Democrats Have Legalized Bush's War Crimes-By Robert Parry

[kpete]

Democrats Have Legalized Bush's War Crimes

By Robert Parry, Media Consortium. Posted June 21, 2008.


The Democratic leadership cleared the way for the president and his collaborators to evade punishment for defying the law.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claims that a key positive feature of the new wiretap "compromise" is that the bill reaffirms that the President must follow the law, even though the same bill virtually assures that no one will be held accountable for George W. Bush's violation of the earlier spying law.

In other words, in the guise of rejecting Bush's theories of an all-powerful presidency that is above the law, the Democratic leadership cleared the way for the President and his collaborators to evade punishment for defying the law.

So, why should anyone assume that the new legislative edict demanding that the President obey the law will get any more respect than the old one, which established the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 as the "exclusive" means for authorizing electronic spying?

It wasn't that Bush and his team didn't understand the old law's language; they simply believed they could violate the law without consequence, under the radical theory that at a time of war -- even one as vaguely defined as the "war on terror" -- the President's powers trump all laws as well as the constitutional rights of citizens.

Essentially, Bush was betting that even if his warrantless wiretap program was disclosed -- as it was in December 2005 -- that he could trust his Republican congressional allies to protect him and could count on most Democrats not to have the guts to challenge him.

His bet proved to be a smart one. After the New York Times revealed the warrantless wiretaps two and a half years ago, Congress took no steps to hold Bush accountable. Before the 2006 elections, Pelosi declared that Bush's impeachment was "off the table."

...............

more at:
http://www.alternet.org/rights/88950

[Uncle Joe]

1. Bullshit, this capitulation says, that Bush or any future administration

doesn't have to follow the law. The law will be altered when they break it to protect the guilty.

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claims that a key positive feature of the new wiretap "compromise" is that the bill reaffirms that the President must follow the law,even though the same bill virtually assures that no one will be held accountable for George W. Bush's violation of the earlier spying law. Share this article"

[pretzel4gore]

2. let's pretend we aint pretending!

the core is fulla tapeworms, but the apple still taste..okay, just try not to re-puke with every bite

[Solly Mack]

3. to quote MLK, Jr. for the ump·teen time

Martin Luther King, Jr. asks us to "Remember"


"We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was "legal"...
Martin Luther King, Jr.

and it was...and what this means is that atrocities and abuses can and will be committed under the cover of law. (slavery, Jim Crow..torture...violations of the Constitution, etc..)

That is the why of recourse (impeachment, criminal charges)...and when recourse is off the table then complicity takes hold.