Charles McGettigan, of San Francisco. This was one of Jackie’s first nights out since the tragedy, but she greeted everyone graciously. She was in ethereal white and spoke little during dinner, except to the historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., who was seated to her right.

What I remember most vividly about that evening was an exchange I had with Bobby Kennedy, the attorney general. “What are you going to be next, vice president or senator?,” I asked rather impudently, because I did not want him to think I was a brainless bimbo. The question of how the Kennedy dynasty would proceed was very much in the air, for Lyndon Johnson had not yet announced a running mate. “What do you think I should be?,” Kennedy shot back, his steel-blue eyes boring into me. “Well, I think you should be senator,” I said, “because everyone remembers you trying to twist arms at the last convention, and I don’t think Lyndon Johnson will let you be vice president.” He then opened up a barrage of questions: “Who are you? What does your father do?” In the middle of one of my answers, he turned away and waved to a group of tourists on a boat at least a hundred yards from us across the Potomac. I was highly insulted, for I had been planning to enlist in the Peace Corps, whose director was his brother-in-law Sargent Shriver, and suddenly Bobby Kennedy seemed to me like just another pol. (In those days he was still closer to J. Edgar Hoover than to César Chávez or Martin Luther King Jr.)

The dinner was great fun, however, with lots of jokes and toasts, and the next day Uncle Red took me out to Hickory Hill, Bobby and Ethel’s residence in McLean, Virginia. R.F.K., in cutoff jeans, was playing touch football on the front lawn. Ethel, wearing a two-piece bathing suit, was visibly pregnant. In the driveway, a limousine waiting to take the attorney general “up to New York” was sure proof, I felt, that he must be going for the Senate. (Like Hillary Clinton, R.F.K. became an instant resident of the state, and he went on to defeat incumbent Ken Keating.) “Bobby,” Red Fay said, “I brought Maureen out here so you could give her some advice about her life.” Bobby smiled. “Advise her?” he said. “Hell, last night she told me what to do!”

J.F.K. and Jackie at the 1962 Nobelists dinner, seated between Pearl Buck and Robert Frost. By Robert Knudsen/courtesy of John F. Kennedy Library.

That trip to the capital allowed me to catch a glimpse of what I thought life in society must be like at the highest level, and to talk to the people who lived it. There was no agenda, no fund-raising, and a young woman like me could actually be allowed in close. In her three years in Washington, Jackie Kennedy set a standard against which social behavior here is still measured. Her White House was a locus of beauty, taste, and excellence. At the dinner the Kennedys gave for French author and cultural minister André Malraux in May 1962, for example, the guests included Tennessee Williams, Arthur Miller, Saul Bellow, Robert Penn Warren, Mark Rothko, Andrew Wyeth, Isaac Stern, George Balanchine, Leonard Bernstein, Robert Lowell, Elia Kazan, Charles Lindbergh, David Rockefeller, and Adam Clayton Powell, the outspoken Harlem congressman.

Just 12 days before that, they had given a dinner for 49 Nobel Prize winners, which the staff referred to as “the brains dinner.” That evening Jack gave an often quoted toast: “I think this is the most extraordinary collection of talent, of human knowledge, that has ever been gathered together at the White House, with the possible exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.” And before those two momentous events, the First Couple had thrown a sumptuous state dinner for the Shah of Iran.

Today, people who remember those days never cease to lament how the capital has changed. The cost of running for office, the proliferation of lobbyists, the intense preoccupation with security since 9/11, the increase in careers for women, the deaths or withdrawals of ruling society figures, and an unpopular president and an unpopular war have all converged to kill much of the fun and excitement once unique to Washington social life. I spoke to a number of participants in, and close observers of, the Washington social scene then and now in order to hear what they have to say about how “the city of conversation,” as Henry James called it, has become more partisan, less tolerant, and unabashedly focused on doing well rather than doing good.

Letitia Baldrige, social secretary to Jackie Kennedy and author of Taste: For the Kennedys, the criteria of a White House guest list were great minds, people of substance, doers, and the cultural scene—painters, composers, actors. We all contributed to the guest lists, because the Kennedys cared about it. Jackie and the president went over the lists very carefully. They knew there always had to be a few fat cats, but the majority of people were those who deserved to be there.… It was the best in everything—and hold back the political paybacks so they don’t take over the guest list. The Kennedys would ask, “Where are the interesting people who make the place go?” President Kennedy used to throw the whole list in the wastebasket, he’d be so mad when he saw a list of all the political paybacks that have to go in. The Kennedys would just say no and would throw it away.

Sally Quinn, author, co-founder of the blog On Faith, wife of former Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee, and Georgetown hostess: The biggest difference is that entertaining now is so much more partisan. When I first came here, you’d go to dinner and all different political persuasions were represented. You were all working for the same country, but you differed in what you thought was best for the country.… The people who did the entertaining were women who today would have a career, and what they did for a living was to bring people together. At parties, a lot of news was made and deals were made. That rarely exists anymore.

Much more of an interesting article from "times gone by" by Russert's wife...here...

http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/socialDC200712
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. i haven't read that as i recall -
though i'm a little behind on my reading. you don't need to trouble yourself though i appreciate the offer. do you know what month it was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reminds me of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. MSNBC and networks still at it about Russert....Something BIG to come down? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC