Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Dems need to make sure the public knows that the oil companies already

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 06:10 PM
Original message
The Dems need to make sure the public knows that the oil companies already
hold leases to federal land that they AREN'T DRILLING ON that could DOUBLE US oil output according to the House Committee on Natural Resources. They have introduced a bill to make them use those fields or lose them. They are sitting idle and are leased but they aren't using the land.

House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick J. Rahall (D-WV) today introduced legislation that gives Big Oil one option - either "use it or lose it."

The 68 million acres of leased but inactive federal land have the potential to produce an additional 4.8 million barrels of oil and 44.7 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day. This would nearly double total U.S. oil production, and increase natural gas production by 75 percent. It would also cut U.S. oil imports by more than one-third, reducing America's dependency on foreign oil.

The Rahall bill would force oil and gas companies to either produce or give up federal onshore and offshore leases they are stockpiling by barring the companies from obtaining any more leases unless they can demonstrate that they are producing oil and gas, or are diligently developing the leases they already hold, during the initial term of the leases.

Lou Dobbs for one is pushing for the drilling and talking about the Dems as obstructionists and totally ignoring the newsman who mentioned the fact that the oil companies have land they aren't using. Hell they would have to search and may not find oil so it would have no effect on the price and they wouldn't have to do this with the land they have leased but not doing anything with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1.  "Use it or lose it" - I love it! FACTS here:



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

The President’s proposal sounds like another page from the Administration’s Energy Policy that was literally written by the oil industry: give away more public resources to the very same oil companies that are sitting on 68 million acres of federal lands they’ve already leased.


FACTS:

The fact is there are 68 million acres onshore and offshore in the U.S. that are leased by oil companies—open to drilling and actually under lease—but not developed.

If oil companies tapped the 68 million federal acres of leased land it would generate an estimated 4.8 million barrels of oil a day – six times what ANWR would produce at its peak.

The fact is 80 percent of the oil available on the Outer Continental Shelf is in regions that are already open to leasing—but the oil companies haven’t decided it’s worth their time to drill there.

The fact is that drilling in the Arctic Wildlife Refuge wouldn’t yield any oil for 10 years—and then would only save the consumer 1.8 cents per gallon in 2030.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. How about use it or the lease payments increase each year it is not used?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. None of these oil royalties are worth shit. Many of them are private--buy them if you want.
DRAYNAGE! So sorry, EV_Ares.

These are 60-year old leases on land that ran out of oil decades ago.

The 1/2 of the oil that is economically irrecoverable gets left in the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. they have been drilling and capping for decades.. lots of oil
and 60% of the price of oil is speculation..
we have oil riggers on both sides of the family.. drilling and capping oil and gas today, got uncles who've drilled and capped had and fast for over 30 years, all over, WA to the east coast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-18-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like the Dems are taking a cue from
Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska (of all things, she is a Repuplican. No, really) She did to Exxon, it was amazing how fast they changed their development plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC