Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now that half the country is flooded, do we still want to rely on CORN for fuel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:44 PM
Original message
Now that half the country is flooded, do we still want to rely on CORN for fuel?
Edited on Wed Jun-18-08 01:48 PM by Atman
Never mind all the other reasons why it's lunacy to rely upon ethanol as an alternative to fossil fuels -- the pollution, the expense, the cost -- gosh, what would happen if some devastating storms came and flooded our farmlands and ruined the corn crop? What then, we switch from $4.50/gal gasoline to $5.00/ethanol AND won't be able to afford to eat anymore either?

Good deal. Not.

EDIT to add link to pics -- check out number 5. There's your dinner AND your next tankful.


.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R. I'm with you 100%. Food for fuel is a wildly stupid notion. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. We need biofuels, but not corn
There are other things we could be using that would not affect the food supply. I'm with you on that. Corn ethanol is not the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't agree with your question...
...I think it should be: Now that half the country is flooded, will we still allow the GOP to dictate our fuel policy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Neither the Democrats or the GOP is dictating fuel policy
Big Farm is and both parties are bowing down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. LOL! I don't think that's right either.
The GOP is dictating fuel policy, or haven't you heard about Cheney and his secret energy meetings, enron and the fact that the top players in this administration are oil people.

Sorry, some Dems may have some connections to oil, but it's no where near the level GOP is.

Dems are casual oil investors; the GOP are the illegal Enron speculating Saudi-buddies.

There is a huge difference, obvious even to people not addicted to news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I am talking about ethanol policy.
Both parties are up to their neck in it and Big Farm wouldn't let them off the leash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
Better than petro ... although big oil likes to spread the lie.

I dare you to eat the corn stock that goes into ethanol. Seriously, I dare you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. high fructose
I don't see why corn shortages are perceived as unavoidabvle when so much of it is used for high fructose corn syrup. Should any of that sweetener be produced now that we know the health risks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Looks like, at least in the medium-longterm, algae might be more appropriate
In addition to being less susceptible to floods
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope they rescued
that poor kitty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuel from corn was a terrible idea in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Putting (what could be) food in our fuel is a rather dumb idea......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. We should be putting food on our families.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC