Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYTimes Op/Ed For Monday Is On Siegelman Case: "Congress Should Compel Rove To Testify"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:39 AM
Original message
NYTimes Op/Ed For Monday Is On Siegelman Case: "Congress Should Compel Rove To Testify"
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 12:48 AM by Hissyspit
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/opinion/16mon2.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

EDITORIAL
A Case of Politics

Published: June 16, 2008

- snip -

While Congress examines those allegations, Mr. Siegelman is asking the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, to reverse his case on the law. Mr. Siegelman was accused of reappointing Richard Scrushy, then the chief executive of HealthSouth, to a health care board in exchange for a contribution to a referendum campaign for a state lottery.

Mr. Siegelman was convicted of bribery and related crimes and sentenced to more than seven years, and served nine months before being freed on appeal.

Laws against bribery must be used carefully. It is not a crime for an elected official to appoint a campaign contributor to a position. If it were, many ambassadors and judges — and the presidents and governors who appointed them — would be in jail. And partisan prosecutors would have far too much power to punish elected officials they did not like. For an appointment to be illegal, there needs to be an express quid pro quo — something the prosecutors did not prove in Mr. Siegelman’s case.

Even the highly partisan Bush Justice Department appears to be losing confidence in its case. It originally appealed Mr. Siegelman’s sentence, hoping to add more than 20 years. It recently withdrew the appeal without explanation.

Congress should compel Mr. Rove to testify. And it should keep investigating this prosecution and what role crass politics may have played. While it does, the 11th Circuit should cast a skeptical eye on this case, based on the law and the facts.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Finally this is getting the attention it deserves! Rec'd! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. If the prosecution did not prove the case against Siegelman, then there was something rotten in the
prosecution for bringing the case, the judge for not throwing the case out, and each member of the jury who voted to convict thus making a complete mockery of the criminal justice system and the equal justice under the law doctrine. Welcome to junior's banana republic. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. What is Congress doing?
Why hasn't Rove been arrested yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Without question. He must come to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. wow!. . the NYT!. . . .my my my
And how long did THAT take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. OK Nancy and John...
Isn't this all the establishment political cover you need to invoke Inherent Contempt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC