Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi Says More Debate on FISA Would Be ‘Healthy’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:26 AM
Original message
Pelosi Says More Debate on FISA Would Be ‘Healthy’

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/06/24/pelosi-says-more-debate-on-fisa-would-be-healthy/

It would be “healthy” if the Senate spends more time debating an overhaul of domestic-spying laws now moving through Congress, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday.

The House passed the legislation last week, despite misgivings and outright opposition from many Democrats. Pelosi voted for the bill, saying legislation was urgently needed to update federal authority to collect intelligence information. But she said the provision granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that aided the government surveillance program is “a cause for great anger” among the American people.

“It would be healthy if (the public) heard more about it… even if the resolution is the same,” Pelosi said, when asked by reporters whether she thinks Senate Democrats, including Sen. Barack Obama, should filibuster the legislation updating the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act as it heads to the Senate floor this week.

Obama has said he would support the legislation and supports eliminating the immunity provision. Sen. Chris Dodd is expected to offer an amendment stripping out the provision during Senate debate, but the Senate has rejected similar efforts multiple times in the past.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. then why didn't you debate it more BEFORE you voted for it, nancy??????
talk is cheap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Let the public hear more about it" is political speak for, "run a propaganda campaign".
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 10:31 AM by Marr
It does not mean public debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sure it will...how can it not be healthy in such a healthy democracy as America's?
and goodness knows, the US government is just humming along beautifully and as intended. 4 squared-healthy and then some!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. more of nancy's spackling over the bullet holes, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. a cause of great anger for the American people??
you stupid bitch you want to know why Nancy, it's that piece of paper that means so much to us than to you the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC