Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court bans death penalty for child rape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 09:58 AM
Original message
Supreme Court bans death penalty for child rape
Court bans death penalty for child rape
Posted June 25, 2008 10:50 AM
The Swamp

By James Oliphant



A divided Supreme Court Wednesday slammed the door on expanding the death penalty to cover violent crimes that do not result in the death of the victim, overturning a Louisiana law that permitted capital punishment for child rapists.

In the 5-4 decision written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court held that the law violated the Constitution's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

Allowing the execution of child rapists, Kennedy wrote, runs counter to "evolving standards of decency in a maturing society."

Kennedy said that the court and society has an interest in limiting the application of the death penalty, and noted that 44 states currently prohibit the execution of defendants who are convicted of crimes where a death did not occur.

The case involved Patrick Kennedy, who was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1998 rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter. The girl was badly injured in the assault and required surgery.

more...

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/06/court_bans_death_penalty_for_c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. For some cases, its too bad that they can't be put to death.
Edited on Wed Jun-25-08 10:00 AM by aikoaiko


eta: But I understand why people are against the death penalty in all cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Alito, Roberts, Scalia and Thomas dissented.
They are a menace to society of an entirely different kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. We need justices who are not blood thirsty
We need justices who look carefully and deliberately at any case where the state is taking the life of anyone - regardless of how a monster he is. Justices who are willing to err on the side of conviction. This, always, has been the basis of our penal code.

This rule barely passed, 5 to 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC