Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where do you fall on the line on the left?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:45 AM
Original message
Poll question: Where do you fall on the line on the left?
The line:

|
|
|
|
<---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------->toward fascism
|
|
|



We've pretty much taken the political compass test, but I'm looking to see where you believe you come from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Someone needs to anchor the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sorry - I had to vote for the Freeper "lost" choice...
That was too damn funny...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm a little less socialist than the Dalai Lama and a little less libertarian than the Dalai Lama...
...but I'm a whole lot more RATM than the Dalai Lama. ie Killin' in the Name of: Fuck You I won't do whatcha tell me. MotherFucker.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ykgh0SV_yCs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Left wing libertarianism, basically. That's basically what Gandhi and the Lama are.
Having said that, not all left wing libertarians are pacifists. There comes a point where one must decide for himself to pick up a gun for defense. The Anarchist militias in Spain during the Spanish Civil War were examples of people who mobilized to defend themselves against annihilation. Of course, in that civil war, Franco and the fascists eventually won and then executed everyone else who opposed them. It was a bloodbath.

Left wing libertarians aren't the same as members of the Libertarian Party. Those are right wing libertarians in general or anarcho-capitalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I see it as more like a circle than a line.
If the circle is a clock face, I'm probably at about 8:00 (a definite leftist but not quite ready to take up torch or a pitchfork). People who consider themselves centrists would be at 12:00, obviously. And, for those who bottom out at 6:00, it ceases to matter whether they're Conservatives or Liberals. They're just extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is there a meaningful left position in America?
If so, tell me where to sign up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think I have Socialist leanings
I like to share everything with everyone. I'd be a good Kibbutznic. I'd give up material possessions to live a philosophical ideal. I like the parts in the Bible where they say each according to his needs. Provide for everyone the basics. I hate greed and hording. I think its immature behavior. We are only as strong as our weakest link. We are only as strong as the hungry homeless couple living in a van by the river. That is the American dream at a weak link. We are only as strong as a prison inmate with hepatitis who gets no treatment because the medical services have been outsourced to a company who makes money by ignoring infectious disease. We are only as strong as a cancer victim with no insurance having to take out a 90 thousand dollar bank loan to get admission to a hospital. We are only as strong as dead migrant workers in the Arizona desert. We are only as strong as the hospital emergency room tuning away a woman in labor because she is not from this country. What ever. We are getting weaker by the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm probably most in agreement with free-market socialism. The basic blueprint is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy#An_alternative_model

There are much more detailed descriptions of Schweickart's model, but basically for the purposes of this thread, this is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. The 2-dimensional Politicl Compass makes soooo much sense.
Edited on Wed Jun-25-08 01:56 AM by pnorman
Dropping back to a 1-dimensional line is just plain ridiculous! WHY?

Here's what I mean: http://www.politicalcompass.org/

pnorman
On edit: Below is what I had scored on that Political Compass test, several years ago. I haven't bothered to take it again.

Economic Left/Right: -7.50
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -4.92
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. In my core I am a liberal, but I am becomming more and more a libertarian
California seperatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. WOO HOO FREESTATE!
hee hee cyberrun reference.
Im all for California leaving, adn taking any states that want to go with it.
We have been abused by the right coast WAY TOO FUCKING LONG!

Mind you if we DO go free state, then there will be a split between North N south.
Personally they can have south of SC.. or Monterey.. whichever is farther ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaltrucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Crashing through the far laft wall
As I say in my profile, "I'm probably farther left than most of y'all".

Che, Fidel, Lenin, Marx are my mentors.

:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. Frankly, I'm bothered by ideological extremes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm as far left as you can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. I believe in freedom of the individual
and kindness in society. I don't care for the extremes on either end.I don't see too many differences between the extreme right and the extreme left-it's like comparing Hitler with Stalin.

Lose-Lose.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. To be honest, I've never got that argument.
Sure, you can say that about Hitler and Stalin, but Hitler and Stalin are notoriously difficult to place reasonably on a two-dimensional political spectrum anyway. Was Hitler "extreme right" in appealing, and responding to, to the fears of free market capitalism on the part of the German middle class? Was Stalin "extreme left" when the factions he supported helped crush the social revolution in Spain in 1936?

Are Peter Kropotkin and, say, Ludwig von Mises so politically close?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. They were both authoritarian on methodology. You can compare Stalin to Gandhi.
They both advocated left wing economic positions, but one of them relied upon informing the people and letting them decide collectively what to do, while the other enacted change through force and terror. A person could be a full-blown socialist, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is automatically as bad as Stalin. Nevermind ultra-right wing capitalists like Augusto Pinochet.

With regards to the argument that far left wing positions are intrinsically bad, I'd only have to point to Noam Chomsky as an example of a far leftist who isn't an advocate of mass murder of the opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. I support:
:- A free-market economy, in which the rich are taxed a lot and the poor only a little.

:- Free-at-point-of-use health care paid for by general taxation

:- More spending on education than is currently the case in the UK, and less emphasis on teaching to the test.

:- Abortion available on demand in the first two trimesters, and in some but not all circumstances in the third.

:- Gay marriage (the pedant in me would prefer civil unions with identical legal status, but human dignity is more important than pedantry), with the proviso that the best way to get there may be via some years of civil unions.

:- The separation of Church and State; the disestablishment of the C of E; an end to the compulsory "daily act of collective worship of a broadly Christian nature".

:- Military intervention by first-world countries in other countries in those situations where it's in the interests of the country being invaded - I supported Kosovo and still do; I supported Afghanistan until I realised how badly it was being done (and still think that if done right, with a massively greater focus on nation-building, it would have been a good thing); I didn't support Iraq but only because there was no way to put a better regime in place after removing Saddam; I would have liked to have seen troops sent to Darfur.

:- A massive increase in aid to the third world.

:- A national DNA data-bank, if and when it can be done well - at present I don't think it can be, but in a decade or two I suspect it will be viable. It would be a negligable loss in liberty, for a large gain in security.

:- Not bringing in national ID cards - see above, with the words "negligable" and "large" reversed.

:- A reduction in the possible length of detention without trial.

:- UK-level gun control.

:- Shutting down Guantanamo Bay; trying the inmates in civilian courts; almost certainly reimprisoning most of them as a result, but releasing the - quite possibly large - minority there isn't sufficient evidence against.

:- Freedom to incite religious and racial hatred, provided it's not done to a captive audience (e.g. employees) - taking it away is the start of a very slippery slope.

:- The ban on cigarette advertising.

:- Vivisection for medical reasons.

:- Stem cell research

:- Taxes on pollutants.

:- Kyoto

:- Removal of all elected officials from the justice system. Those who make laws should be answerable to the will of the people; those who enforce them - judges, attorneys, the police, etc - should be answerable only to the law and one another. C.F. Nifong, Mike.

:- Electoral boundaries established by civil servants, not partisan politicians.

:- The legalisation of cannabis.

:- An end to agricultural subsidies in the first world - the harm this does to first-world agriculture will be outweighed by the benefits to third-world agriculture.

:- Easier legal immigration, an amnesty for most existing illegal immigrants, but a crackdown on future illegal immigrants (contingent on first making legal immigration easier): whatever level you believe immigration should be at, it's strongly in a country's interest that all that immigration be registered.




So where does that put me on the left-right line? I'd say that I'm

*Generic left-wing on economic issues,

*Far left on the whole web of religious/sexual/medical/social ethics issues

*Centre left or centrist on law and order

*"Eclectic" on foreign policy - at present the split seems to be between left wingers advocating altruistic isolationism and right-wingers advocating self-interested interventionism; I'm a nominal left-winger who wants altruistic interventionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Extreme left (using the American scale which is far to the right of the rest of the world)
except for the issues where I am pretty far right...

The problem with pigeon holes is that frequently the pigeons don't fit.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC