Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Consumer Confidence Falls to a 16-Year Low on Fuel Prices, Housing Woes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:01 AM
Original message
Consumer Confidence Falls to a 16-Year Low on Fuel Prices, Housing Woes
from Bloomberg:



U.S. Consumer Confidence Fell More Than Forecast (Update1)

By Timothy R. Homan

June 24 (Bloomberg) -- Consumer confidence fell more than forecast this month to the lowest level in more than 16 years, raising the risk that Americans will retrench after spending their tax rebates.

The Conference Board's confidence index fell to 50.4, the lowest level since February 1992, from a revised 58.1 in May. Consumers were the most pessimistic about the future in the 41- year history of the index. A separate report today showed home prices in April dropped the most since at least 2001.

Falling property values, rising unemployment and higher food and fuel bills have shaken consumers and may cause purchases to slump once the rebate money is gone. While price increases signal the Federal Reserve may raise borrowing costs later this year, policy makers are forecast to hold the target rate unchanged tomorrow as concern over growth lingers.

``The confidence reading is grim,'' said Joshua Shapiro, chief U.S. economist at Maria Fiorini Ramirez Inc. in New York. ``Sure we'll get a bump up from the tax rebates, but once that is over, we're facing what is increasingly looking like an air pocket for consumers.''

Economists forecast the confidence report from the Conference Board, a private New York-based research group, would fall to 56, according to the median of 69 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. Estimates ranged from ranged from 50 to 60. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aersfm0XlvLg&refer=home



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. They Probably Had to Bugger the Numbers to Keep it From Falling Below 50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC