Question: why NOT be revengeful against the 'pugs' and "Prez" for FISA?

[sicksicksick_N_tired]

Why isn't energy being spent on castrating those pushing the FISA shit?

:shrug:

Why are those facing obstacles and doing whatever possible under the circumstances to improve the situation being shredded?

:shrug:

Why's the SOURCE of the FISA problem not being attacked?

:shrug:

I have trouble understanding the "PMA can change everything" or the "stick to your guns" or "your thoughts make it happen" or other psychological structures justifying diversion from fact and reality and REAL LIFE operations/solutions.

In a democracy, beyond fundamental protections, there is no "MUST". The only people who are sponsors of violating our fundamental protections are those who have advantaged themselves of our executive and those squarely seated on one side of the aisle in Congress. Everyone else is,...almost DESPERATELY trying to deal with those little tyrants on the "right" side of the congressional aisle and that one seated in the executive.

If punishment MUST BE WAGED outside the judicial branch and in both this seriously FUCKED-UP CORPORATE media branch and the public-political arena,...REASON dictates the target.

On the other hand, "reason" is a word hardly consumed by desperate and confused, frustrated and distraught people. Oppressors LOVE that aspect of human beings and advantage off it, all the time.

[notadmblnd]

1. I'd like to see the tables turned and the FISA laws be used against them

The pretzledent is no better than us when it comes to eavesdropping. If a government entity suspects that he's committing a crime or conspiring to, then he could be wiretapped without knowing it also. Now we all know he's committed crimes, the question is does any government entity have the balls to go after him?