spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 11:53 AM
Original message |
why isn't CSPAN showing the oil speculation dog and pony show? |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 11:54 AM by spanone
watching on www.cnn.com Live
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message |
1. oh this is such BS, are they still pushing drilling in the oceans. |
|
and ANWR, not watching at the moment.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. it's a farce. senators can say 'we held hearings' and they did....farce |
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Late nite/early am they showed house commerce subcommittee hearing, essentially confirming that govt NOW has authority to end much if not all of this bs.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. senate is holding hearings on oil speculators...now |
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
don't know if I wanna watch. House committee was good 'cause relatively honest.
|
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-24-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
6. On CNN "Issue #1" a viewer asked about the millions of acres |
|
of leases the oil companies already own, and why they are not drilling in THEM instead of demanding more leases. I was a bit surprised to hear that the reason they are NOT is because it's very expensive to drill in those areas, so they are holding off in hopes that Congress will approve of other leases either on land (like Alaska) or offshore but closer to land than the ones they currently own. I don't know if that's true or not, but it's the first time I've heard that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message |