Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vatican bans 'godless' Da Vinci Code sequel Angels & Demons from Rome churches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:40 AM
Original message
Vatican bans 'godless' Da Vinci Code sequel Angels & Demons from Rome churches
By Malcolm Moore in Rome
16/06/2008
The Vatican has banned the makers of Angels & Demons, the latest book from Da Vinci Code bestseller Dan Brown to be turned into a movie, from entering the Holy See and any church in Rome.

The movie, the sequel to the enormously successful The Da Vinci Code, sees Tom Hanks reprise his role as Harvard professor Robert Langdon. This time, however, Mr Langdon is on a mission to save the Vatican from being blown up by a canister of anti-matter.

The entire film is set in Rome, and Sony Pictures applied for permission to film two key scenes inside the churches of Santa Maria del Popolo and Santa Maria della Vittoria.

The plot of the book sees Mr Langdon arriving in Santa Maria della Vittoria to find a cardinal being set on fire.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2139472/Vatican-bans-%27godless%27-Da-Vinci-Code-sequel-Angels-andamp-Demons-from-Rome-churches.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are they banned from filming in the churches, or from entering them even to pray?
And if the latter, are they allowed to take communion on the front steps?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Dan Brown is a rapscallion. The Vicariate has done well to deny them access."
Franco Zeffirelli, the director of Jesus of Nazareth, told the Corriere della Sera.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2139472/Vatican-bans-%27godless%27-Da-Vinci-Code-sequel-Angels-andamp-Demons-from-Rome-churches.html

Well, he would say that, wouldn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Rapscallion"?
Now there's a word I haven't heard in a very long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. I hadn't heard "Trollop" for a long time until recently, either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. What skulduggery is this?
Forsooth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Google "Cindy McCain Trollop" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yeah, I know
I just wanted an excuse to use the word "skulduggery", seeing as it seems to be Resurrect an Archaic Word Month or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I think the last time I heard it, it was pronounced "wapscallion"
1 geek point to whoever names the character and film first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Pontius Pilate in Life of Bwian?
I mean, Brian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Cowect!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. "cannister of antimatter?"
HAHAHAHAHAHA!

And we thought the crystal skulls were funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why couldn't it have been a chalice of Satan's blood? Or a vessel of Hellfire? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes, something that wouldn't take
a nuclear power plant to generate an adequate magnetic containment vessel.

I'll probably see this one for a major hoot to find out how they managed to keep the antimatter from annihilating the cannister it's supposedly sitting in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's actually a fun read.
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 11:48 AM by gatorboy
Much better than that bore The DaVinci code in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. You don't believe in crystal skulls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The science in that book was atrocious.
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 12:26 PM by Evoman
And the representation of CERN was just weird.

Here is a link to CERN's discussion of the book:

http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/Spotlight/SpotlightAandD-en.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. It's a book that
offends many groups:

Catholics, Scientists, and anybody with decent literary tastes!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Schwing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Maybe the story takes place in an alternate universe with Star Trek physics?
Seems like they were forever carrying anti-matter around in something the size of a thermos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. They also have McForce Fields
Presumably this exercise in dumbfuckery takes place in the here and now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Blown up by a canister of anti-matter"
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 11:51 AM by Akoto
Damn USS Enterprise. This is what happens when they litter their warp core waste all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. there are pretty many pictures for Angels & Demons to
obtain of all these places...if there is any one book that scares the Hell out of the vatican Angels and Demons would

its pretty obvious the Vatican is afraid thats why the denial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Actually, "The DaVinci Code" is the sequel to "Angels & Demons"
"Angels and Demons" was published in 2000 and DaVinci in 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good for them...
Strange words to hear from a noted atheist like me. That's their right. I'd only hope they'd go so far as to deny anybody working on the film rites of reconciliation and the communion. (Meaningless really, but meaningful to some people.)

As terrible as the holy See might be, and believe me I know first hand exactly how evil the Roman Catholic church can be, Dan Brown is no better...a Maria Monk for the new century. Religion is delusional, but anti-catholicism is evil...as much so as anti-semitism, anti-protestantism, anti-paganism, persecution of atheists,... (I can go on.)

The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend. Brown is little more than a well-read Jack Chick (that is...an anti-catholic peddling his own brand of bullshit equally or more dangerous), with friends like him I have no need of enemies.

Every page wasted printing Brown's shit is another page that could have borne great thinkers and writers like Vonnegut, Russell, Sartre and Dawkins to the masses. He is a thinker-lite, a fraud of literature. I wish him arthritis and a mute tongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Honestly....
I thought the book was absolute shit, so I can't blame them.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. For awhile after that book, I called all of my bowel movements "Dan Brown"
As in, "Excuse me, I have to take a Dan Brown"

This persisted until I became aware of Sanjaya, at which time the name was replaced.

Right now, I call it Tim Russert.

What, to soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. i'd support banning dan brown novels from bookstore shelves.
what banal bilge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good - for a different reason
Film making can be very disruptive, even with the best of intentions. Whether you subscribe to their religion or not, these are places of worship and have daily services: IMHO going into them, setting up equipment, getting in the way of the people who normally use the church and filming a potboiler for the studio's profit is disrespectful. Especially when said potboiler accuses you of various murders and other malfeasances. Kinda like biting the hand then asking for the handout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC