Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russ is correct...as usual

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:06 AM
Original message
Russ is correct...as usual
Statement of U.S. Senator Russ Feingold
On the FISA Deal


June 19, 2008

“The proposed FISA deal is not a compromise; it is a capitulation. The House and Senate should not be taking up this bill, which effectively guarantees immunity for telecom companies alleged to have participated in the President’s illegal program, and which fails to protect the privacy of law-abiding Americans at home. Allowing courts to review the question of immunity is meaningless when the same legislation essentially requires the court to grant immunity. And under this bill, the government can still sweep up and keep the international communications of innocent Americans in the U.S. with no connection to suspected terrorists, with very few safeguards to protect against abuse of this power. Instead of cutting bad deals on both FISA and funding for the war in Iraq, Democrats should be standing up to the flawed and dangerous policies of this administration.”

Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) is a member of the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.

http://feingold.senate.gov/~feingold/statements/08/06/20080619f.htm

---

House FISA vote

DEM
Yea - 105
Nay - 128

REP
Yea - 188
NAY - 1

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll437.xml

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Appeasement: They have offered up the 4th Amendment to the Chimperor.
For what?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. that's what I can't figure out, because this shit is NOT popular with voters..
either it's cowardice or greed. I don't know which is worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I have been trying to figure it out all evening.
What do we get out of it? NOTHING.... no worse. We LOSE something very dear and necessary for this democracy to continue.

What do they get out if it? THAT is the 64 trillion dollar question.

If they voted against the FISA bill, they would be hailed as heros by the voters, except for a few dipshits who have no understanding of our constitutional government.

Instead, they voted for it - against the American People and the U.S. Constitution in support of a few corporations and a fascist administration.

What does that make them?: Appeasers, at best.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. A promise not to have certain unexpected scandals pop up in the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Russ is right, as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Russ is seldom right.
Correct, yes.
Left, yes.
Seldom right, and never far right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think we need to give Sen Obama a few more days to find the time
to listen to Feingold before some give up on him completely because the fact of the matter is, Feingold is right and anything less is capitulation....there is nothing here to deal with....no deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. A "few more days"? read this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Feingold is against it and will vote against it, pelosi voted for it? How can he stand with both?
What I mean is I wait to see what his vote is since the article somehow contradicts itself in that respect..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Yet again, some media fuckhead portrays this as a "left" hobbyhorse.
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 01:44 AM by Leopolds Ghost
Note the weasel words: "walk a fine line between being weak on foriegn policy";
"claims the new law provides insuffcient court review of pending lawsuits"
which would be automatically thrown out by the law, which establishes that the
word of a Presidential aide is enough to indemnify someone of a crime such as
breaking and entering. Also note that Arlen Specter continues to be strongly opposed:

In so doing, Obama sought to walk the fine political line between GOP accusations that he is weak on foreign policy -- Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) called passing the legislation a "vital national security matter" -- and alienating his base.

"Given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as president, I will carefully monitor the program," Obama said in a statement hours after the House approved the legislation 293-129.

This marks something of a reversal of Obama's position from an earlier version of the bill, which was approved by the Senate Feb. 12, when Obama was locked in a fight for the Democratic nomination with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.).

Obama missed the February vote on that FISA bill as he campaigned in the "Potomac Primaries," but issued a statement that day declaring "I am proud to stand with Senator Dodd, Senator Feingold and a grassroots movement of Americans who are refusing to let President Bush put protections for special interests ahead of our security and our liberty."

Sens. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) continue to oppose the new legislation, as does Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.). All Obama backers in the primary, those senior lawmakers contend that the new version of the FISA law -- crafted after four months of intense negotiations between White House aides and congressional leaders -- provides insufficient court review of the pending 40 lawsuits against the telecommunications companies alleging privacy invasion for their participation in a warrantless wiretapping program after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

"The immunity outcome is predetermined," Feingold wrote in a memo today.

Obama came down on the side of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who argued that a provision in the new law reaffirmed that FISA, and that act's courts, gives the final say over government spying. President Bush has argued that a war-time chief executive has powers that trump FISA.

"It restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance -- making it clear that the President cannot circumvent the law," Obama said today.

Sen. Arlen Specter (Pa.), the most prominent Republican opponent of the compromise bill, issued a statement today calling that exclusivity provision "meaningless because that specific provision is now in 1978 act." Specter said Bush just ignored existing law in starting the warrantless surveillance program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. I was thinking how difficult it must be to work with such bone heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. No damn deal! Slam it shut!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sent to Gabrielle Giffords today after pleading with her yesterday...
Edited on Sat Jun-21-08 12:23 AM by BushDespiser12
Thank you for choosing not to defend the 4th amendment with your Aye vote regarding H.R. 6304. What a travesty. Your capitulation is deeply dis-heartening. My vote for you as a Democrat has been cast in vain.

Is there not an oath that you are sworn to iterating your defense of the Constitution? I would love to hear your justification to cast aside liberty and freedom to achieve... what exactly? Security? Protect the corporate individual in lieu of a natural citizen's rights?

This is an incredibly sad day for Democracy, and for the people of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. Who is the courageous 1 Rep vote?
We should praise him/her.

I just thanked Waxman, since he is my c-man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's what I wanted to know too.
Curious where they're from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Probably Patrick Leahy.
He's been steadily against warrantless spying on American's.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Leahy ain't a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. WTF?
Patrick Leahy is a repub? :wtf:

Have more coffee! :donut:

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. It was Timothy Johnson of Illinois
H.R. 6304: To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure... (Vote On Passage)
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-437
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Obama had better carefully read what Feingold said today.
He can either vote like a Chicago pol and count himself among friends or vote like a new breed of politician that upholds the constitution. The world will be watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. Russ for VP!
K&R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
21. The year was 2005
Russ Feingold stood alone on the Senate floor and called for the censure of Bush. Where were his Democratic friends when he needed them? They were all running for the doors so they wouldnt be seen with him. Maybe Bush would be gone by now if they would have followed his lead, but no they were too cowardly to back him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. U.S. Senator Russ Feingold for VP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I :loveya: Russ !!

:kick: & Recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. And Obama has no opinion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. Russ IS our Senate Majority Leader!
And once we get the Blue Dogs OUT OF TOWN, he can help the Democrats TRULY be represented again when we get Reid the hell out of there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC