Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Tilts Toward Center, Irking Some Activists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:04 PM
Original message
Obama Tilts Toward Center, Irking Some Activists
Obama Tilts Toward Center, Irking Some Activists
Stances on Spy Bill
And Corporate Tax
Buck Liberal Base
By SUSAN DAVIS
June 24, 2008; Page A8

Barack Obama's support of an overhaul of domestic-spying laws last week was the latest in a string of statements suggesting the Democratic presidential candidate is tacking toward the center to compete with John McCain.

On foreign policy, national security, tax issues and even local politics, Sen. Obama has made some decisions lately that belie his ranking by the nonpartisan National Journal as the U.S.'s "most liberal" senator.


During the primaries, he ran to the left of Sen. Hillary Clinton, securing the nomination in part by shoring up a base that included self-identified liberals and Internet activists who helped fill his campaign war chest.

Some of those supporters are irked by Sen. Obama's latest moves, but the general-election season will put increased pressure on both candidates to attract moderate and independent voters.

The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, conducted in early June, showed that 58% of voters perceive Sen. Obama as a liberal and 24% view him as a moderate. In contrast, 34% view Sen. McCain as a moderate and 48% see him as a conservative.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121426892467498729.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. and I am one of those irked. You won't see me out in the streets working if he votes yes on fisa.
won't even register voters which I ALWAYS do.
not even one little bumpersticker.
I will vote for him. that is it.
I learned my lesson in 2004 when Kerry didn't count the votes in Ohio after I worked for months for him, forfeitting paying work which I needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think that's what needs to be done for strategic purposes, to win the GE --
but I don't get the FISA thing, though. Don't see how that plays into it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's the old pandering to the right makes more votes trick, I guess.
I don't believe in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. This is the LOSING argument that the DLC makes . . . a move to the right only helps McCain/GOP . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoleil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Exactly.
Harry Truman said it best:

"When voters are given a choice between voting for a Republican, or a Democrat who acts like a Republican, they'll vote for the Republican every time."

The more the Dem candidate acts like a Rebuplican (especially in this day and age) the more likely it is that the Naders of the world get more votes.

You don't win elections by shitting on your base. Don't assume that we have no other choice. If your message is the correct one, don't pander to a mythical "middle".

Dance with the one who brung ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Okay - thanks to all of you who straightened me out.
So true, it's such a DLC thing - I'm ashamed I was buying into it.

And I love Truman's comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. yep, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. My sympathies to those who truly believed in him . . . sad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. We knew this was coming.
From a strategy perspective, it's the way to win elections. Unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Didn't work that well for Gore and Kerry....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What I mena is, if Kerry had counted the dman votes instead of playing nice to "the other side"
he would be in the whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. acknowledge
Running to the right is an acknowledgement that liberalism is somehow out of the mainstream. I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. No . . . it's poor "strategy" . . . it's DLC strategy which loses elections ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. NO
It's the way to LOSE. AGAIN. Plausible deniabilityfailure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmyCamus Donating Member (371 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Odd number - "58% of voters perceive Sen. Obama"
If all Republicans say he's liberal, that means many Democrats must not think he is.
Unless it's a rejection of the term "liberal" by Democrats?
Odd number, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
41. Evidently, some of the crazy-right thinks he is
a muslim anti-christ satan.
And a specific percent of Dems think McC is too stupid to tie his own shoes.

But we never get the poll numbers on these folks - they could be significant.
(joke)
mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unfortunately it's got to be done
there is no way a candidate will get elected in the country if they stray too far from the center line. All Presidential candidates do it and we have to try to figure out for ourselves what they really mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. so they all lie?
And we're supposed to read the tea leaves? What a crappy system.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Actually, it is moving to the left that will get candidates elected . . ..
Moving to the right only helps the GOP ---

Nor do we need game playing in our elections with coded meanings ---

STOP playing along with it --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
37. Not necessarily
Just because he is talking more towards the center before the election doesn't mean he will govern that way. Are you still going to vote for Obama in November? I certainly think you won't vote for McCain, so we aren't the ones he is trying to get to vote for him. It is the independents that he has to win over, and those stupid RayGun democrats. I won't lobby for him on FISA either, but he isn't the only one who caved. And he has already said that he would want to add an amendment to strip out telecom immunity. I would like to think that if he were President, he would veto the bill if it had retroactive immunity in it. Nobody knows for sure, but the alternative is unthinkable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Exactly
If the Democrat doesn't track to the center it is over. It is painful but necessary. Democrats have had two presidential candidates since 1944 that have garnered more than 50% of the popular vote. I believe Obama will be the third.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Again, this is upside down DLC thinking . . . which only helps the GOP in their right-wing arena . .
Talking about elections without considering computer theft -- probably going back to the mid-1960's -- isn't really understanding ALL that has gone on in America since the coup on JFK . . .

which must actually be understood as "an overturning of the US government"--

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. When has centrist policy helped the majority of the American electorate?
With >$4 gallon gas, a failing market, and a foreign policy in the toilet, you'd think that Obama might second-guess the political maxim "The American public is always forgiving and forgetful, especially if you don't give them a choice."

Smart players know when the game has changed. Obama will lose more than he gains with this tactic, as Kerry did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Same excuse, different election.
there is no way a candidate will get elected in the country if they stray too far from the center line. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Face it Folks - The Dems KNOW that there is no choice - We HAVE to vote against the Repugs.
I hate that they can count on that because it give them license to do what ever they want for their Corporate masters
They can and do, ignore us

FISA
Immunity
Immunity Off the Table
etc
etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. The thing about relying on what marketers call "the mindset of futility" ...
... is that it breeds both passivity and non-involvement. You may go to the polls, but many more people than those on this forum will say "why bother?"

That's how the DLC is working to get McCain into the Oval Office. Whether this is what they are intending to do is not important.

It is stupid to support any organization that repeatedly works against its own self interest. Because it will always get around to working against yours as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. Which would explain why the Clintons are joining him on the campaign trail.
It seems they are tilting him towards the center where they operate from. Liberal Democrats might vote for Ralph Nader after all. Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. Necessary (and temporary) political posturing
Necessary (and temporary) political posturing. He's has the progressive vote all but wrapped up. Now he needs the tackle the moderate vote. I certainly don't think he's ignoring his record, or his ideals-- simply attempting to expand his voter base for the general election.

Afterward, when he takes office and cleans out the White House of the left-overs, he'll nominally return to his political roots.

Although I supported Sen. Clinton in the primaries, Sen. Obama is looking better and better to me every day. To me, this is simply illustrative of his political savvy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Temporary? How do you know?
Was Bill Clinton's triangulation temporary? Answer: No, because he's still doing it, even out of office.

The progressive vote is only wrapped up the day after election day, and as Election 2000 taught us, the counting of that vote is never wrapped up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
29.  I have no absolute knowledge.
"Temporary? How do you know?"

I have no absolute knowledge. It's simply extrapolation on my part based on what I've observed and read about the good Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Extrapolation from past actions is precisely what prompted my question.
He voted to fund the Iraq War more than once after condemning it. How can a potential voter extrapolate future actions from that?

I will be voting for Obama in the GE, but not on the belief that he'll be governing from the left. On the belief that if he's in the Oval Office, a certain Arizona senator with impulse control problems won't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I imagine everyone will have
I imagine everyone will have a different and undoubtedly unique interpretation of the good Senator-- what he's done in the past, what he does in the present, and what he will do in the future.

For my part, I believe he will govern in a most progressive manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. I wish they'd stop using the word "center"
in that deliberately distorted way. As I said on another thread, the "center" the media and the politicians are REALLY talking about isn't between left and right. It is between the people and the corporations!

It's more true in relation to this FISA bill than just about anything else I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. When did he not "tilt" to the center?
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
27. The current incarnation of the Democratic Party is farther to the right of Arlen Spector.
What are you surprised about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. Obama, will you make me very ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. To heck with right, left, and squishy middle...
It is time for the peoples of this nation to figure out that if we don't work together and arrive at some sort of common ground, we can just plan on not having a nation worth working for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
35. I do not consider Obama's hesitation to uphold his oath to the Constitution
as a Senator to be 'tilting' to the center. I consider it a hesitation to uphold his oath to the Constitution. Period. I am not an 'activist' for feeling the way I do.

I am a citizen.

I am not an 'activist' for questioning his future Presidential stance toward the Constitution given his Senatorial one.

I am a citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. When the rubber meets the road...
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 07:43 AM by agentS
is where it matters.

There's no way in hell I'd ever vote for McWarmonger, the Stray Cock Express. But that doesn't mean I won't vote for Mckinney either.
As long as McCrane is NOT in office, I don't care...well I do care- I wouldn't want that "white man's candidate" (the racist 3rd party guy on Wikipedia) to win either.

McCain would run this country deeper into the ground. Obama sure as hell won't, unless Bush has already dug us in too deep. In which case, we're screwed and even St. Obama can't save us.

This FISA thing is irksome, that's for sure. However, I think Right-Wingers should be more worried about this.
Obama sounds like he's got a plan. Either
a) he'll let the ACLU scuttle tje thing in a lawsuit
b) order Congress to revoke the immunity and the 7 days warrentless wiretap clause
or, if I were in his shoes
c) keep that law on the books and as president, use those warrentless wiretaps against the GOP and obnoxious conservatives. Possibly even let tape 'mysteriously' appear in the hands of TMZ or Pervez Hilton.
I can see it now;
Dobson: Yeah Mel Martinez, old friend, we should get Trent Lott reelected.
Martinez: Sounds like a plan to me! He'll be our lackey again...what's that coughing sound?
Dobson: Not me.
NSA spy: Don't mind me. I have a chest cold.
Martinez: Who the hell is this?
NSA spy: I am with the NSA. We're wiretapping this call.
Martinez: You can't do that! That's illegal!
NSA spy: Yes we can! You helped pass the law to make it happen, remember?
Dobson: FISA's update?
NSA spy: Yes. Why do you think the President didn't oppose it?
Martinez: That's not fair!
NSA spy: You should've thought about that before!

See, Rethugs...see what happens when you abuse the Constitution! Obama might just want to use that law on you. As far as I'm concerned, y'all are as bad as Bin Lauden. Obama might even see you in that way as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. So you're saying you want Obama to be just like Bush (or Nixon)?
-by using warrantless and unConstitutional wiretaps? Don't even try to spin that BS. That's filthy wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS Donating Member (922 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. what goes around
comes around. Rethugs haven't thought this one thru and I can't wait to see the look on their faces when it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC