Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chilling Time Magazine article, Aug. 02, 2001: "So Far, Bush is Only Play-Acting as President"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:27 PM
Original message
Chilling Time Magazine article, Aug. 02, 2001: "So Far, Bush is Only Play-Acting as President"
Talk radio personality Ray Taliaferro links to this article on his Web Site:

So Far, Bush is Only Play-Acting as President
Thursday, Aug. 02, 2001 By LANCE MORROW

http://www.kgoam810.com/goout.asp?u=http://www.time.com/time/columnist/morrow/article/0,9565,169869,00.html

It's early yet. But not that early.

George W. Bush's term is one-eighth gone, and there remains a curious lifelessness at the heart of his administration, a quality of grumpy somnambulism. Or something.

What movie is screening itself in the Bushies' heads, what visions project themselves there? None that I can make out. There's no plot, no clarity. The script needs work. Bush is indulging in WASP Zen, that reticence that is the sound of one hand clapping, a self-confident smirk meant to signal a resolute and maybe cunning refusal to be ingratiating to the rest of the world, about Kyoto or anything else.

That approach might be the beginning of something admirable or original — if the man at the center, who gives the administration its name, were really at the center. But we don't see him there, we don't feel him, we don't hear him. He has an agenda, but it is not sufficiently articulated, not persuasively proclaimed.

What our heat-sensors pick up at the center is Dick Cheney. The vice presidency, historically a vacuum and nonentity — not worth a pitcher of warm spit, as John Nance Garner said (actually, he mentioned a liquid slightly more colorful) — has become, by an odd default, the engine room, even as Cheney ferries his ticker in and out of the Coronary Care Unit.

The narrative line of the Bush administration may crystallize. The president's virtues may manifest themselves by and by.

Or perhaps a theme will be thrust upon him, the way that "crises" used to be thrust upon Richard Nixon, and maybe W. will rise to an occasion we do not yet see.



Perhaps, like Mr. Toad, he will be magnificent.

But the 2002 elections are already kicking up dust on the horizon. And now, for the first time, Bush's poll numbers have dropped below 50. If I were Karen Hughes or Karl Rove, I would have trouble sleeping.

What we have here is a failure to communicate. Polls rise and fall. Public opinion blows this way or that from month to month. The Bush problem runs deeper. George W. Bush has failed to connect with the American people. It begins to seem possible — probable — that he is incapable of making the connection.

During the campaign, Bush kept up a line of brave talk that went like this: "I'm a leader...that's what a leader does...a leader leads!" No: Leading means doing something that George W. Bush has failed to do. Sometimes when I see him in the White House, there pops into my mind the image of the sixties student radical puffing on a cigar, with his feet propped on the Columbia University president's desk. I have the disconcerted sense that the President of the United State is play-acting.

Play-acting is part of a president's game, of course, but he had better be wonderful at it. The presidency is the world's most powerful theater. I don't think that George W. Bush, as a performer, will be rated with Ronald Reagan or Franklin Roosevelt.

Strange. What is Bush waiting for? Why does he not talk to the American people? Why does he not explain himself, his policies, his direction? Much of what he has to offer makes sense, and may be handsomely saleable.

Bush came into the White House counting too much on a prissy moral contrast between his way of conducting himself, and Bill Clinton's. It was slightly hilarious the other day to see Clinton — easy and shameless and smart as the devil himself — presenting the gaudy carnival of Bubba to his new neighbors in Harlem.

Clinton was — is — almost corruptly articulate. He can sell anything. No WASP Zen there. A policy of well bred, conspiratorial inarticulation works only in a society of like-minded gentlemen. In the diverse and noisily media-driven United States, a nation accustomed to theatrical politics, George W. Bush needs, first, to get both hands clapping, and, second, to figure out what they are clapping for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anybody who doesn't think MIHOP isn't paying attention.
n't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, a "crisis thrust upon him"...
...remarkable coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. In September 2000 (yes, 2000) I predicted we'd be in a major shooting war in the M.E. ...
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 11:43 PM by TahitiNut
... before the end of 2001, precipitated by some atrocious event, if G.W. Bush were elected. I was certain of it and I posted that prediction on an ISP (AtHome) newsgroup at that time. It was my guess that we'd have large numbers of troops fighting in Afghanistan, Iran, or Iraq.

I really don't know why it wasn't clearer to many others. It seemed obvious. I usually sneer at "crystal ball gazers" and rarely make such predictions myself, but this just seemed obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I had the same experience...
But I was at the time so remote from politics, having been burned by it in the past, that it seemed like a joke. When Bush was so obviously placed in office against the undeniable election results, given even a rudimentary understanding of the Bush gang and its priors, and the return of the whole fucking crew of Iran-Contra killers to official positions, it was clear - just as it was clear with the first Bush in 1988 - that big wars would follow. That's all they know, and it's all that is left for imperialism to do at this particular stage of crisis. Since Bush had actually lost the election, indicating that Americans really weren't so hot on this brand of politics, my "joke" - meant seriously - was, "When is the Reichstag Fire?" I thought of the happenings as a large, predictable, historical farce. It took the sight of Rumsfeld and Kissinger palling it up with Joschka Fischer at the Mar. 2001 NATO security conference in Munich (I lived in Germany until 2004) to jolt me into remembering that the living dead were back in charge, that this would mean blood. My jokes turned into dread. It took the sight of the Towers aflame to remind me that shit: this thing was always going to hit my hometown first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Prior to the 2000 election I had seriously considered enlisting.
But then the jackass weaseled his way into the presidency and I just said "well, fuck it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yup. Iowa is flooded, gas is approaching $5.00 a gallon, and Bush is having high tea with the queen.
And yet we're the party that's considered out of touch with America. :grr: :argh: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC