Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Absurdity of Limiting the Scope of the Congressional Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 01:57 PM
Original message
The Absurdity of Limiting the Scope of the Congressional Hearing
Tuesday, June 17, 2008

The Absurdity of Limiting the Scope of the Congressional Hearing

Marty Lederman

If you're not watching the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, you ought to be. This is the first time to my knowledge that any legislators -- incuding, but not limited to, Senators Levin, Graham, McCaskill and Reed -- have really started putting together what happened in the military, have begun to express how absurd it is that high-level officials concluded that these various techniques were lawful and permissible.

The problems at GTMO, however -- and Iraq after 4/2003 -- can't really be understood without taking account of the fact that the CIA and the DOD Special Forces had previously been authorized to engage in the same sorts of abuses, and had regularly engaged in those abuses in Iraq and Afghanistan, very much to the knowledge of the interrogators and officers who later considered such things at GTMO and elsewhere. From what I've seen, the Committee is working under the assumption that it may not have any public discussions of the CIA and Special Ops, because the conduct of those agencies is "classified." But that means that they're hamstrung by having to basically begin in the middle of the story, without any of the background or context.

There is no good reason that the discussion of the CIA and Special Ops stories should not be just as public and just as detailed and probing as the discussion of the GTMO and 2003 Iraq abuses. The stories are basically the same, raising the same legal questions, much of the same cast of characters, and, for the most part, the same patterns of conduct, as to similar detainees. When will the Senate start resisting the Administration's insistence that the mere designation of something as "classified" automatically means the Senate cannot have any public deliberations about it?


Start from the beginning, presidential power: Charlie Savage: Cheney Plotted Bush’s Imperial Presidency ‘Thirty Years Ago’




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. its far past time to peel open this rotten fruit we call government.
Edited on Tue Jun-17-08 02:09 PM by bullimiami
false claims of national security and secrecy are antithetical to democracy.

open it all up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "open it all up." Yup. This is the stuff the media (if they cared) should be harping on
When will the Senate start resisting the Administration's insistence that the mere designation of something as "classified" automatically means the Senate cannot have any public deliberations about it?


This point was debated during the Mukasey confirmation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. the senate should have the same rights to see secure documents as the WH.
This executive branch treats them as an enemy rather than as part of our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caffeinefwee Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. this is the "we're not accountable" administration
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 08:43 PM by caffeinefwee
4 anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caffeinefwee Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. KICK
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC