Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone watching C Span2?? Dodd on the Floor talking about FISA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:40 PM
Original message
Anyone watching C Span2?? Dodd on the Floor talking about FISA
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 08:11 PM by alyce douglas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Going to it now -- thanks!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. OOPS - wrong place.nt
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 07:46 PM by gateley
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. it is disgusting, look how low we have gotten
due to this ignorant and arrogant regime we have, and they do not care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. This disturbs me --
it's reminiscent of when he filibustered in February. He was practically the only person there.

He seems to be talking about torture now -- ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. that's how it's done unfortunately....it's going into the congressional record
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Yes - another DUer was kind enough to enlighten me on this.
Boy, I'm in awe of Dodd. When he said he's doing it so one day his children and grandchildren will know he stood up and fought for our constitution and rights... gave me chills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope someone else gets up and defends the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. and Pelosi is asking for more debate and passes off to the Senate
she can go to hell too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. thanks watching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Dodd is bringing up everything about torture and rendition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. kicking this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. lemme help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. dodd is giving a great speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. kicking this again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. I need your help in understanding something.

Did this come up for a vote on the floor today?

I'm thinking it must have, otherwise Dodd wouldn't be filibustering, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. don't really know? it wasn't reported on any news reports i've seen
it may have come up this evening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Usually there are threads following the hearings on DU --
Is my supposition correct, that one doesn't filibuster until a bill comes up for a vote?

I'm also wondering about the statements I read today (here) from Boxer and Feingold -- those were earlier.

It's hard to believe this is actually underway practically unnoticed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. this might help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Thanks, never forget that they also asked for Executive immunity
OT...

Comcast dropped cspan 2 for me a few weeks ago, surely I'm not alone, so even if some people would have watched the Senate, they need to have a digital box for each TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
16.  stream it...here's a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thank you and I am, just making a note of how people will
be less informed

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. very true...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. these Senators will ignore Dodd too.
giving a good case. He is angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He was pretty angry back in February as well, I hope they do
not just make this about immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. ill bet it's a party line vote...thugs will do NOTHING to reign in big business and their donations
big money in them there telecoms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. big money is right.
slimy sleazy criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. I love his passion. He is a great orator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
25. He's absolutely nailing everything that is wrong with this bill.
The Judiciary, not the Executive, should be allowed to determine whether the President has exceeded his powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. Dodd has the charts up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. Where the hell is everybody??
That room should be filled with Democratic Senators showing support for him.

I'm getting angry with all of them who aren't there, regardless of what their "statements" said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. probably have their hands over their ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. Qwest did not comply, Nacchio came from AT&T, maybe he
knew the rules

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
31. we have got to get on the phones tomorrow and tell these
Senators that we are ANGRY!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. We need to target the Dems who want to vote for this and some Republicans!
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 08:39 PM by Tatiana
Baucus (D-MT)
Casey (D-PA)
Collins (R-ME) - up for reelection; polling shows the Dem candidate closing in on her; might get Chaffee'd
Feinstein (D-CA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Hagel (R-NE) - retiring; he can afford to vote his conscience
Landrieu (D-LA) - up for reelection
McCaskill (D-MO) - not up for reelection; can support filibuster without losing much political capital in her conservative state
Mikulski (D-MD)
Specter (R-PA)
Sununu (R-NH) - up for reelection; trailing Dem badly
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. oh oh, Whitehouse that's my Senator what the hell is wrong with him?
oh boy, he's going to get a call tomorrow. Dodd is pissed/angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. God, I don't know. He knows the law and Constitution.
There isn't any excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
35. Dodd is getting fired up, now!
Letting a political judgment replace a legal judgment is a grave mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. don't you wish we could plead our case on that floor.
Dodd is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Nice but this speech is stll mostly about the immunity provision,
maybe Feingold will take up the rest of the bill.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. No, he is talking about the President not being above the law.
He wants the courts to decide, not the executive branch.

He is emphasizing the co-equal branches of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Yes, but what about the rest of the bill that will let the next
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 08:56 PM by slipslidingaway
President wiretap without the needed protections???

In edit, he is moving in that direction now.


http://balkin.blogspot.com/2008/06/why-obama-kinda-likes-fisa-bill-but-he.html

"...Most Americans don't realize that the FISA compromise comes in two parts. The first part greatly alters FISA by expanding the executive's ability to wiretap and engage in much broader searches of communications than were permissible under the law before. It essentially gives congressional blessing to some but not all of what the executive was doing under President Bush...

Part II, by contrast, is the part that everyone has gotten up in arms about. It creates effective immunity for telecom companies. It makes perfect sense for Obama to criticize this part of the bill. That's because he doesn't need it as much as he needs the first part, and his base really really dislikes it..."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thanks, watching. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
37. dodd is thru his notes, now he's ranting, this should get good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. dodd is presenting a good case.
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 08:48 PM by alyce douglas
the RULE OF LAW. I wish Teddy was there, he would be good too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. 67 senators voted to keep immunity in the bill back in February...
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00015

NAYs ---67
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Carper (D-DE)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Wicker (R-MS)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. oh crap, I hope these Senators realize what the hell they are doing
and how many read the Bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. This was the February vote on the amendment to strip immunity,
they had plenty of time to read that bill.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
45. "The idea that the Constitution does not get suspended for vengeance"
GO CHRIS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. hear that DICK CHENEY!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
48. You guys -- read this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. "Mr. Bush is demanding even more power to spy."
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 08:57 PM by kiva
Not President Bush--I'm in love, Senator Dodd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
53. Obama needs to make a BIG speech on this bill, it will then
be covered in the nightly news, in print and could turn the tide.

Although Obama has said he will vote for the bill regardless of the immunity provision.

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
54. Deja DU: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution?
Deja DU: Are ALL COMMUNICATIONS routed overseas to circumvent US law and the Constitution?
Nov-09-07 - http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2245762

I was told years ago that ALL fiber optic communication traffic was routed overseas so that "everything" was moved outside the protections of the law and Constitution and ANYTHING could be monitored. I thought the idea quite fantastic even though it came from a very reliable source that would know exactly such things. Then, the story of the fiber optic splitters hit my radar. I now see now how easily exactly that, routing ALL COMMUNICATIONS overseas, was accomplished.

Is that Bush's and the Telecom's HUGE crime hidden and covered-up behind this story?

If the telecoms get immunity, will it aid in covering up Bush's crime.
ABSOLUTELY! That is why it is so important to the Rs! Support = obstruction of justice.

Have we arrived at the point in the history of the Bushco junta where
laws passed and people nominated are part of crimes of obstructing justice?

===================
AT&T Whistleblower: Telecom Immunity Is A Cover-Up
By Spencer Ackerman - Nov 7, 2007
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/004662.php


Earlier today we flagged that Mark Klein, who uncovered a secret surveillance room run by the NSA while employed as a San Francisco-based technician for AT&T, is in Washington to lobby against granting retroactive legal immunity to telecommunications companies. In an interview this afternoon, Klein explained why he traveled all the way from San Francisco to lobby Senators about the issue: if the immunity provision passes, Americans may never know how extensive the surveillance program was -- or how deeply their privacy may have been invaded.

"The president has not presented this truthfully," said Klein, a 62-year old retiree. "He said it was about a few people making calls to the Mideast. But I know this physical equipment. It copies everything. There's no selection of anything, at all -- the splitter copies entire data streams from the internet, phone conversations, e-mail, web-browsing. Everything."

What Klein unearthed -- you can read it here -- points to a nearly unbounded surveillance program. Its very location in San Francisco suggests that the program was "massively domestic" in its focus, he said. "If they really meant what they say about only wanting international stuff, you wouldn't want it in San Francisco or Atlanta. You'd want to be closer to the border where the lines come in from the ocean so you pick up international calls. You only do it in San Francisco if you want domestic stuff. The location of this stuff contradicts their story .....

=======================
NSA Monitors All Web Traffic, Says Ex-AT&T Employee

NSA Monitors All Web Traffic, Says Ex-AT&T Employee
Tom Corelis (Blog) - Nov 10, 2007
http://www.dailytech.com/NSA+Monitors+All+Web+Traffic+Says+ExATT+Employee/article9620.htm


Felt "forced to the connect the Big Brother Machine" if he wanted to keep his job

Mark Klein, the former AT&T technician and whistleblower who helped kick off the AT&T/NSA eavesdropping scandal, clarified further details regarding what he witnessed while connecting a secret NSA eavesdropping facility: secure room 641A in AT&T’s San Francisco switching center, presumably commissioned by the NSA, received copies of all the traffic its splitters were connected to, including both international and domestic e-mails, web traffic, and phone calls, both from AT&T’s customers as well as other providers.

Previous statements by the government, AT&T and President Bush indicated that the only affected communications are communications relevant to national security, like those of suspected terrorists and suspicious foreign nationals. According to Klein, however, the technology used to connect the secure room was far more democratic, consisting of simple, dumb splitters incapable of any kind of contextual filtering: essentially, room 641A received “a duplicate of every fiber-optic signal routed through facilities.”

Klein, appearing on MSNBC’s Countdown with Keith Olbermann show, told viewers about his personal association with secure room 641A. “When I was a technician, I had the engineering/wiring documents, which told me how the splitter was wired to the secret room … I had to know in order to do my job,” he said, “so I know that whatever went across those cables was copied; the entire datastream was copied into the secret room.”

Referring to the equipment itself, Klein states, “the splitter device has no selective capability, it just copies everything. .............

=======================
Interview: AT&T Whistleblower Mark Klein on Bush's Illegal Surveillance and Retroactive Immunity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0dJJhLueEg

=======================
NSA Pressured LA Times To Kill Domestic Spying Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOI1VGKcgGY

=======================
November 5th, 2007
AT&T Whistleblower to Urge Senate to Reject Blanket Immunity for Telecoms
Press Conference on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, November 7
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2007/11/05

Washington, D.C. - On Wednesday, November 7, at 10:30am, telecommunications technician and AT&T whistleblower Mark Klein will speak out at a press conference on Capitol Hill, explaining why he is asking lawmakers to reject immunity for telecoms who assisted the Bush administration's spying on millions of Americans.

Klein witnessed first-hand the technology AT&T built to assist the government's domestic warrantless wiretapping program at AT&T's main switching facility in San Francisco. As part of his job at AT&T, Klein connected high-speed fiber optic cables to sophisticated equipment that intercepted communications from AT&T customers and then copied and routed every single one to a room controlled by the National Security Agency (NSA). Klein has provided evidence for the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF's) class-action lawsuit against AT&T for its role in the illegal spying.

"My job required me to enable the physical connections between AT&T customers' Internet communications and the NSA's illegal, wholesale copying machine for domestic emails, Internet phone conversations, web surfing and all other Internet traffic. I have first-hand knowledge of the clandestine collaboration between one giant telecommunications company, AT&T, and the National Security Agency to facilitate the most comprehensive illegal domestic spying program in history," said Klein.

Also speaking at the event Wednesday ...........

=======================
Judge Orders Telecommunications Companies to Preserve Evidence in Government Surveillance Cases
Ruling Advances EFF's Class-action Lawsuit Against AT&T
http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2007/11/06


San Francisco - A federal judge today ruled on a preservation motion filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), ordering that telecommunications companies must preserve any evidence of collaborating with the government in illegal spying on ordinary Americans.

In his ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker ordered the telecommunications companies to halt any routine destruction of documents or to arrange for the preservation of accurate copies. On December 14, each party must provide the court with confirmation that the court's order has been carried out. The court order did not require the government or the carriers to reveal whether or not they had any relevant evidence.

The government and the carriers had opposed the preservation motion, claiming that the government's invocation of the state secrets privilege made it impossible to proceed with a preservation order. In litigation, parties are typically required to preserve all relevant evidence.

For the judge's order:
http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/393%20order.pdf

For more on the class-action lawsuit against AT&T:
http://www.eff.org/cases/att

===== MORE ======
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
55. Is the great quail shooter scowling from his usual perch? I hope he's hearing
every word and it's giving him a migrain headache.

I hope it raises his blood pressure and his entire head explodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. Says he's wrapping up...NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
57. "Gradual, silent encroachments..." on our civil liberties. Beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
58. just WoW
Senator Dodd thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:20 PM
Original message
Now it will be a new item, at least. Thanks, Chris!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
59. So adjourned until 9 a.m. to be continued!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
60. The Senate stands adjourned until 9:30 tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
61. Cloture vote tomorrow morning? Did I hear that right??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
62. thanks for the thread alyce douglas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
63. If Dodd and Feingold pull this off and prevent this bill coming to a vote
they'll be big, big heros in my book. They'll become the face of the particular Democratic Party that I want to see in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC