Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This may sound like a snark, but it is intended to be serious: Gore vs Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:33 PM
Original message
This may sound like a snark, but it is intended to be serious: Gore vs Bush
I am virtually certain that if we were now in the waning months of the second term of a Gore presidency, things would be far better than they are now. That said, the only thing we can say with near certainty is that the Iraq War would never have happened. But what abut the other stuff?

Would the WTC and Pentagon have been attacked? An attack thwarted? Never have been attempted?

Assuming the WTC/Pent would have still been attacked, would we have gone into Afghanistan? Would we still be there?

Would oil have gone as crazy as it has? Would we still be almost totally bereft of alternatives?

How about the economy? The housing bubble/bust?

What would American life have been like in the closing months of an Al Gore presidency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. We would never have been attacked. This has been a neo-con wet dream for
years. They MIHOP to get their oil wars on. Of course only a few, Cheney, Wolfie, Perle and maybe a few others know the whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pt22 Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't believe you don't know it was Bush vs. Gore
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Whoa ..... that's a theory I've not heard before!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's a good one
I think I'll spread it around just because joe has earned it. Just for fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. haven't heard that one, but did hear Gore was prepared to go into Afghanistan
to school the Taliban. Plans all drawn up. (NOT IRAQ, THOUGH!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I could see him going into Afghanistan.
Yup. I could.

But not Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The Attack On The W.T.C. Might Have Been Thwarted, Sir
If it went through, Afghanistan would have been invaded. We would probably still be there.

Oil prices would be somewhat more sensible, but the housing bubble would probably still have been and burst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Indeed--the celebration of liberal plans to attack Afghanistan
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 10:19 PM by librechik
makes me want to heave. Have none of them read history? invading Afghanistan is the definition of hubris.

Can we not build on our knowledge instead of repeating the same mistakes over and over?

Guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The History Of The Place Is Not Unknown To Me, Ma'am....
The gentleman asked for assessment of probably events in a counter-factual scenario. The exercise has no point of one simply plugs in fondest wishes. The fact is that any government of a country attacked as the U.S. was that day, which had the military power in hand to effectively strike the base of operations where the attack originated, would have gone to war there in response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I would have sent the troops in for blowing up the Buddhas
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 12:04 PM by librechik
That was a crime against humanity. And you never know, that might have stopped everything right there, pre-9/11.

Wishes indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. We Are On The Same Page There, Ma'am
That was a crime of stupendous proportion against the whole of the human heritage, and as you say, the result of a proper response might have been most salutory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-26-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. My view
Edited on Thu Jun-26-08 07:28 PM by Juche
The destruction of the WTC and pentagon wouldn't have happened, as Cheney wouldn't have been in charge of air defenses and war games on that morning, which he supposedly was on 9/11. So even if the plan went through to fruition and the planes were hijacked by Al Qaeda, the planes probably would've been shot down by the Air Force.

We would've gone to Afghanistan anyway but never Iraq.

Alternatives would be taken more seriously, but with a GOP congress and no 9/11 (likely just a few hundred deaths from the planes being shot down) the appeal wouldn't be as strong. So there'd be alternatives to oil, but not a whole bunch more than now.

I doubt the housing bubble would be as big as my understanding is due to deregulation by the Bush admin banks were able to make dangerous loans that they normally wouldn't be able to make. With Gore regulating the banks and preventing as many risky loans the housing bubble might not have been as severe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC