Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New vocabulary in the anti-choice movement....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:23 AM
Original message
New vocabulary in the anti-choice movement....
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 12:24 AM by pepperbear
I notice that "pre-born" has replaced "unborn". Anyone else notice this?

On edit: this is very significant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. So does that make us all pre-dead? *That's* going to go over well.
Will these folks just stop already? They embarrass and defame their religion by this inanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree, but think of the undecideds out there, the cud chewers...
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 12:46 AM by pepperbear
"unborn" doesn't imply life at conception, but to the gullible, "pre born" sure could.

Also, remember that these people have a problem with an egg not getting fertilized at ALL. Even that is murder to them.

I think it's dangerous. It could backfire, or it could be the smartest thing they've ever done. Only time will tell.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. pre-dead? oh no!!!!!
just think of of all those vampire and zombie novels that are going to be so outdated!

"and then sharon saw that he was one of the pre-dead. she was about to scream when she realized that everyone was one of the pre-dead. she happily turned over and went back to sleep."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Well, isn't "pre-dead" better than "undead"?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. ....
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 01:43 AM by mcctatas
:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. For the GOP teenagers would then be "pre-soldiers". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. no, i haven't noticed. where did you hear this?
i'm sick to death of these people. i really have "zero tolerance" for shit in my middle age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Here's one....
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200806/CUL20080606a.html

Pro-Lifers Campaign Against Pill-Induced Abortions

*snip*

"The pill can kill pre-born babies, which is why American Life League decided this campaign would be the best way to reach as many women as possible," Hahnenberg said.

Their new target? Birth control pills.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. my god.
what is it that kills their intelligence? lack of vitimins? interbreeding? religion? peaking out on an 8th grade education? the sun? what the fuck is WRONG with these people??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is significant. The anti-choice movement has been dominating the framing
What I don't understand is why NARAL and NOW and all the other organizations don't get their own framing out there. They haven't changed their language in 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Kind of puts the "lie" to the idea that they have the "power" so
many accuse them of, doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. They being....
(just making I understood you)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. "NARAL and NOW and all the other organizations" to whom you
referred in your previous post.

Hope that helps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Yes, and thank you.
And I agree with you. Language is power, and these groups have just let themselves be bulldozed. I think they may have gotten overconfident early on and never quite recovered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I don't think "they" allowed themselves to be bulldozed as much
as they WERE bulldozed.

The "dominant" "paradigm" (if you'll pardon the use of that now cliched word (apologizes to grammarians)), has applied to "them" a power which they have never had.

Nor do I believe "they" became overconfident - though "they" may have been portrayed as such.

The "media", whether r/w "pundit"/hacks or whatever it is that passes as the dominant talking-head, has portrayed those who would speak against the dominant paradigm as having far more power and influence than they actually have/had in an effort to cut off any potential power they may actually acquire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. From memory of news articles...
first they were --

family planning clinics

then they were --

women's health clinics

then they were --

women's clinics

then they were --

clinics

then they were --

abortion clinics

A hierarchy of value descending in importance - family -> women's health -> women -> clinic -> abortion

I wouldn't worry, were I you. I've been assured by many of my fellow Democrats and liberals and progressives that's it's just words; well, unless it's the Democrat Party rather than the Democratic Party; in which case it's "fightin' words".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's like used cars...pretty soon a fetus will be "certified pre-born" or some shit.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. I think that must be those "snowflake" babies
(or whatever the hell they're called) - certified pre-born fetus (with limited warranty until birth)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've been hearing this for quite some time.
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. Good catch.
The GOP are known for their "creative" use of the English language.

Check out this list of words to describe themselves and the section following it to describe people who don't necessarily agree with them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Well at least he is not gay!
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 01:35 AM by chknltl
(Please refer to the photo in your link)

I could easily tell that he is not gay because of the turtleneck sweater he is wearing but for those who were less observant, the words "not gay" are written below the photo.


:rofl:

(edited for spell-check and a minor restructure)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Luntz is an ass.
Just like every closeted fucker shilling for the GOP.

They may know how to manipulate words better than most, but they can't seem to "get" spin how ugly their image is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. i'll stick with my pro-fetus
for them. since they doen't seem to give ashit about babies or children. or what situation children have to live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedleyMisty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I saw a bumper sticker the other day
that said something like "You 'had' a choice - to keep your legs closed."

That's pretty much what it is - punishing women for having and enjoying sex. The actual children are just the emotional wedge to get responses from people who don't have huge hangups and issues about sex.

I think that's my biggest issue with Christianity and why St. Augustine is on my list for top 10 worst humans of all time - imagine how the world could be different if people weren't indoctrinated with the idea that sex is some nasty evil sinful thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Blonde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. It is really pretty ridiculous
since there is a whole book of the Bible about the joys of having sex.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. St. Augustine
was absolutely brilliant. If you're going to throw out all the brilliant thinkers of Western civilization because of their bizarre ideas about women, there's no men left. You have to sift the good from the bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Someone came up with the "Cuban Citizenship Criteria"...
...and how it should apply to babies as well.

It goes something like this:

they are considered citizens once they set foot on American soil and not before then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. Oh shit, never mind those Pre Thinkers....They are so passionate....and obstinate,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. i was thinking about the vocabulary the other day
because of a thread posted here on DU. it used the term "pro-life" to mean "anti-choice." and it's bullshit when you consider how many so-called "pro-life" people are also "pro-war" and war is incompatible with life.

it's a marketing ploy obviously. and the anti-choice people are behind the times if they're just coming out with this now. car dealers been selling "pre-owned" cars for years. but let's get real - we know they are used cars. "pre-born" = a pregnancy.

i responded that i am pro-life and pro-choice. and would add that the pro-choice movement should not indulge the opposition by embracing terminology that confuses the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Maybe we should call it pro-something else, like...
...pro doctor?

Or pro-21st Century?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC