Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Gay People"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:12 PM
Original message
"Gay People"
Why is the emphasis always on "Gay" and hardly ever on "People"?

Many people were able to get married in California starting tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because gay people couldn't get married in CA before tonight
Which is a newsworthy event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes, many gay people that weren't allowed to before.
Gay people could not get legally married yesterday, i could but they couldn't, this day is about equality for gay people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. You're lucky if they actually say people, and not just "the gays!!!11"
Edited on Mon Jun-16-08 10:19 PM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Well, FAUX is probably saying "the homosexuals"
And when Pat Robertson has a stroke on tomorrow morning's 700 Club, he'll probably say "the godless Sodomites".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Those people could have gotten married yesterday too
Just not to other gay people.

Hence, the emphasis on "gay."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm 57 and can remember back when the word "gay"
was not yet used, except when folks like my mom would confess that a few cocktails made her feel gay. I don't believe this will become a wedge issue this election. People are maturing. When the subject of gay marriages in Cal. came up a work today, even the righties said they no longer cared. It seems to me sometimes that the only people who get riled are the ones who are afraid of their own sexuality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, some of the posturing he-men seem to be threatened. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I was pretty cheerful on my wedding day too, LOL, & I wish the newlyweds every happiness
Mr. H and I both actually get kinda teary-eyed at the prospect of so much hopeful happiness for other people. I personally know at least one set of parents that are going to be overjoyed at the prospect of their son getting married to his partner.

Hekate

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. i love ya -- but i am a gay person --
if it's not the best thing about me -- it's one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's like "gay" (silent snicker) people. I hear it too
by some of the talking heads on tv. Bah.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack_DeLeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. I just say gays...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. I agree with your point. It's the subtle but obvious reality behind the headline.
Yes, it was only gay people who couldn't get married yesterday... but that's only because the predicate came before the substantive. It's crucial to our victory that substantive come before predicate. It's also why we're winning. Not everyone can relate to gay, but everyone is capable of grasping the "people" aspect. That "person" reminds me of my grandmother, brother, neighbor, etc (i.e. reminds me of someone whom I believe to be a "person".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Because the word has 'negative' contentations...
for some people. 'Gay', is like an evil that wants to destroy the known world to those morons. When some one says "I think he is Gay" it is said with a "Oh, really?" Like, being Gay makes up your entire being.

The term Homosexual has the same effect on people, the stupid and uneducated rethug people. Those fuckwads would be pleased if it was still 1950.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC