Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wall Street is in the midst of its biggest, ugliest, worst round of layoffs in decades.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:32 PM
Original message
Wall Street is in the midst of its biggest, ugliest, worst round of layoffs in decades.
Edited on Tue Jun-17-08 06:14 PM by KoKo01
Last One Left, Please Turn Out the Lights
Wall Street is in the midst of its biggest, ugliest, worst round of layoffs in decades.

In 25 years on Wall Street, I have never seen things this bad. We’ve had some tough times: the 1987 stock-market crash, the collapse of the once-all-powerful Drexel Burnham Lambert, the immolation of Long Term Capital, the post-9/11 calamity, and the dot-com implosion. Every one of these events rocked the Street, causing pay cuts and layoffs and creating a sense of doom. But this time is different; it’s doom itself.

Wall Street closely guards its layoff numbers, but piece together the evidence and a grim picture appears: an estimated worldwide total of 4,000 dismissals at Morgan Stanley, 5,000 at Merrill Lynch, 7,000 at UBS, and 16,000 at Citigroup. Even the extremely profitable Goldman Sachs is letting people go in some departments. Then there’s Bear Stearns. A year ago, Bear was the firm to work at. People talked of the Era of Bear. Now it’s gone. Vanished. With more than 10,000 of its 14,000 former employees either looking for work or soon to be laid off by its new owner, JPMorgan. Right, JPMorgan—the firm that seemed to pants the Fed and Treasury when it snapped up Bear Stearns for a pittance. Well, it now appears possible that Morgan may have grossly underestimated how terrible the Bear bond portfolio may be. The thinking on the Street was that Morgan couldn’t miss; it got $30 billion in guarantees against losses. But now it looks like the losses might exceed the guarantees. For those of us looking to Morgan as the best-capitalized play on Wall Street after Goldman, one that could emerge as a strong player when things get better, the possibility that the Fed got the better end of the deal is chilling. As if all that weren’t bad enough, news came last week that Lehman Brothers is fighting for its corporate life. As someone who has great respect for Lehman CEO Dick Fuld, I’m stunned at the size of the reported $2.8 billion loss for the quarter just finished, especially considering how confident the company was about its prospects for that quarter a couple of months ago. They just raised $6 billion in capital at what I thought were fire-sale prices, but immediately the stock went below the $28 offering price, even though that figure already represented a hefty discount versus the previous week’s price. The people who bought into this deal have to feel like they just leased an apartment in Dresden after the first 400 bombers hit, not realizing that there were another 900 behind them. Lehman’s compensation costs are so out of control that it’s going to need to break out the electric bleachers to downsize ahead of the short-selling posse. It already reassigned CFO Erin Callan and COO Joseph Gregory. The 28,100 overpaid, underworked employees who remain in place are simply ballast on Lehman’s leaky ship.

In typical times, the castoffs from these sinking (or sunk) firms would have no problem finding jobs. When Drexel collapsed, or Deutsche Bank picked off Bankers Trust, or Prudential eliminated its equities business, there was always some shop on the rise, looking to hire. But these are not typical times. This time around, no firm—no area of the business—is rising. Every product, from stocks and bonds to mergers and acquisitions to corporate finance, is under pressure at every bank. The clients themselves, fresh from getting talked into buying horrid complex products, many of them mortgage-related, are not exactly eager to buy anything exotic, which is where the big fees have been coming from in recent years. Worse, the same clients sold lots of those exotic products back to the firms that issued them, and I don’t believe all the write-downs on that acid-reflux inventory have been taken yet, particularly at Lehman, Merrill, and Citigroup. I expect tens of billions more in write-downs from those three firms alone.

At the same time, a host of other profit sources are drying up. Private-equity deals have shut down almost completely, as the slowdown in the economy has stoked fears that the newly privatized, debt-laden companies won’t be able to make good on their bonds. The banks are no longer generating profits from lending hedge funds billions to buy product, because the brokers ended up taking a beating when the clients borrowed too much and then began to default on those loans. The bankers and brokers had moved aggressively into these fixed-income revenue rivers in the first place because the equities-trading game, long a mainstay of all of these firms, had become so commoditized that it was impossible to make money from it. To make matters worse, former attorney general Eliot Spitzer destroyed a once-sweet fee-generating scam—the practice in which banks’ research departments wrote rosy reports about companies in order to win their investment-banking business and rake in the M&A profits. No wonder all of these stocks are at or near their multiyear lows, depths not seen since the dot-com aftermath of 2002, when Wall Street last shriveled.

More at............
http://nymag.com/news/businessfinance/bottomline/47823/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Weep not
From 2006:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&refer=home&sid=atEk12XYMerk

"Nov. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Never in the history of Wall Street have so many earned so much in so little time.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch & Co., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Bear Stearns Cos. are about to reward their 173,000 employees with $36 billion of bonuses. That's a 30 percent increase from last year's record, and it doesn't include the billions more that will be paid by Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., the three largest U.S. banks, as well as the hundreds of hedge funds and private-equity firms that constitute the financial industry."


For the record, that's $208,000 each on average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cool! The CEOs should get HUGE bonuses this X-Mas
All those layoffs are always good for the board's bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why am I having trouble
feeling great sympathy for unemployed investment bankers? I should feel terrible for anyone who's lost their job, no matter whether they are machinists or bus drivers or bond traders. Yet somehow I am unmoved. Am I a bad liberal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Because...all those people are going to be selling Condo's, Beach Houses and interests in Everything
and Economy Implosion of those Rich Swindlers will drift down to the REST OF US! We are all gonna be in the same "life raft" from the Titanic..or go down "with honor" with the TITANIC.

We are ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. When we see this "connection" is when we will finally realize who we are and KICK OUT THE MANIPULATORS OF GREED...who have Ruled us since "St. Ronnie Reagan!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. UBS
This corporation gave out severence pay letters to thousands of employees last month and only gave the recipients 10 days to decide whether or not to take the offer of one year's pay and benefits. Many employees had been working for investment banks before UBS bought them, having worked for 20+ years. What management didn't count on was that nearly every recipient opted to take the package, and now is contemplating how to select which recipient will be allowed to get the package and who will stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why isn't the article in all caps? It's Cramer talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-17-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Really...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC