Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dodd, Feingold, Wyden and Boxer to Oppose Cloture on FISA Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:16 PM
Original message
Dodd, Feingold, Wyden and Boxer to Oppose Cloture on FISA Bill
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 04:22 PM by kpete
Dodd, Feingold, Wyden and Boxer to Oppose Cloture on FISA Bill
by mcjoan
Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 02:00:21 PM PDT

Chris Dodd and Russ Feingold released this statement (via e-mail):

"This is a deeply flawed bill, which does nothing more than offer retroactive immunity by another name. We strongly urge our colleagues to reject this so-called ‘compromise’ legislation and oppose any efforts to consider this bill in its current form. We will oppose efforts to end debate on this bill as long as it provides retroactive immunity for the telecommunications companies that may have participated in the President’s warrantless wiretapping program, and as long as it fails to protect the privacy of law-abiding Americans.

"If the Senate does proceed to this legislation, our immediate response will be to offer an amendment that strips the retroactive immunity provision out of the bill. We hope our colleagues will join us in supporting Americans’ civil liberties by opposing retroactive immunity and rejecting this so-called ‘compromise’ legislation."

Sen. Ron Wyden announced that he will oppose cloture for wiretapping bill:

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), a senior member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, announced today that he would oppose new legislation amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) due to his continued opposition to a provision that would grant blanket retroactive immunity to any telecommunications company that participated in the President’s warrantless wiretapping program.

"This is not the first time that the President has pressured Congress into interfering in federal court cases to cover-up his attempts to secretly rewrite the law. Congress’s previous attempts to bail-out the President—from the Detainee Treatment Act to the Military Commissions Act—have not only failed to solve the legal mess, but have often provided cover for the Administration’s failed counterterrorism policies," said Wyden.

"I see no reason for Congress to grant blanket immunity to companies that went along with the President’s wiretapping program for the better part of six years, even as it became increasingly clear that the legal foundation for this program was built on sand," Wyden continued. "It is not the role of Congress to substitute its judgment for the judgment of the courts. And while this bill offers the illusion of a fair judicial process, in reality, as the House Republican Leadership has noted, this is a mere ‘formality.’" ...

Here's a portion of Sen. Boxer's floor statement:

I know that many of my colleagues in the Senate think we know enough about this program.

But we do not know enough. The Bush Administration trampled on the Constitution, and we are not doing anything in this bill to provide accountability.

This bill goes along with the premise that we hold up the Constitution when it suits us, and we set it aside when it hinders what we want to do.

Simply put, this bill is a fig leaf that attempts to hide the truth about the warrantless surveillance program at the expense of the rights of our citizens.

And if we vote for it today, we are perpetuating a cover-up.

I want to be clear – I support giving our government every tool necessary to track down terrorists and protect our citizens.

I voted to go after al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden, and I believe it is the responsibility of the Congress to provide all of the tools necessary to fight terrorism and protect the American people.

But we have another responsibility, I believe, of equal importance; and that is our responsibility to uphold the Constitution and the rights of our citizens....

We can and must do better, and therefore I oppose this bill.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/24/143245/164/812/541267
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The bill should not pass at all. With immunity or without it
It is a bad bill, Senator Boxer has it right. No to the whole bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I Know Obama Is In A Bad Place On This - If He Opposes This FISA Bill.....
he looks like he is soft on National Security and the Repugs and the talking right will crucify him. If he supports it - we on the other hand will dump on him.

Seems to me he has to offer a tough alternative that can be a compromise - without the immunity clause in it. If he pulls that off he basically lives what he's been talking about. He proves he's a statesman that can reach a compromise that will benefit everyone. The only one's that it would hurt would be *Co and the telecoms - but then they deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Given the choices, better to piss us off
Seeing as how we'll still vote for him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. I don't know if I will....
I may just not vote at all if whatever president we would have makes it clear by their actions in the senate that they have no regard for my constitutional rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. There are things I care about more than privacy rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. there is nothing i value more than the constitution..not a damn thing! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Well good for you. I care more about feeding poor people.
Than I do about privacy concerns related to the 4th amendment.

Which is not to say that I don't care about those concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. what could you possibly care about if not your rights?????
lets see Obama backtracked on Fisa..last week on campaign finance..then Nafta..what could you possibly care about????????

He is back tracking on taking the troops out..so please do clearify what is inmportant to you , what are your core principles????? do you have any????????

This guy said he would filibuster the Fisa bill in January..so come on, tell us all what your core values are???????

this makes me puke!

and people like you who care so little about what generations have fought for and shed their blood for..you make me sick!

I assure you it will just be a matter of time before what you care for,or about, he will shit on also and it will be something that directly effects you! Mind you , I am not being judgemental or cynical here.it is fact..he is making it a habit of not keeping his word.

I don't know about you, but i don't put my hand over a flame and get burned and then put my hand there again and expect not to get burned.

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Spare me your self-righteous indignation.
I care about privacy rights. There are just things that I care more about.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. TELL ME ALL ABOUT IT WHEN THEY COME KNOCKING ON YOUR DOOR..
or busting in your door..

i had just that happen to me when i helped a dying man in my home who used to post here!

tell me all about it!!

grow up..the next door that gets busted in might be your own!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. There are many bad things that can happen to us. That would be one of them.
I care about privacy rights. There are just some things I care more about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. and what are those things?????? if it is about poor people..
you are barking up the wrong tree with Obama..just get hold of Obama's constitutants..and ask them how it felt to have their power cut off in the Chicago winters while he slept well down the street.

oh and ensuring he was going to make things right and the only case he ever did was Tony Rezko the man who froze the poor and left them in squalor.

get real!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. This is the guy who reset the national conversation on race. And yet...
he can't manage to take a stand against the most unpopular president in history during his lame duck year? How does that make sense?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. How do we benefit if the 4th Amendment is compromised?
A couple days ago another poster made this statement on a thread about FISA and it should become our battle cry "The Constitution is not negotiable."

Obama, just like every other member of Congress, has taken an oath to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution. If he won't keep his oath as a Senator, how can we trust him to be president? He doesn't have the nomination yet and, if he caves on this, let's hope the delegates to the Convention desert him and find a Democrat with a spine to run as our candidate. I don't think he should take our votes for granted if he starts coming off as just another politician even his most loyal supporters may give up.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. How much softer on terrorism can you get than wanting to pull out of Iraq?
This is so Hussein Osama's, er um, Obama's Compatriots in Al Qaida can regroup and attack us again. :eyes: The Re:puke:'s have a much bigger club to bash him with on that front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R -- Thanks!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey -- wait -- was this discussed on the floor today?? Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Senators Boxer and Fiengold believe that to pass this bill
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 04:46 PM by midnight
is to cover up broken laws. Don't pass it.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Actually, this bill is simply legislating obstruction of justice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. You damned right I'm sure I want to...
Recommend!

The house is STILL a SWAMP full of scum sucking boot lickers and Nancy and Stenny are as bad as Fat Hastert!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deja DU: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution?
Deja DU: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution?
Nov-09-07 - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2245762

I was told years ago that ALL fiber optic communication traffic was routed overseas so that "everything" was moved outside the protections of the law and Constitution and ANYTHING could be monitored. I thought the idea quite fantastic even though it came from a very reliable source that would know exactly such things. Then, the story of the fiber optic splitters hit my radar. I now see now how easily exactly that, routing ALL COMMUNICATIONS overseas, was accomplished.

Is that Bush's and the Telecom's HUGE crime hidden and covered-up behind this story?

If the telecoms get immunity, will it aid in covering up Bush's crime.
ABSOLUTELY! That is why it is so important to the Rs! Support = obstruction of justice.

Have we arrived at the point in the history of the Bushco junta where
laws passed and people nominated are part of crimes of obstructing justice?

===================
AT&T Whistleblower: Telecom Immunity Is A Cover-Up
By Spencer Ackerman - Nov 7, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004662.php


Earlier today we flagged that Mark Klein, who uncovered a secret surveillance room run by the NSA while employed as a San Francisco-based technician for AT&T, is in Washington to lobby against granting retroactive legal immunity to telecommunications companies. In an interview this afternoon, Klein explained why he traveled all the way from San Francisco to lobby Senators about the issue: if the immunity provision passes, Americans may never know how extensive the surveillance program was -- or how deeply their privacy may have been invaded.

"The president has not presented this truthfully," said Klein, a 62-year old retiree. "He said it was about a few people making calls to the Mideast. But I know this physical equipment. It copies everything. There's no selection of anything, at all -- the splitter copies entire data streams from the internet, phone conversations, e-mail, web-browsing. Everything."

What Klein unearthed -- you can read it here -- points to a nearly unbounded surveillance program. Its very location in San Francisco suggests that the program was "massively domestic" in its focus, he said. "If they really meant what they say about only wanting international stuff, you wouldn't want it in San Francisco or Atlanta. You'd want to be closer to the border where the lines come in from the ocean so you pick up international calls. You only do it in San Francisco if you want domestic stuff. The location of this stuff contradicts their story .....

=======================
NSA Monitors All Web Traffic, Says Ex-AT&T Employee

NSA Monitors All Web Traffic, Says Ex-AT&T Employee
Tom Corelis (Blog) - Nov 10, 2007
http://www.dailytech.com/NSA+Monitors+All+Web+Traffic+Says+ExATT+Employee/article9620.htm


Felt "forced to the connect the Big Brother Machine" if he wanted to keep his job

Mark Klein, the former AT&T technician and whistleblower who helped kick off the AT&T/NSA eavesdropping scandal, clarified further details regarding what he witnessed while connecting a secret NSA eavesdropping facility: secure room 641A in AT&T’s San Francisco switching center, presumably commissioned by the NSA, received copies of all the traffic its splitters were connected to, including both international and domestic e-mails, web traffic, and phone calls, both from AT&T’s customers as well as other providers.

Previous statements by the government, AT&T and President Bush indicated that the only affected communications are communications relevant to national security, like those of suspected terrorists and suspicious foreign nationals. According to Klein, however, the technology used to connect the secure room was far more democratic, consisting of simple, dumb splitters incapable of any kind of contextual filtering: essentially, room 641A received “a duplicate of every fiber-optic signal routed through facilities.”

Klein, appearing on MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann show, told viewers about his personal association with secure room 641A. “When I was a technician, I had the engineering/wiring documents, which told me how the splitter was wired to the secret room … I had to know in order to do my job,” he said, “so I know that whatever went across those cables was copied; the entire datastream was copied into the secret room.”

Referring to the equipment itself, Klein states, “the splitter device has no selective capability, it just copies everything. .............

=======================
Interview: AT&T Whistleblower Mark Klein on Bush's Illegal Surveillance and Retroactive Immunity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0dJJhLueEg

=======================
NSA Pressured LA Times To Kill Domestic Spying Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOI1VGKcgGY

=======================
November 5th, 2007
AT&T Whistleblower to Urge Senate to Reject Blanket Immunity for Telecoms
Press Conference on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, November 7
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2007/11/05

Washington, D.C. - On Wednesday, November 7, at 10:30am, telecommunications technician and AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein will speak out at a press conference on Capitol Hill, explaining why he is asking lawmakers to reject immunity for telecoms who assisted the Bush administration's spying on millions of Americans.

Klein witnessed first-hand the technology AT&T built to assist the government's domestic warrantless wiretapping program at AT&T's main switching facility in San Francisco. As part of his job at AT&T, Klein connected high-speed fiber optic cables to sophisticated equipment that intercepted communications from AT&T customers and then copied and routed every single one to a room controlled by the National Security Agency (NSA). Klein has provided evidence for the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF's) class-action lawsuit against AT&T for its role in the illegal spying.

"My job required me to enable the physical connections between AT&T customers' Internet communications and the NSA's illegal, wholesale copying machine for domestic emails, Internet phone conversations, web surfing and all other Internet traffic. I have first-hand knowledge of the clandestine collaboration between one giant telecommunications company, AT&T, and the National Security Agency to facilitate the most comprehensive illegal domestic spying program in history," said Klein.

Also speaking at the event Wednesday ...........

=======================
Judge Orders Telecommunications Companies to Preserve Evidence in Government Surveillance Cases
Ruling Advances EFF's Class-action Lawsuit Against AT&T
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2007/11/06


San Francisco - A federal judge today ruled on a preservation motion filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), ordering that telecommunications companies must preserve any evidence of collaborating with the government in illegal spying on ordinary Americans.

In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker ordered the telecommunications companies to halt any routine destruction of documents or to arrange for the preservation of accurate copies. On December 14, each party must provide the court with confirmation that the court's order has been carried out. The court order did not require the government or the carriers to reveal whether or not they had any relevant evidence.

The government and the carriers had opposed the preservation motion, claiming that the government's invocation of the state secrets privilege made it impossible to proceed with a preservation order. In litigation, parties are typically required to preserve all relevant evidence.

For the judge's order:
http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/393%20order.pdf

For more on the class-action lawsuit against AT&T:
http://www.eff.org/cases/att

===== MORE ======
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. Thank you for those reminders of past discussions.
I think Boxer's statement, "This bill goes along with the premise that we hold up the Constitution when it suits us, and we set it aside when it hinders what we want to do", is right on the money.

For a few in the U.S., those with money and stockholdings in the telecom corps, this bill is a godsend. For the rest of us, since we have so little, the protections we were offered in our founding documents at least gave us the hope of a level playing field in our daily grinds. But, that level playing field is not so, and most people as they get older realize the lying games that have been played.

It must be nice to be in a position to declare war for "preemptive" purposes instead of self-defense, and simultaneously to retroactively change laws, that others did follow at the time, but which were not followed by our criminals in charge. If one was a criminal, wouldn't such preemptive and retroactive actions be a smoking gun of guilt?

I have no doubts that this game has been played in much less serious things than war and constitutional trespass. The game our rulers have told us we must play by is the very game that some in high places refuse to play. Do what we say, not what we do. For how many years is what I want to know: 10, 100, 1000, 6000, or more?

What a sick, deceptive world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. good for them....immunity is wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just wrote Sherrod Brown, asking him to join them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyra Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. Boxers statement:
But we have another responsibility, I believe, of equal importance; and that is our responsibility to uphold the Constitution and the rights of our citizens....

Of EQUAL importance?? Equal?? Ahh as I recall your oath is to protect the constitution not protect Americans from scary villains. How has "fight terrorism and protect the American people" become EQUAL to protecting the CONSTITUTION??

Cowards...all motherfucking COWARDS! They wont stop this from going through. Watch and be amazed as the spineless fascists bow down to their Gods the republicans once again. Dont get your hopes up folks...it only hurts more once they let you down...and they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Ah, darn, you said it first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dccrossman Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're Senators. If they really want to stop it, they'll put a hold on it
Repubs have been using this tactic. What's to stop Reid, or any of the others, if they really want to kill it, from putting a hold on the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. A Republican would have to place the hold, otherwise Reid wouldn't acknowledge it.
Edited on Wed Jun-25-08 11:17 PM by ToeBot
At least that's the only way it's worked in the past. I wonder why that is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. That's good to hear.
I'll drop a note to Wyden to thank him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. And that's it? No one else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. is this going to be discussed on the floor today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
21. Thank you (again) Ron Wyden (who really is a) D-Oregon!! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maineman Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. Hang in there, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. I have one great senator
Barbara Boxer. Now if I could have two of her......

And here comes steroid boy to go after her in '10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. good, let's hope it's infectious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. Thank you, Senator Wyden.
Once in a while he lets me down, but overall I couldn't be prouder of my Senator. :thumbsup:

Mr. "Constitutional Lawyer" Obama has missed a great opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pollo poco Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. This Oregonian agrees with you-go Wyden! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
32. Error: You've already recommended that thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
38. I love that Lady... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
41. Wyden Is MY Senator
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC