|
:- A free-market economy, in which the rich are taxed a lot and the poor only a little.
:- Free-at-point-of-use health care paid for by general taxation
:- More spending on education than is currently the case in the UK, and less emphasis on teaching to the test.
:- Abortion available on demand in the first two trimesters, and in some but not all circumstances in the third.
:- Gay marriage (the pedant in me would prefer civil unions with identical legal status, but human dignity is more important than pedantry), with the proviso that the best way to get there may be via some years of civil unions.
:- The separation of Church and State; the disestablishment of the C of E; an end to the compulsory "daily act of collective worship of a broadly Christian nature".
:- Military intervention by first-world countries in other countries in those situations where it's in the interests of the country being invaded - I supported Kosovo and still do; I supported Afghanistan until I realised how badly it was being done (and still think that if done right, with a massively greater focus on nation-building, it would have been a good thing); I didn't support Iraq but only because there was no way to put a better regime in place after removing Saddam; I would have liked to have seen troops sent to Darfur.
:- A massive increase in aid to the third world.
:- A national DNA data-bank, if and when it can be done well - at present I don't think it can be, but in a decade or two I suspect it will be viable. It would be a negligable loss in liberty, for a large gain in security.
:- Not bringing in national ID cards - see above, with the words "negligable" and "large" reversed.
:- A reduction in the possible length of detention without trial.
:- UK-level gun control.
:- Shutting down Guantanamo Bay; trying the inmates in civilian courts; almost certainly reimprisoning most of them as a result, but releasing the - quite possibly large - minority there isn't sufficient evidence against.
:- Freedom to incite religious and racial hatred, provided it's not done to a captive audience (e.g. employees) - taking it away is the start of a very slippery slope.
:- The ban on cigarette advertising.
:- Vivisection for medical reasons.
:- Stem cell research
:- Taxes on pollutants.
:- Kyoto
:- Removal of all elected officials from the justice system. Those who make laws should be answerable to the will of the people; those who enforce them - judges, attorneys, the police, etc - should be answerable only to the law and one another. C.F. Nifong, Mike.
:- Electoral boundaries established by civil servants, not partisan politicians.
:- The legalisation of cannabis.
:- An end to agricultural subsidies in the first world - the harm this does to first-world agriculture will be outweighed by the benefits to third-world agriculture.
:- Easier legal immigration, an amnesty for most existing illegal immigrants, but a crackdown on future illegal immigrants (contingent on first making legal immigration easier): whatever level you believe immigration should be at, it's strongly in a country's interest that all that immigration be registered.
So where does that put me on the left-right line? I'd say that I'm
*Generic left-wing on economic issues,
*Far left on the whole web of religious/sexual/medical/social ethics issues
*Centre left or centrist on law and order
*"Eclectic" on foreign policy - at present the split seems to be between left wingers advocating altruistic isolationism and right-wingers advocating self-interested interventionism; I'm a nominal left-winger who wants altruistic interventionism.
|