Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My comments on Michael Reagan.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:09 AM
Original message
My comments on Michael Reagan.
From my latest blog entry, follow the link to read more.

The irony here is that Michael, for those who don’t know, is not the natural born son of Ronald Reagan; he’s Ron-ma’s adopted son. This means that we can’t put the blame for any of this shit on Reagan’s genes. This is because he was raised this way. "And if that’s how they’re going to be raised…" (to believe that brown people are only worth death by rectal grenade at age one) then they’re better off dying in their infancy. Too bad we didn’t have that option with Michael Reagan.

You see, Michael Reagan was born before Roe v. Wade became law, and that meant that he couldn’t be aborted, and had to be put up for adoption. As a result, he wound up in the Reagan household, where he was obviously taught to hate all inferior races and undesirable types. He wound up being raised by the man who created the myth of the welfare queen and laughed as AIDS destroyed almost an entire generation of homosexuals. He was raised to hate people who were not like him, and think them worth nothing but painful death.

Now, if Michael Reagan had been aborted, his soul might have cycled through, and been born into a child who had more of a chance of being raised in a loving and caring family, where he could be taught the beauty in everyone, instead of just being a handy prop for your dad’s incipient political career (see also: John McCain’s adopted Bangladeshi daughter). As a result, he might have been spared the trauma that leads him to statements like this. After all, if that’s how he’s going to be raised, he’s better off being ripped out of his mother’s wound with a coat hanger. Bye bye, baby.

What? You think that statement’s too extreme? Too hateful? You’re right. It is. Think about it, Michael.


©2008 P. Sungenis, all rights reserved.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. if that's how he was raised, then how do you explain Ron Reagan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nancy.
Michael was raised by Jane Wyman and Ronnie. Nancy was the moderating influence in Ron and Patti's lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I believe Wyman and Ronnie were both DEMOCRATS during
that time... I also believe Wyman remained a democrat throughout her life...

New theory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bigotry knows no party.
Strom Thurmond was a Democrat. George Wallace was a Democrat. Robert Byrd is STILL a Democrat.

Democrat != Paragon of virtue.

Ronnie and Jane were bigots. Period. They raised Michael Reagan that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Where is your proof of Jane Wyman being a bigot
They divorced in 1948. He changed parties in 1962. Where is your proof that Wyman was some horrible witch who instilled this hatred in Michael Reagan? Pray tell... We are all fascinated with your totally unsubstantiated thesus. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. A couple of qualifications to your premise.
1. Michael Reagan was raised mostly in the Jane Wyman household more than the Nancy Reagan household due to the divorce. He rarely saw his father and he often felt illegitimate as compared to Nancy's kids.

2. Michael Reagan wrote an autobiography where he remembered being sexually abused repeatedly at summer camp and he never told Ron, Jane, or Nancy or anyone for that matter about it. He carried around the shame and stigma into his adult years.

I can't pin how Michael Reagan turned out so much as his longing for an absent father and competing against him at the same time (shades of GW Bush!) as I do on his terrible childhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think it's how he was raised. I think it's based more on years of rejection.
From what I read, Raygun treated him as if didn't exist most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exactly. He was raised by the hired help.
Edited on Wed Jun-18-08 09:45 AM by kskiska
He was adopted by Jane Wyman and Ronald Reagan because Jane was too busy with her career to have a second child. Michael Reagan has written about this extensively in his first autobiography, "On the Outside, Looking In." He reflects on how after the divorce he and his sister sat on the curb waiting for his father to pick him up to take them out for the day. He began having trouble as a teenager and decided he wanted to live with his father and Nancy, but was told there was no room for him. Eventually he did go to live with them and was assigned a small room. Later, a construction crew began building an addition to the house, which he happily assumed was for him. One day the maid excitedly said to him, "Have you seen my new room?" Michael was given the maid's old room.

Ronald Reagan never liked Michael and called him a "schmuck." Michael proudly boasted to his classmates that his dad gave him a nickname.

When the Reagans were in the White House Michael was dressed down by Reagan for using his name in correspondence to promote himself in his various dubious enterprises. At that time his occupation was speedboat racer. The Secret Service banned Michael from the White House for stealing knick-knacks. Ronald and Nancy never even met Michael's child until he/she was three or so, while Nancy's pet project was "Foster Grandparents."

Michael longed for a father his whole life. Once his adoptive father became incapacitated he began publicly relatingg apocryphal stories of his loving relationship with his father.

Michael's book, written while on the outs with his father, is a wealth of inside information on their relationship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just an unprincipled opportunist like Saint Ronnie.
Michael used Ronnie's last name to make a career bashing liberals.

He would switch to bashing pukes if it made more money.

Saint Ronnie switched parties when it was to his advantage.

I'm baffled that Ron turned out so decent. I guess it was Nancy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hateful???
So it's OK for you to be hateful towards him, but it's not OK for him to act hateful toward others? Is that what I'm hearing?

If you decry others being hateful, maybe you should refrain from being hateful yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC